- Oct 9, 2012
- 34,558
- 33,843
I saw Stone’s day timer, he has his 2026 LTIR scheduled alreadyRight, if I were Calgary I'd want the unprotected 2026.
I saw Stone’s day timer, he has his 2026 LTIR scheduled alreadyRight, if I were Calgary I'd want the unprotected 2026.
They award cups for cleaning out buffets now?well after winning 6 straight cups a change of scenary would be welcome![]()
Agreed, but apparently there were only a small number of teams with which he would be willing to sign an extension and thus have longer-term value.there was like 24 teams he could be traded to.
No kidding. Look at the Jeannot return. Pretty much double what we got for triple the player.
What happens in Vegas doesn’t stay in Vegas, decline the lack of protectionRight, if I were Calgary I'd want the unprotected 2026.
The local joke is: "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. And if you believe that, ask your blue jeans."What happens in Vegas doesn’t stay in Vegas, decline the lack of protection
Amen. It will be interesting to watch Treliving work his magic in Toronto.Rather than blame Conroy, blame the stupidest GM in hockey, Treliving, who failed to trade him (or sign him) when he had leverage.
People keep using this as a precedent.I d argue the return is not bad it s just on the lower end of the spectrum. Hanifin should likely be closer to Lindholm than Savard in terms of value. Same thing for Tanev should be closer to Chiarot return than what he got (but in this case it realy depends how you value the prospect I guess)
the deadline market is determined by who is best now, not who was best in previous years. The best player is the best player, and they get similar returns.Stop referring to rentals as though "rental" is the only facor that is relevant. You are going all in/head first into apologist mode. Team's almost never trade dmen like Hanifin at the deadline who is at the peak of his game which is why you came up with such laughable comparatives.
TSN just listed Ritchie as a #6 affiliated prospect in the NHL. Brzustewicz wasn’t even listed in the top 50.Huh? I know how much you love Ritchie. Brzustewicz is in the same bucket. He has 20 more points and plays defense. He returned a good prospect, 1st, 3rd/4th, C prospect and a cap dump. That's a damn fine return. I was happy with Brz, 1st and cap dump.
Hindsight is always 20-20.The problem is, the picks they have won't get be high and their own will be middling.
They had a huge opportunity 18 months ago to trade Huberdeau and Weegar and have a rebuild at that point. Those two at the time on their contracts, would've probably returned half of what the Flames have got for all the players named above.
I don't care about Craig Button's lists. He has a worse record than you do at evaluating prospects.TSN just listed Ritchie as a #6 affiliated prospect in the NHL. Brzustewicz wasn’t even listed in the top 50.
Brzustewicz Is having a very good season on a loaded team. Ritchie is carrying a so so team to the top of the OHL.
They are not even close to comparable. You’re overrating that guy. He’s a solid b+ guy trending well.
And that's fine, but with the Lindholm deal containing a multi-year cap dump of a multimillion dollar AHLer, that deal was closer to being a 1st and a 2nd than some want to admit, and the difference between a 1st and a 2nd and a first and a conditional 3rd (that can become a 2nd) is pretty minute.I d argue the return is not bad it s just on the lower end of the spectrum. Hanifin should likely be closer to Lindholm than Savard in terms of value. Same thing for Tanev should be closer to Chiarot return than what he got (but in this case it realy depends how you value the prospect I guess)
You rate brew entirely too high. There was a reason he was drafted in the 3rd and a reason scouts still doubt him. I hope he works out but he lacks any one elite aspect to his game and that usually doesn't bode well, especially for a smaller dman.Huh? I know how much you love Ritchie. Brzustewicz is in the same bucket. He has 20 more points and plays defense. He returned a good prospect, 1st, 3rd/4th, C prospect and a cap dump. That's a damn fine return. I was happy with Brz, 1st and cap dump.
He’s talks directly with teams and scouts. You don’t.I don't care about Craig Button's lists. He has a worse record than you do at evaluating prospects.
Disagree. I've disagreed the whole time. Lekkerimaki is good, better than Brzustewicz. Ritchie isn't. Wait and see. He'll be a top 4 defenseman by 2026.You rate brew entirely too high. There was a reason he was drafted in the 3rd and a reason scouts still doubt him. I hope he works out but he lacks any one elite aspect to his game and that usually doesn't bode well, especially for a smaller dman.
I’ve lived here for almost 20 years and I’ve never heard that and don’t even know what it means hahaThe local joke is: "What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. And if you believe that, ask your blue jeans."
Amen. It will be interesting to watch Treliving work his magic in Toronto.
Could care less. His draft record as a GM in Calgary speaks for itself. If you want some laughs go and look at his top nhl affiliated prospect list from 2014-2017. It's comically bad.He’s talks directly with teams and scouts. You don’t.
Reference to folks hitting the buffets and putting on 5 pounds before leaving town -- the 5 pounds didn't "stay in Vegas" but stressed the blue jeans on the flight or drive home.I’ve lived here for almost 20 years and I’ve never heard that and don’t even know what it means haha
Not doubting you in anyway, just laughing at how we miss some stuff
They've been allowed before, this isn't a new conditionI have no idea how that condition on the first is even legal. What’s stopping teams from saying “we’ll give you this player, but if we decide someone else wants them more then we’ll give you something else.
Vegas’ success is really more about finding creative ways to abuse the system than it is building and developing a team.