Don’t expect Raptors boss Masai Ujiri to take the bat off his shoulder. It’s been a while.
www.thestar.com
With a one-time home-run hitter like Masai Ujiri running the Raptors, moments like Thursday night’s NBA draft always hold the possibility of a long-awaited big swing.
Savvy draft-night deals, after all, have a history of mythical deliverance in the world’s best basketball league. It’s how the Lakers got Kobe Bryant, how the Mavericks got Dirk Nowitzki, how the Raptors, long before Ujiri was making the decisions, ended up with Vince Carter. Which makes it a moment of tantalizing possibility. On a night like Thursday, the executive who chooses the correct undervalued prospect can, if things go improbably well, change the fortune of a franchise with one move.
Whether or not such a transaction is in the offing, of course, is another matter. Raptors assistant general manager Dan Tolzman said in his annual pre-draft chat with reporters Tuesday that the club was giving “quite a bit” of attention to the possibility of moving up in the draft from its current late-lottery slot at 13th overall. Which is the kind of thing that, taken out of context, could excite a fan base that’s been waiting a long time for a high-impact move.
Alas, there was plenty of context provided Tuesday. Tolzman essentially went on to say that the Raptors, along with considering all the possibilities of moving up in the draft, have also done plenty of research on what might be available should they choose to move back in the draft. Oh, and they’ve covered their bases about what they’ll do should they stand pat and pick 13th.
“How realistic is it that we can move up? I don’t know,” Tolzman said. “But at the same time, you don’t want to not be prepared for it.”
Preparation is one thing, of course. Execution is quite another. And recent history suggests that Thursday night will be a relative non-event. Just like many forecast the Raptors as potential NBA rain makers at this season’s trade deadline, only to see Ujiri sit and watch the office paint dry, the safe bet is the Raptors make their pick at No. 13 and largely stick with the status quo, at least for now.
Certainly Tuesday offered a modest nudge in that direction, when Raptors guard Gary Trent Jr. made the somewhat unexpected move of exercising his player option for next season and forgoing free agency. You could say Trent Jr. is betting on himself, sure. Or perhaps, as a competent jump shooter playing for a club lacking that skill set in quantity, Trent Jr. is betting on the notion he can secure a longer-term deal with a Toronto franchise that can’t afford to let him go.
There are other decisions looming, among them Fred VanVleet’s impending free agency. But as much as Ujiri spoke after the season about the in-house “selfishness” and the fractured culture, so far the franchise has signalled its belief that a considerable part of last season’s problem was head coach Nick Nurse. Witness last week’s introduction of Nurse’s successor, Darko Rajakovic, and the many implications that Rajakovic has vowed to pay more heed to the importance of developing the roster than Nurse ever did.
Tolzman insisted the “structure” and “process” of the Raptors’ in-house development program is as strong as it’s ever been, even if the developmental success stories haven’t come in abundance since the like of Pascal Siakam and VanVleet defied the odds to become all-stars. Hint, hint: Blame Nurse for burying the likes of Malachi Flynn and Dalano Banton on the bench while their career arcs flatlined, and maybe even for allowing Scottie Barnes to stagnate as a sophomore. The proof, of course, will be in how they perform going forward.
“I think we have a pretty good track record of (developing players) and I don’t think we necessarily forgot how to do that,” Tolzman said. “And so I think everyone around here is still very confident that no matter who we bring in or even the guys that are still on our roster, we can continue to put an emphasis on getting better.”
As for the importance of new-coach energy, said Tolzman: “(Rajakovic is) going to have different ideas and different perspectives of what works. We’ve been doing things a certain way for quite a while now, to where having a little bit of a fresh perspective on it could go a long way of improving our process … Like I said, I don’t think we need to change a ton of it. But, at the same time, having a new set of eyes and some ideas as to what can be done, I think it could actually benefit (the program) a lot.”
If it all sounds naively optimistic, well, such is the hope-inducing nature of draft night. Literally everything can change in a moment if the Raptors happen upon the right circumstance; history tells you as much. Still, if a foundation-shaking blockbuster is the dream, and securing a transformational player is the fantasy, something decidedly less seismic is the likely reality.