Confirmed with Link: Jake Walman to Edmonton for F Carl Berglund and Conditional 1st

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Not sure who is going to play defense here next year is the only thing I don't think

Hopefully we have some trades or UFAs on the way in this summer
We're going to have to spend $20M+ just to reach the cap floor next year. Not worried about next year because there are so many things that have to get settled and we have so much money we can/need to spend. Impossible to project right now, but pretty confident we will look a lot different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saskatoon and DG93
i think what it took to get him is irrelevant to his current value. The guy is a top pairing D singed for another year at bottom pairing price. No way he should go for just a first. That would be an amazing steal for the other team.
How is what it took to get him irrelevant to his current value? The trade happened 60 games ago. It's amazing that we found a sucker team that thinks a 20 game hot streak to start the season vaulted Walman into a completely different stratosphere of value than he had around the league last summer.
 
Draft picks are assets and assets can get you d-men better than Walman (2025 edition) in trades.
I don't think so. A 2026 Edmonton first is not that great an asset. teams value today's picks over next years picks signficantly, so that pick wont have that much value this summer to acquire a better/younger D.. Furthermore, that pick is very likely to be in the mid to late 20s, which really isn't worth a ton.

Walman, just a rental this year, would be worth a first (Walman value >>>gourde or Bjorkstrand). But a 23 min, top pairing D signed for a year 3.4M in their prime is worth at least a 1st if not more. So, two firsts equivalent is the right starting price.

The other big thing here is that trading pending UFAs is both expected and costs nothing. But trading your #1 Dman who was signed at a low rate next year for distant future assets sends a very strong white flag for next year too. I think that is a massive error. We should not be giving up on next year, even if there was no intention of extending walman. Id rather have him for the year next year, and then, if they falter, trade him for that same 2026 1st at the deadline in march '26, a deal that is nearly surely available if he has half the year he had this year.

Now, a 2026 1st, a 2027 1st, and Orielly, and we can talk. I think Walman's value has to be greater than Bjorkstrand and Gourde combined.

Not gunna lie, Im realllllly annoyed to read this news. Walman has been the only D worth watching and the only D with any semblance of a legit two-way threat. Those are guys you want to stock up on, not trade away. Ferraro can go, but losing walman really boils my blood.

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.............
 
One problem we're going to have shipping out our only competent warm bodies on D is not simply that we're going to be even more awful (which we are), but that next year and the year after when we have guys like Dickinson and hopefully Schaefer is that they're not gonna have competent veteran D partners available to mentor them. I'm nervous about our ability to get decent veteran dmen on the UFA market without horrific overpayments, which might not be the best thing for the development of our talent in the pipeline.
At the moment, the Sharks have to spend $20M to reach the cap floor.
They also have stockpiled picks that can be used in trades.

The flexibility is incredibly good.

How is what it took to get him irrelevant to his current value? The trade happened 60 games ago. It's amazing that we found a sucker team that thinks a 20 game hot streak to start the season vaulted Walman into a completely different stratosphere of value than he had around the league last summer.
Or maybe you're just wrong...
 
i think what it took to get him is irrelevant to his current value. The guy is a top pairing D singed for another year at bottom pairing price. No way he should go for just a first. That would be an amazing steal for the other team.
Walman ideally should be a 2nd pair guy. He's playing 1D for us because we need warm bodies. He's a great top 4 guy but definitely not a 1-2D. Getting a 1st for that is damn good. Sounds like the Oilers paid extra too. We won't know for sure until tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cas
How is what it took to get him irrelevant to his current value? The trade happened 60 games ago. It's amazing that we found a sucker team that thinks a 20 game hot streak to start the season vaulted Walman into a completely different stratosphere of value than he had around the league last summer.
Of course acquisition costs are irrelevant. Gourde was originally an AHL signingfor TBL, does that make him worthless.

A 20 game hot streak? What are you talking about. In DET, walman scored 21 goals in 126 games (14 goals/82 gms). Thats amazing, especially since 20 were at EV (only 1 pp). The fact that detroit dumped him made no sense at the time. Great play by grier, but irrelevant to current value. The last two months, walman is averaging 25 mins a game! he is playing #1 mins. yes, he had a hot streak 10/28-11/30, but he has been the #1 all year, and the fact that he plays those kind of minutes on a massively minus team and is basically even is amazing. he has proven himself to be a legit top 4, possibly top pairing Dman. Thats very very valuable, not to mention pretty damn good size at 6'1, 218.

The asking price, if they sell at all, should be based on his actual performance, salary structure, age, etc. his performance is top pairing. his salary is 4-5M under value for next year (if he was a UFA hed get 7+ next year), and hes 29, right in the middle of his prime.

These kind of D rarely come on the market, and grier should recognize that and get a whole lot more than a 1st. or, better yet, keep him and start emerging from the rebuild, and deal him at the deadline next year if that seems prudent, or if the sharks have a great year (which is not impossible), then extend him.

Alas, yet another talent jettison by GMMG. Great acquisition, but more talent back out the door.
 
I don't think so. A 2026 Edmonton first is not that great an asset. teams value today's picks over next years picks signficantly
They don't this year

Front offices are really down on the late first round this year, those picks are being valued less (see: Granlund and Ceci trade), a late 2026 1st is more prized than a late 2025 1st right now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
One problem we're going to have shipping out our only competent warm bodies on D is not simply that we're going to be even more awful (which we are), but that next year and the year after when we have guys like Dickinson and hopefully Schaefer is that they're not gonna have competent veteran D partners available to mentor them. I'm nervous about our ability to get decent veteran dmen on the UFA market without horrific overpayments, which might not be the best thing for the development of our talent in the pipeline.
I think that's a problem they will be able to handle. If we have another young defenseman jump in next year, they will have Liljegren and Desharnais to start and probably looking to get another one at a minimum. And if they need to overpay, we should be fine with one when the cap is going up by a lot the next three years.
 
I'm wrong that Jake Walman was traded with a 2nd round pick for future considerations on June 25th, 2024?
Yeah, the trade that Detroit made was fair value... But the trade being made now is someone being 'suckered into thinking he is good'.

He is a simple fact for you:
At 5v5, Sharks with Walman on the ice: -1
At 5v5, Sharks without Walman on the ice: -37

But I guess that's only because of 20 games fooling everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Of course acquisition costs are irrelevant. Gourde was originally an AHL signingfor TBL, does that make him worthless.

A 20 game hot streak? What are you talking about. In DET, walman scored 21 goals in 126 games (14 goals/82 gms). Thats amazing, especially since 20 were at EV (only 1 pp). The fact that detroit dumped him made no sense at the time. Great play by grier, but irrelevant to current value. The last two months, walman is averaging 25 mins a game! he is playing #1 mins. yes, he had a hot streak 10/28-11/30, but he has been the #1 all year, and the fact that he plays those kind of minutes on a massively minus team and is basically even is amazing. he has proven himself to be a legit top 4, possibly top pairing Dman. Thats very very valuable, not to mention pretty damn good size at 6'1, 218.

The asking price, if they sell at all, should be based on his actual performance, salary structure, age, etc. his performance is top pairing. his salary is 4-5M under value for next year (if he was a UFA hed get 7+ next year), and hes 29, right in the middle of his prime.

These kind of D rarely come on the market, and grier should recognize that and get a whole lot more than a 1st. or, better yet, keep him and start emerging from the rebuild, and deal him at the deadline next year if that seems prudent, or if the sharks have a great year (which is not impossible), then extend him.

Alas, yet another talent jettison by GMMG. Great acquisition, but more talent back out the door.
Lol Gourde was signed literally over a decade ago. How can you compare that to a trade that happened late last June?

Walman was one of the worst defensemen in the league in 2023-24. Then he scored 19 points in his first 22 games with the Sharks and has been mostly terrible ever since (and wasn't good defensively even when he was scoring). He's a soft turnover machine who can't defend.
 
Walman ideally should be a 2nd pair guy. He's playing 1D for us because we need warm bodies. He's a great top 4 guy but definitely not a 1-2D. Getting a 1st for that is damn good. Sounds like the Oilers paid extra too. We won't know for sure until tomorrow.
let's assume you are right, and he is a second pairing D. (clear top 4 though). Thats worth a 1st at the deadline for pretty much any team. Look at the market. Brian dumoulin (a bottom 4 guy average) got a 2nd+ as a pending UFA. Walman>Dumoulin so a 1st would make sense if he wa a pending UFA. But next year's 3.4M salary is well under market, so his value has to be even more.

I am baffled at the feeling on this board that a 1st for walman is a good deal??? Do you all really think hes not good?
 
Walman flashed for the first half of the season, but hasn't been good lately. Its more likely that the Walman we saw was him just having a hot streak rather than the real Walman. If the return is indeed a first, its a great move. I feel like if we hang on to him, he is going to get worse and worse and tank his value more.

I don't think the real Walman is much more than a bad second pairing guy. On a good team, you certainly would hope he was not on your second pair.
 
A Oiler 2026 first round pick won't play for the sharks until 2028, meanwhile they lose a capable Dman, Does anyone think GMMG can find a Jake Walman replacement in the UFA market when 31 other teams have extra cap space? this looks foolish.

And yes, getting a 1st for a cap dump on paper looks quite smart, For other teams that have depth, or should the sharks just tell everyone, fans, media, team- its another season of suffering but its going to be wizbang awesome in 2030
nah that oilers 1st is ammo in the summer for who GMMG wants. theres about a 10% chance we use it
 
Lol Gourde was signed literally over a decade ago. How can you compare that to a trade that happened late last June?

Walman was one of the worst defensemen in the league in 2023-24. Then he scored 19 points in his first 22 games with the Sharks and has been mostly terrible ever since (and wasn't good defensively even when he was scoring). He's a soft turnover machine who can't defend.
I only used Gourde as an example because acquisition costs are not relevant. It's all about what you currently bring to the table.

Wow. My assessment of Walman is entirely different. It's like we are watching two different guys. I agree that he is prone to a bad turnover here and there. But, playing 27 mins, that's gunna happen. And to say he cant defend? I don't get it. None of the stats back you up as Ive seen it.

All that said, I suppose that if grier has moved him for a first, then I suppose he agrees with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Yeah, the trade that Detroit made was fair value... But the trade being made now is someone being 'suckered into thinking he is good'.

He is a simple fact for you:
At 5v5, Sharks with Walman on the ice: -1
At 5v5, Sharks without Walman on the ice: -37

But I guess that's only because of 20 games fooling everyone.
No, what you're arguing is that the entire league mis-valued Walman in the offseason but the genius Oilers management team who fumbled Broberg and Holloway because they spent all their money on washed up garbage like Jeff Skinner, Arvidsson and Henrique is accurately valuing him right now.

Great, the Sharks are better when Walman is on the ice with the top six compared to when Thrun or Vlasic is on the ice with Goodrow and Kunin. That definitely makes him worth a 1st+.
 
nah that oilers 1st is ammo in the summer for who GMMG wants. theres about a 10% chance we use it
Cant get a whole lot during summer '25 for a '26 late 1st. I understand that accumulating assets always helps, and I hope you are right that this pick is used to get a more 23-25 year old top 4 replacement.

That said, with Walman gone, the sharks have ZERO clear top 4 Dmen going forward. None. Zero. Mukh is the closest possibility but still a mile from being annointed even close. Ferraro is next closest but we know hes not adding anything offensively and is a borderline #4. Liljgren is after that, but he too was a healthy scratch and hasnt looked very good overall. bascially, we got nothin'. At least nothing remotely proven.

If walman is gone, Grier is gunna need to add at least two top 4 Dmen this summer to create even a mediocre D, and really 3 to create any semblance of respectability.

What the hell is his plan? To be dead last the next 3 years again?

When does the talent ADDING phase begin?
 
Walman flashed for the first half of the season, but hasn't been good lately. Its more likely that the Walman we saw was him just having a hot streak rather than the real Walman. If the return is indeed a first, its a great move. I feel like if we hang on to him, he is going to get worse and worse and tank his value more.

I don't think the real Walman is much more than a bad second pairing guy. On a good team, you certainly would hope he was not on your second pair.
Yeah, that's why I'm okay with the trade. He legitimately played like a #1D for the first 20 games, but what he is is a solid #4, and his second half as showed that.
 
Another masterclass by Grier. Takes Walman on for free + a 2nd round pick. Walman comes out on fire boosting his value (even though he has since declined a good amount) and then flips him for a 1st. Grier is so good at maximizing value...whether it's Blackwood, Granlund, Walman, Karlsson, or Hertl. Really, really nice work. He continues to impress big time.

Oh and regarding Walman himself, he was never going to be a long-term piece here with the LD prospect pool looking the way it is (hopefully with Schaefer on the way too, /knocks on wood). It was refreshing to see someone who could actually pass for a top-4 defenseman rather than the abomination from last year, but he's not actually a top pair defenseman. Best of luck in Edmonton.
 
No, what you're arguing is that the entire league mis-valued Walman in the offseason but the genius Oilers management team who fumbled Broberg and Holloway because they spent all their money on washed up garbage like Jeff Skinner, Arvidsson and Henrique is accurately valuing him right now.

Great, the Sharks are better when Walman is on the ice with the top six compared to when Thrun or Vlasic is on the ice with Goodrow and Kunin. That definitely makes him worth a 1st+.
Nice strawman, I’ve never said Walman is worth a first. In fact, go look through threads - I’ve said his value won’t be higher and so it’s a great move.

If you think being a -1 at 5v5 in 50 games on THIS sharks team isn’t impressive, than you’re being disingenuous.
 

Ad

Ad