crazyhawk
Registered User
Awesome book for sure! And the movie wasn't too shabby too!!No joke, Being There is one of my all-time favorite books. Solid reference.
Awesome book for sure! And the movie wasn't too shabby too!!No joke, Being There is one of my all-time favorite books. Solid reference.
Carlson gets Subban money - zero doubt about it...he isn't under $9mil per year, that ship has sailed...
people can say they don't want Carlson at that money, but if we didn't have Seabs under contract, I would venture a guess that says the majority of this board would be drooling to get Carlson..he is having a career year, but has been a 50 point player if playing a full 80 games the past few years...
I'm still absolutely blown away at people wanting to tie down the cap $$$ to another massive, long-term deal, honestly. Whether that is Tavares, Carlson, EK, etc. I have zero desire to sign any of the big FAs that will command 8-9m over 7-9 years. None at all. Massive contracts to aging players should be a huge red flag to any Hawks fan. The funny thing is... those same people who want one of these big FA splash players will be the exact same ones *****ing in a year or two about how the deal is terrible, and the player is seriously overpaid, and killing the Hawks.
Carlson is going to be 29 next season. It would be a giant mistake to sign him to a large cap hit/long-term deal, and even if there was no Seabs, I would highly recommend the Hawks avoid him. It's Seabrook all over again. If the Hawks signed Carlson to a large deal, kiss this team goodbye for the next 5-7 years. You'd have close to half your cap tied up in 4 players - Toews, Kane, Seabs, Carlson.
So mortgage the next decade for one more Cup? Nah... I'd rather build this team with youth and talent, and go on another 5-7 year run.
If the Hawks are rebuilding then tear the whole thing down and shop everybody. Reality is they can still compete with a new coach and some shrewd moves to fix the D and add a couple depth forwards. They have the picks and cap space to do it. I trust Bowman more than Q at this point. But if we can sign Tavares at a similar cap hit to Toews and Kane then do it and bottom the **** out in 3-5 years.
I personally do not want to see the Hawks sit on 10m+ cap space while a guy like Kae is still elite and Cat/Schmaltz are trending that direction as well. Reload and go for it. If they stand pat then they’re in for a rough year.
So mortgage the next decade for one more Cup? Nah... I'd rather build this team with youth and talent, and go on another 5-7 year run.
I can understand saying no to Carlsson with Joker, Mitchell and potential #8 overall coming. But to pass up on Tavares and list a bunch of guys like Hino, Duclair, Sikura, Edjsell?, Delia as guys we need to pay as well?....Talking a guy in JT thats a world class player at a premium position. If Tavares says come sign me for 10m you tell all those guys you listed excluding Cat and Schmaltz to pack their bags. And then you tell Saad and Murphy to get their bags out of the closet just in case.
Yes, because any team ever wins the Cup with one or two good lines and trash for a supporting cast? You need great depth. Without it, you're in and out of the POs real quick. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this.
Who says the depth will be **** though? A team with Tavares with an 85m cap ceiling will be better than what they have now. Can make some very realistic assumptions to retain the important guys you listed. Move Anisimov and give his AAV to Schmaltz, he goes from 925k to ~5.5m per, extremely likely. Next, Cat. He’s due in two years and will be restricted. Organic cap growth will be a few million. Crawford, Saad and Murphy will account for ~16m that can be moved. Seabrook could receive a compliance buyout. That’s ~23m in cap that could be realistically removed. Hinostroza, Hayden and Sikura you deal with down the road.
Who says the depth will be **** though? A team with Tavares with an 85m cap ceiling will be better than what they have now. Can make some very realistic assumptions to retain the important guys you listed. Move Anisimov and give his AAV to Schmaltz, he goes from 925k to ~5.5m per, extremely likely. Next, Cat. He’s due in two years and will be restricted. Organic cap growth will be a few million. Crawford, Saad and Murphy will account for ~16m that can be moved. Seabrook could receive a compliance buyout. That’s ~23m in cap that could be realistically removed. Hinostroza, Hayden and Sikura you deal with down the road.
That’s if you’re lucky. I think at this point, Schmaltz’ agent can already make the case for a 6x6 deal. If the contract isn’t signed this offseason, that price likely only goes up next season.
Also, DeBrincat is already looking like he will cost $6million+ once his deal is up.
Laid out pretty clearly how they pay those two. Also have Rutta making 2.3m that can be gone yesterday if needed.
How? Hino and Hayden need contracts right now. Move AA... if someone wants him(and this is limited by his modified NTC). Deal Murphy? He's likely part of the D corps until his contract is up. They have nobody to play defense, and Murphy is a solid top 4 guy, who plays D with no Murphy? You'll have Keith, Seabs, Oesterle, Gustafsson, Forsling, Murphy, Rutta as of right now. With no Murphy, you have two top 4 D in Keith and Forsling, most likely. Cat... yeah, he's RFA, but he'll also likely have 3x 30+ goal seasons under his belt by the time that expires. Cat is likely a 7-9m cap hit coming off his RFA, as bridge deals have basically disappeared in the league at this point. Schmaltz is likely going to command 6x6...
I think this is all pipe dreams and hoping for a lot to go right, and absolutely nothing to go wrong... I mean, you're literally speaking to dream scenarios. And still losing your entire supporting cast of quality bottom 6 players, for Tavares... This would be horrendous management by Bowman, and if it happens, kiss this team goodbye, and kiss Stan goodbye. Unless that is your goal... it's just dumb.
And 85m cap ceiling? Where you getting that? Because it's not going up 10m this offseason. It will be anywhere from 75m-82m. I doubt it finishes on the high end of that, though. I expect it likely falls somewhere around 79-80m
Either way, you're dreaming. This team is nowhere close to where you may think they are. Certainly not with the current coach/GM.
Hayden and Hino are worth a collective 3.5-4m max on their next deal. And that’s being generous. If the Hawks take Bouchard, Dobson or Boqvist and with Joker coming they can spare Murphy and his ~4m to play 3rd pair minutes. Seabrook is likely to be gone if there is another lockout. Forsling next deal won’t be worth much. I don’t understand the concern about maintaining a team that was absolutely horrible last year. Especially when I laid out all the cap they can clear. Saad and Anisimov out to pay for Schmaltz and Cat are about as clear as day to happen if needed.
Hayden and Hino are worth a collective 3.5-4m max on their next deal. And that’s being generous. If the Hawks take Bouchard, Dobson or Boqvist and with Joker coming they can spare Murphy and his ~4m to play 3rd pair minutes. Seabrook is likely to be gone if there is another lockout. Forsling next deal won’t be worth much. I don’t understand the concern about maintaining a team that was absolutely horrible last year. Especially when I laid out all the cap they can clear. Saad and Anisimov out to pay for Schmaltz and Cat are about as clear as day to happen if needed.
You said Schmaltz is worth 6m. So we’re talking 500k there. Cap growth alone in 2 years will account for that. Cat might be worth a bit more than 6. Saad makes 6, again, very realistic outcome if needed to fit in Tavares. And Crawford would be q year away from UFA status and 36 years old? They could probably retain to trade him if he’s still a quality goaltender. Possibly LTIR if he never finds his game after the injuries and wants to hang em up.
It’d be a huge mistake to bank on a hypothetical get out of jail card for Seabrook. You cannot plan on that happening until you know for sure, that’s how you get royally screwed.
Also, Schmaltz and DeBrinct combined are definitely going to cost more than $10.55 million, so you can’t assume moving Saad and Anisimov alone pays for them.
Moving Saad to keep Schmaltz or Cat is not a lateral move based on production. Anisimov can be moved. There are literally people posting in this forum about Hawks getting a late 1st or 2nd for him next month. Now we’re debating if they can move him at all?
I'm thinking Anisimov gets moved soon. Just don't know what for.
Are you blind? He has a no trade clause. There's a lot more to moving him than you think... Jesus. It's like talking to a brick wall at this point.
And yes... it's a lateral move based upon production. Saad is a typical 50 point player, who had a bad year. Schmaltz and Cat were both 50 point players this season...