alphahelix
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2007
- 7,440
- 3,254
Lets be honest guys, on PAPER, Colorado has SUBSTANTIALLY better D than Calgary.
If you were Colorado, how many Flames would you take on your D if you could have them for free? 1? Maybe 2 I guess, throw Hanifin-Tanev on your bottom pair. But we didn’t even have to face a healthy Tanev. And we didn’t have to face Doughty.
Colorado has 3 really good D pairs. Bowen Byram has more skill than any D on Calgary or LA that we faced.
Calgary got to top GA rankings with systems play and goaltending. Guys like Gudbranson and Zadorov are giant and slow and can’t hang with McDavid. There are no D on Colorado like that. Hopefully they make some mistakes that we can capitalize on when they are being hyper aggressive, but most of them are dangerous scoring threats.
Our D will have to play through the roof and we will be relying on Smith at times to win games. I believe in us but its going to be a slog. Woodcroft will have to outwit Bednar at times, I think.
If you were Colorado, how many Flames would you take on your D if you could have them for free? 1? Maybe 2 I guess, throw Hanifin-Tanev on your bottom pair. But we didn’t even have to face a healthy Tanev. And we didn’t have to face Doughty.
Colorado has 3 really good D pairs. Bowen Byram has more skill than any D on Calgary or LA that we faced.
Calgary got to top GA rankings with systems play and goaltending. Guys like Gudbranson and Zadorov are giant and slow and can’t hang with McDavid. There are no D on Colorado like that. Hopefully they make some mistakes that we can capitalize on when they are being hyper aggressive, but most of them are dangerous scoring threats.
Our D will have to play through the roof and we will be relying on Smith at times to win games. I believe in us but its going to be a slog. Woodcroft will have to outwit Bednar at times, I think.