The thing about Kravtsov is he was brought here by the new management team. That means, to many on here, that he is automatically better than anyone brought in by Benning.
However , if you pretend that Vitali was a Benning decision, it looks like another 'meh' outcome.
This is also true of how, many, look at the other 'meh' guys.
Joshua?- whatever
Aman- same thing.
Studnicka- ditto
Scrub replacement level players are just that- no matter who signed them.
the guys JB signed
![]()
replacement level players, are replacement level players- no matter who signed them.
Aman is getting $883,750 this year-
Many JB signings were for about that or less. some hits, lots of misses; which happens with replacement level players.
It's making things up to say that Benning was bashed for all his trades; he was rightly bashed for his numerous idiotic trades.
But people liked it when he paid a small price to acquire a useful if unspectacular player, I think he generally got credit for the Motte, Highmore, Chaisson, etc.
Trying to conflate that with "but people bash Benning" because Benning goes after Eriksson, Beagle, Roussel and pays a 2nd for the likes of Vey is nonsensical.
pdo has nothing to do with c%, f%, s% or xg% and aman is team worst or nearly so (beaten only by studnicka and boeser in xg%). joshua isn't much better. aman has tough deployment but joshua doesn't really
i don't think aman is the worst forward on the roster but he's pretty close. joshua only looks as good as he does because vancouver have played so many awful players in their bottom six this year and he's probably an everyday nhler at least
sure. i'm not comparing the current crop of "pro scouting finds" to benning's though. i'm just pointing out that people just assume aman or joshua are good because the pro scouting is good but then the evidence the pro scouting is good is that aman and joshua are good
Just making things up now. People like Aman because he's a pleasant surprise, a flyer on a guy most didn't think would turn into something and yet he holds his own, enough that he displaced the $1M / 3 year Lazar.
And Joshua brings toughness while holding his own in actual hockey, which is valuable to have.
They get valued because they have value, not making something up to justify saying things about the scouting.
You’re weighting the recency over the whole as per usual.
Look I don’t mind those two guys (I liked Pedersen too) but the idea they’ve been crazy effective is just narrative.
They’re miles better than Studnicka that’s for sure.
Just checked over the recent sample….the numbers are similar to the whole. Both in Beagle GF% range.
Right, and how much did Beagle cost, both in terms of salary and what it took to get rid of him? THAT is the comparison with Benning that makes people appreciative of the improvement with current management (which admittedly anything other than Benning would be a low bar to beat).