Confirmed Trade: [VAN/COL] Tucker Poolman (20% retained) and 2025 4th round pick for D Erik Brannstrom

Nona Di Giuseppe

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
5,036
2,655
Coquitlam
Nah, he can't handle an NHL forecheque and panics all the time with the puck. If he couldn't survive in a superior defensive core in Colorado, there's no way he's going to survive in an inferior defensive core in Vancouver.


Brah, the two million doesn't count against the cap when its put on LTIR blud. This ain't rocket science.

You clearly have no idea how any of this works. I’d read more, type less until you figure out tbh.
 

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,673
10,136
BC
As far as the Canucks are concerned they won this. They got a bad, but serviceable depth D and got rid of someone who will be on LTIR all season ruining the teams cap plans for a late 4th when the consensus was that it would take a 1st or 2nd to move him.
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,082
12,226
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.

Indeed. It's hard to even call it a "win-win" because nobody is really "winning" here. It's just a swap of things that two teams didn't want...that fit each others' situations and cap needs better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
15,147
14,440
I'd take Poolman over Brannstrom easily. That Avs blue line is vastly improved from last year even after getting rid of Walker. If Kylington plays like a legit top 4 dman this year, then the Avs will be tough to beat. I doubt you find a better trio of puck moving D on a single team than Makar, Girard, Kylington.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Peen

Peter Griffin

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
35,123
7,614
Visit site
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.
If anything, both teams got exactly what they wanted/needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biturbo19

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,433
5,124
Indeed. It's hard to even call it a "win-win" because nobody is really "winning" here. It's just a swap of things that two teams didn't want...that fit each others' situations and cap needs better.
So they each get rid of something they don’t want to further help both of their teams situations? How is that not a win-win?

I'd take Poolman over Brannstrom easily. That Avs blue line is vastly improved from last year even after getting rid of Walker. If Kylington plays like a legit top 4 dman this year, then the Avs will be tough to beat. I doubt you find a better trio of puck moving D on a single team than Makar, Girard, Kylington.
Poolman probably never plays again…
 

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
10,200
9,562
Manitoba
As far as the Canucks are concerned they won this. They got a bad, but serviceable depth D and got rid of someone who will be on LTIR all season ruining the teams cap plans for a late 4th when the consensus was that it would take a 1st or 2nd to move him.
The consensus?

Who in their right mind thought it would cost a 1st or a 2nd to move a guy on his last year of a 2.5 mil cap hit...? Not to mention he's LTIR..

Canucks fans are really trying to make this deal sound better than it actually is for them, not that a 4th round pick is much of a loss.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,251
5,010
The consensus?

Who in their right mind thought it would cost a 1st or a 2nd to move a guy on his last year of a 2.5 mil cap hit...? Not to mention he's LTIR..

Canucks fans are really trying to make this deal sound better than it actually is for them, not that a 4th round pick is much of a loss.

...because the Canucks can now accrue cap space over the season, while the Avs were planning to utilize LTIR all year, giving them 2-3 million more space at the deadline.. It's a win-win, but there's people out there acting like a 4th is backbreaking and Allvin was made to be the fool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barsky

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,082
12,226
So they each get rid of something they don’t want to further help both of their teams situations? How is that not a win-win?


Poolman probably never plays again…

I mean...in the sense that it's hard to call a junk swap any kind of real "win". It's really just more like a "no lose" situation. Both teams are now postured marginally better for what they want to do. But trading poop for a turd is hard to declare a "win" for either side. Even if neither side loses.
 

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,433
5,124
I mean...in the sense that it's hard to call a junk swap any kind of real "win". It's really just more like a "no lose" situation. Both teams are now postured marginally better for what they want to do. But trading poop for a turd is hard to declare a "win" for either side. Even if neither side loses.
Avalanche get an additional $1 million to use during the season because of his LTIR. That’s a pretty big win by cap standards
 

CraigBillington

Registered User
Dec 10, 2010
1,774
1,603
...because the Canucks can now accrue cap space over the season, while the Avs were planning to utilize LTIR all year, giving them 2-3 million more space at the deadline.. It's a win-win, but there's people out there acting like a 4th is backbreaking and Allvin was made to be the fool.
People assume that 19 year old player from the USHL who is four years away from an AHL contract is more important than having the ability to build cap space this year. (I know that's just worst case, but my actual point stands)
 

nightonthesun

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
1,828
2,068
New Jersey
It's fine, we've got uhh *checks notes* ... Kylington, de Haan... John Ludvig? They've certainly been on the ice at times, and from what I can tell, they're playing ice hockey.

I'm sure Brannnnstrom was fine, but just wait for the PDO to catch up with him. All luck.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,507
10,416
Montreal, Canada
Brannstrom just played his first game for the Canucks. And it was tidy defensively. Most fans were happy with his game

I was surprised that there was not a team that gives importance to advanced metrics that grabbed him to have him in their lineup when the Avs acquired so much defensive depth. Sure, his size will always be a challenge but Brannstrom deserves to play in the NHL.

Something that people don't really know but he has only been outscored by 99 D-men at ES in the last 2 seasons combined (so only 3 per team on average despite 3rd pairing minutes). He's not really great on the PP because his shot doesn't create enough offense but he's efficient at ES and pushes the play forward with quick retrievals and excellent transition. He's quite similar to what Grzelcyk was for example, just maybe not as fast.

In the last 2 seasons combined, he was also 57th in xGF/60 and 36th in xGA/60, 29th in xGF% overall which is seriously the best you can hope/ask from your 3rd pairing D-man. This is what surprises me, I know Ottawa let him go (he a stupid Dorion 2.0 QO) which killed his worth to other teams but no one else noticed these advanced stats?

The thing is there is so much talent available today that teams are going to prioritize D-men with size unless you're an exceptional like Hughes or Hutson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brookbank

NOTENOUGHRYJOTHINGS

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
2,128
4,347
I'd take Poolman over Brannstrom easily. That Avs blue line is vastly improved from last year even after getting rid of Walker. If Kylington plays like a legit top 4 dman this year, then the Avs will be tough to beat. I doubt you find a better trio of puck moving D on a single team than Makar, Girard, Kylington.
Kylington playing like a legit top 4 dman would mean the Avs have a sick AHL squad.

But he sure won't ever do that at the NHL level ever again.

He may have had a year or two with the Flames where he looked like an NHL player. But those days are long gone. He'll struggle to be a middle pairing dman in Sweden in two years from now.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad