Vegas has granted permission for a team to speak with Cassidy and will do so on a case by case basis | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Vegas has granted permission for a team to speak with Cassidy and will do so on a case by case basis

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
It's morally and ethically f***ed up.

One thing all the people saying "I'd gladly sit at home for 4.5 million" and "He's still under contract with Vegas" aren't taking into account is that this hurts Bruce Cassidy professionally and could actually cost him money in the right situation. Imagine if there's a bidding war for his services but he's not able to sign the best contract for himself and his family because VGK is blocking potential employers from signing him.
Not to mention when he is a free agent amd there isnt a coaching vacancy open for another year or so?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RyCam
The only variation is if the new contract pays less, then Vegas pays the difference; if it pays equal or more, then Vegas' payout obligation drops to zero.

Which could be one of the reasons Vegas is controlling access. They may want to make sure 100% of the obligation is bing covered off by the new team.
 
Words mean something. It really amazing this far into the Cassidy saga that there is still confusion/lack of understanding of the difference between 'fired' and 'relieved of duties' . It may be (and pretty much is) a scummy move for Vegas to pull these shenanigans, but they're well within their legal rights to do what they are doing. Cassidy is under contract for another year and will be paid his salary even if doing nothing.

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should
 
Couldn't Cassidy just terminate the contract since he's not longer occupying an active position if he believes a year off for 4.5mil is of no benefit to him?
 
I wonder which team they gave permission to. Toronto just announced their new coach, L.A. got theirs, Vegas even has next year's announced so no forcing him to coach there. Edmonton is a possibility but I could see Vegas denying permission just to maybe get Babcock there within the division and all the chaos that will ensue.
AK Bars Kazan
 
Couldn't Cassidy just terminate the contract since he's not longer occupying an active position if he believes a year off for 4.5mil is of no benefit to him?
He could, but he would be out 4.5 million and still unable to coach a team for another year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoneyManny
McCrimmon doing things like this and then crying people don’t like him because of “jealousy” is like Bill Cosby proclaiming no one likes him because they are jealous he is such a legendary entertainer.
 
Good.. I like that VGK is taking this serious. Cassidy is still employed by VGK and getting paid by them. Why just give away an extremely good coach to a rival team… screw that
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Duck Knight

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad