Raptors Discussion: v97 Raptor's 2024-2025 - Training camp begins Oct. 1

Keep or Trade - Siakam

  • Trade

    Votes: 63 90.0%
  • Re-Sign

    Votes: 7 10.0%

  • Total voters
    70
  • Poll closed .

stickty111

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
27,232
34,145
People won't like this but I would move Barnes for Durant assuming he is okay with coming.
 

Eyedea

The Legend Continues
Jan 29, 2012
27,796
3,645
Toronto, Ontario
People won't like this but I would move Barnes for Durant assuming he is okay with coming.

End of the day if you could move Barnes + picks for Durant, that’s potentially 4 years of title contending. He’s still a superstar and adding him to FVV, OG, Siakam, and Achiuwa allows them to have a true #1 option and the bench has GTJ, Young, and Boucher (as well as potential vets willing to sign cheap). Tough choice because I love Barnes but that’s probably what it’s going to take.

Edit: I should’ve clarified that salaries don’t match so OG, GTJ, and Birch would be moved in this scenario too. Add PHX as a 3rd team to pull in Ayton. Bench would still be thin but the hope would be to maybe target another shooter with MLE? Then hopefully fill depth with some vets.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: stickty111

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,252
1,941
End of the day if you could move Barnes + picks for Durant, that’s potentially 4 years of title contending. He’s still a superstar and adding him to FVV, OG, Siakam, and Achiuwa allows them to have a true #1 option and the bench has GTJ, Young, and Boucher (as well as potential vets willing to sign cheap). Tough choice because I love Barnes but that’s probably what it’s going to take.
That doesn't work money wise, does it?
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,699
34,781
Langley, BC
While I agree you have to do your due dilligence, I wouldn't go after Durant all that hard because a) the price is going to be astronomical and would almost certainly gut the Raptors' depth. Then what? You're adding Durant to a team that would be cap-strapped and shallow beyond compare. Because this isn't going to be another Kawhi trade where they add the superstar by swapping out the guy who's spot he's taking, a solid but not game-changing rotation player, and a pick. and b) Durant is just as complicit in the Net's total implosion as Kyrie is. Their staff is full of "his" guys, they made personnel moves to appease his wants, they allowed him to sit back and soft-pedal the Kyrie and Harden fallouts to protect his image and rep within the locker room. I wouldn't trust him not to wreck a good thing with the Raptors.
 
Last edited:

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,492
10,353
No but I also assume that they would go after a C (Ayton) in this scenario too. Basically OG and GTJ and I think Birch would go regardless to match up salaries. Idk, it’s a tough call and Masai will obviously do what he thinks is right and I’ll be okay with it because I love Barnes.
I don’t see us getting involved here.
 

Clark4Ever

What we do in hockey echoes in eternity...
Oct 10, 2010
11,833
8,592
T.O.
While I agree you have to do your due dilligence, I wouldn't go after Durant all that hard because a) the price is going to be astronomical and would almost certainly but the Raptors' depth. Then what? You're adding Durant to a team that would be cap-strapped and shallow beyond compare. Because this isn't going to be another Kawhi trade where they add the superstar by swapping out the guy who's spot he's taking, a solid but not game-changing rotation player, and a pick. and b) Durant is just as complicit in the Net's total implosion as Kyrie is. Their staff is full of "his" guys, they made personnel moves to appease his wants, they allowed him to sit back and soft-pedal the Kyrie and Harden fallouts to protect his image and rep within the locker room. I wouldn't trust him not to wreck a good thing with the Raptors.
Agreed.
 

Dr.Funk

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
19,958
2,649
FWmU52pWAAEtXTp.jpg
 

IceColdBear

Registered User
Apr 5, 2016
570
687
How much of the MLE do we have left?

We still need a back-up pg - I think it's a bigger need than a C.

The Porter pick up was great, always good to bring in another 3 & D with length.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,646
15,270
Pickering, Ontario
End of the day if you could move Barnes + picks for Durant, that’s potentially 4 years of title contending. He’s still a superstar and adding him to FVV, OG, Siakam, and Achiuwa allows them to have a true #1 option and the bench has GTJ, Young, and Boucher (as well as potential vets willing to sign cheap). Tough choice because I love Barnes but that’s probably what it’s going to take.

Edit: I should’ve clarified that salaries don’t match so OG, GTJ, and Birch would be moved in this scenario too. Add PHX as a 3rd team to pull in Ayton. Bench would still be thin but the hope would be to maybe target another shooter with MLE? Then hopefully fill depth with some vets.
Durant is way to much of a cancer and toxic personality. He'd coar more than Barnes too. Would be Barnes + 1 of OG/Siakam

Build around Barnes. Do it slowly and right . Don't try and cheat by going fir a top 5 player at the cost of team depth and chemistry
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs10Habs

Dr.Funk

Registered User
Jul 2, 2004
19,958
2,649
How much of the MLE do we have left?

We still need a back-up pg - I think it's a bigger need than a C.

The Porter pick up was great, always good to bring in another 3 & D with length.

I haven't seen numbers for Porter yet.
 

IceColdBear

Registered User
Apr 5, 2016
570
687
Durant is way to much of a cancer and toxic personality. He'd coar more than Barnes too. Would be Barnes + 1 of OG/Siakam

Build around Barnes. Do it slowly and right . Don't try and cheat by going fir a top 5 player at the cost of team depth and chemistry

People said the same thing about Kawhi.

I would do Barnes + OG + picks for KD.

FVV-Trent-KD-Siakam-Precious

That's a championship level team. It would suck to part with Barnes, but it would be worth it to make another real run at a title.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,699
34,781
Langley, BC
People said the same thing about Kawhi.

I would do Barnes + OG + picks for KD.

FVV-Trent-KD-Siakam-Precious

That's a championship level team. It would suck to part with Barnes, but it would be worth it to make another real run at a title.

No they didn't. The potentially negative narrative around the Kawhi trade was always "what if he doesn't want to be here? Or what if he just bails after the one year?"

He never had the baggage that Durant has built up over the last few years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad