volcom92886
Registered User
McDavid had a nice triple lutz on the "penalty" against Landeskog. Quite the embellishment there
Stealing the Leafs shtick ?No one is rolling over the Avs. Its the Avs year.
That was not playoff hockey. It was an exhibition all star showcase pond hockey game. Honestly these series in the west have mostly been an embarrassment. The goaltending is horrific, there is not an ounce of defense being played, there is no physical play, no intensity. After watching this game, now watch tomorrow and how quickly the difference in level of intensity will be. Anybody who likes the garbage that was on tonight is too enamored with go go go more more more. Flash and Dash. People going gaga over Makar, my opinion, I still take a defenseman like Hedman over him any day.
Thank you for posting that. I wouldn't say that anyone is burying their heads in the sand. That video contradicts the written rule, but based on your post, the league has addressed it in some manner. You have to admit that releasing video explanations like this that directly contradict the official NHL rulebook is not a good way of getting consensus on these plays.Love all the Oilers fans burying their head in the sand when it comes to the 'offside goal' when there is literally video explanation that it isn't offside. In case you haven't seen it, here it is:
Official Site of the National Hockey League | NHL.com
The official National Hockey League website including news, rosters, stats, schedules, teams, and video.www.nhl.com
@6:15.
Still....Lol at their "defence"You’re right, not a great night as a whole for the d core, thankfully they still won even though they were subpar and Kuemper was a sieve. As said all along, jack johnson will get turnstiled and it was seen as he and Manson were solidly outplayed. The rest of the d core played exactly as advertised but let’s make grandiose presumptions!
Nice to see Makar and Toews put up the same amount of points as Mcdavid and Draisaitl. Funny that, if only those “lol” worthy defencemen could do it outside of garbage time and could contribute to a win.
MacGinnon doesn't have anything in his arsenal besides skate fast with puck.Much like the Calgary series, I don't think either team is worried until they lose a game on home ice. I also don't think we'll see any other games in this series like this. The goaltending on both sides is a huge question mark though, so honestly who knows.
Also will be curious if Bednar keeps matching up the top lines or if he switches it up. I thought the Mackinnon line was excellent in the first period, and then got progressively worse as the game went along matched up against McDavid.
No, but I was just trying to enlighten the original poster who appeared to think that the Oilers hadn’t gotten lit up like this previously.This is true, but does anyone objectively feel like Calgary is as good a team as Colorado?
Thank you for posting that. I wouldn't say that anyone is burying their heads in the sand. That video contradicts the written rule, but based on your post, the league has addressed it in some manner. You have to admit that releasing video explanations like this that directly contradict the official NHL rulebook is not a good way of getting consensus on these plays.
If you want to be a Debbie downer then to each their own, but just stick to baseball 1-0 complete games. Avs had plenty of intense ozone sequences, good minute+ of ozone cycle domination. Was there some weak goals, sure, but there was also a lot of bardown, cross crease crisp passing plays. Goals were basically scored in every form.That was not playoff hockey. It was an exhibition all star showcase pond hockey game. Honestly these series in the west have mostly been an embarrassment. The goaltending is horrific, there is not an ounce of defense being played, there is no physical play, no intensity. After watching this game, now watch tomorrow and how quickly the difference in level of intensity will be. Anybody who likes the garbage that was on tonight is too enamored with go go go more more more. Flash and Dash. People going gaga over Makar, my opinion, I still take a defenseman like Hedman over him any day.
McDivesaitl?McDavid had a nice triple lutz on the "penalty" against Landeskog. Quite the embellishment there
MacGinnon doesn't have anything in his arsenal besides skate fast with puck.
Once opposing defenses figure him out and adjust after game 1 he disappears.
Look at the Blues series. 2 points in game 1. Then goose eggs until the Blues had to shift coverage to Kadri.
Bednar is smarter than he looks. He knows the MacGinnon line draws attention and the Aves have enough depth to beat most teams. But McDavid doesn't just play defense. He'll shut down MacGinnon and put up 3 goals a game at the same time.
I'm in genuine shock that the Aves won a game. Without being spotted two goals by the league the Aves don't have a chance.
Thank you for posting that. I wouldn't say that anyone is burying their heads in the sand. That video contradicts the written rule, but based on your post, the league has addressed it in some manner. You have to admit that releasing video explanations like this that directly contradict the official NHL rulebook is not a good way of getting consensus on these plays.
I'm simultaneously more at peace with it and more frustrated.Oh 100% and i've said multiple times that the NHL is inept for this reason. I actually really like they provided video explanations to make it clear cut, but they decided to more or less say 'f*** it' when it comes to the actual written rulebook.
You are a true scholar of the game.But how about that JT Compher, amirite?!
The written rule cites a player having control and possession as being the standard for zone entry, with possession meaning:How does it directly contradict the rulebook?
Not every team can be gifted calls like the Avs.McDavid had a nice triple lutz on the "penalty" against Landeskog. Quite the embellishment there
I like my defence to win games personally, and they won. You?Still....Lol at their "defence"
"He scored the points, what do you want from a defenceman, to play defence??"