Confirmed Trade: [VAN/COL] Tucker Poolman (20% retained) and 2025 4th round pick for D Erik Brannstrom

Nona Di Giuseppe

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
5,034
2,649
Coquitlam
Nah, he can't handle an NHL forecheque and panics all the time with the puck. If he couldn't survive in a superior defensive core in Colorado, there's no way he's going to survive in an inferior defensive core in Vancouver.


Brah, the two million doesn't count against the cap when its put on LTIR blud. This ain't rocket science.

You clearly have no idea how any of this works. I’d read more, type less until you figure out tbh.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,219
4,962
Lol, Okay Canucks fan.. You're right, Canucks won the deal

As far as the Canucks are concerned they won this. They got a bad, but serviceable depth D and got rid of someone who will be on LTIR all season ruining the teams cap plans for a late 4th when the consensus was that it would take a 1st or 2nd to move him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,663
10,107
BC
As far as the Canucks are concerned they won this. They got a bad, but serviceable depth D and got rid of someone who will be on LTIR all season ruining the teams cap plans for a late 4th when the consensus was that it would take a 1st or 2nd to move him.
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,041
12,189
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.

Indeed. It's hard to even call it a "win-win" because nobody is really "winning" here. It's just a swap of things that two teams didn't want...that fit each others' situations and cap needs better.
 

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
15,019
14,301
I'd take Poolman over Brannstrom easily. That Avs blue line is vastly improved from last year even after getting rid of Walker. If Kylington plays like a legit top 4 dman this year, then the Avs will be tough to beat. I doubt you find a better trio of puck moving D on a single team than Makar, Girard, Kylington.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Peen

Peter Griffin

Registered User
Feb 13, 2003
35,097
7,563
Visit site
When has LTIRetired players ever taken a 1st or 2nd to move? A mid/late pick has been the going rate since... well forever.

This is such a minor deal, it's weird people calling a winner. It's a step up from AHLers getting swapped.
If anything, both teams got exactly what they wanted/needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biturbo19

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,390
5,076
Indeed. It's hard to even call it a "win-win" because nobody is really "winning" here. It's just a swap of things that two teams didn't want...that fit each others' situations and cap needs better.
So they each get rid of something they don’t want to further help both of their teams situations? How is that not a win-win?

I'd take Poolman over Brannstrom easily. That Avs blue line is vastly improved from last year even after getting rid of Walker. If Kylington plays like a legit top 4 dman this year, then the Avs will be tough to beat. I doubt you find a better trio of puck moving D on a single team than Makar, Girard, Kylington.
Poolman probably never plays again…
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetcoastOrca

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
10,194
9,541
Manitoba
As far as the Canucks are concerned they won this. They got a bad, but serviceable depth D and got rid of someone who will be on LTIR all season ruining the teams cap plans for a late 4th when the consensus was that it would take a 1st or 2nd to move him.
The consensus?

Who in their right mind thought it would cost a 1st or a 2nd to move a guy on his last year of a 2.5 mil cap hit...? Not to mention he's LTIR..

Canucks fans are really trying to make this deal sound better than it actually is for them, not that a 4th round pick is much of a loss.
 

Rowlet

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 13, 2018
4,219
4,962
The consensus?

Who in their right mind thought it would cost a 1st or a 2nd to move a guy on his last year of a 2.5 mil cap hit...? Not to mention he's LTIR..

Canucks fans are really trying to make this deal sound better than it actually is for them, not that a 4th round pick is much of a loss.

...because the Canucks can now accrue cap space over the season, while the Avs were planning to utilize LTIR all year, giving them 2-3 million more space at the deadline.. It's a win-win, but there's people out there acting like a 4th is backbreaking and Allvin was made to be the fool.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,041
12,189
So they each get rid of something they don’t want to further help both of their teams situations? How is that not a win-win?


Poolman probably never plays again…

I mean...in the sense that it's hard to call a junk swap any kind of real "win". It's really just more like a "no lose" situation. Both teams are now postured marginally better for what they want to do. But trading poop for a turd is hard to declare a "win" for either side. Even if neither side loses.
 

josra33

Registered User
Aug 11, 2008
5,390
5,076
I mean...in the sense that it's hard to call a junk swap any kind of real "win". It's really just more like a "no lose" situation. Both teams are now postured marginally better for what they want to do. But trading poop for a turd is hard to declare a "win" for either side. Even if neither side loses.
Avalanche get an additional $1 million to use during the season because of his LTIR. That’s a pretty big win by cap standards
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad