Arizona and Montreal trying to be the smartest teams in the room is a really bad look with their draft history
Anaheim has at least shown they know what they’re doing
I keep saying, consensus is by definition average. But if consensus is only right about BPA 75% of the time (and that's probably generous), you should be ignoring consensus every 4 years. Remember, consensus means the good scout's opinions get wiped out by the bad ones, and you end up with an opinion that's pretty much just a median scout. To me, that's not something to aspire to.
Thus the above average drafting teams will in fact differ from consensus fairly often. Of course, the bad drafting teams will as well, just that they deviate when the consensus actually has it right.
But given Anaheim's recent history, which group are they likely to be in?
They seem to like very particular types of traits, and maybe it's a bit different than other teams, but it does seem to lead to promising NHL prospects. They also were supposedly down to two guys they felt had separated themselves, which means they would never have traded back more than a single spot anyway.