Lol you need more than one look at it? Fine. Here.id love to see another look at the hit, considering everyone here is calling blood murder about it
Can't think of many more obvious examples of a headshot than that.
Lol you need more than one look at it? Fine. Here.id love to see another look at the hit, considering everyone here is calling blood murder about it
Unless this is some satirical commentary about the consistency about the DopS, this is an absurd thing to say.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
48.1 Illegal Check to the Head - A lateral or blind side hit to an opponent where the head is targeted and/or the principle point of contact is not permitted. 48.2 Minor Penalty - There is no provision for a minor penalty for this rule. 48.3 Major Penalty - For a violation of this rule, a major penalty shall be assessed (see 48.4). Rule 28).
Feet didn't leave the ice? Watch again. Also lol "any touch to the head" that was a lot worse than a simple touch to the head.just rewinded it...
foot was on the ground, hit the shoulder first, definitely got some head but was through the body and feet didn't leave the ice. i know any touch to the head is a no no in international hockey. im talking purely hockey
You got half of them correct.Wraneschitz and Boldy game MVPs.
Feet didn't leave the ice? Watch again. Also lol "any touch to the head" that was a lot worse than a simple touch to the head.
He made contact with the body with his elbow. The entirety of his shoulder connects with the face and that was the primary point of contact. This obfuscation of what happened, likely with troll intent I'm starting to gather, is beyond weak.initial point of contact was in the shoulder, he hit him through the body and also got the head. i literally just rewatched it
You're a bad troll dude.
He made contact with the body with his elbow. The entirety of his shoulder connects with the face and that was the primary point of contact. This obfuscation of what happened, likely with troll intent I'm starting to gather, is beyond weak.
Would love to see you conjure some examples of bad ones then.literally not even trolling. just think its a good hockey hit
Would love to see you conjure some examples of bad ones then.
The team didn't cheap shot you. One player did. Would you try to punish and embarrass all of the other kids who did nothing wrong to you? I think that it's classy to show some restraint in that case. Also, it was a reward for the players on the team who had the least ice time in the game. That should matter more to a coach than making a defeated team feel even worse.
No it should be punished viciously, eh?i dont think cutting across the neutral zone admiring your pass in an 11-0 game thinking shit is sweet should be rewarded
Yes, instead you should have your life shortened from CTE and potentially your career ended. Makes perfect sense.i dont think cutting across the neutral zone admiring your pass in an 11-0 game thinking shit is sweet should be rewarded
I would want them embarrassed to begin with. Play 60 minutes. Why should you feel bad for a terrible team that doesn't belong in a competitive game with you? Why do they deserve a participation trophy? The IIHF forces the big teams to face beer league teams like Austria and Germany who might have 4-5 players who don't get embarrassed on the same ice as the big countries. If anything today's games show us that we need to cut the top group by two spots.
And then when that cheap shot happens, the thought of letting up sends a terrible message to your team. Score another goal. Embarrass them further.
If you're not interested in watching, you don't have to. No one forces you to. I don't think tonight's games change anything or are any different than every game that every other elevator team played in the years prior, and if you had a problem with those then I'm sure you have a problem with it now. But its your life, you can go do with it whatever you want, you don't have to watch these "beer league teams." Most people are fine with the way things are. And if you're not, you don't need to change it for everyone else, you can just enjoy your life without a few extra games that other people will watch.I would want them embarrassed to begin with. Play 60 minutes. Why should you feel bad for a terrible team that doesn't belong in a competitive game with you? Why do they deserve a participation trophy? The IIHF forces the big teams to face beer league teams like Austria and Germany who might have 4-5 players who don't get embarrassed on the same ice as the big countries. If anything today's games show us that we need to cut the top group by two spots.
And then when that cheap shot happens, the thought of letting up sends a terrible message to your team. Score another goal. Embarrass them further.
Agreed, there definitely needs to be a change.
Two pools of 4 is much better. #1 seeds gets a bye to the semis, #4 seeds play each other in relegation. Eliminates some of the ugly games and makes #1 seed worth something again, resulting in better round robin games. Less games though so i don't know if they'd go for it.
Why? This is such an arbitrary statement. Why does there "need" to be change?Agreed, there definitely needs to be a change.
Two pools of 4 is much better. #1 seeds gets a bye to the semis, #4 seeds play each other in relegation. Eliminates some of the ugly games and makes #1 seed worth something again, resulting in better round robin games. Less games though so i don't know if they'd go for it.
If you're not interested in watching, you don't have to. No one forces you to. I don't think tonight's games change anything or are any different than every game that every other elevator team played in the years prior, and if you had a problem with those then I'm sure you have a problem with it now. But its your life, you can go do with it whatever you want, you don't have to watch these "beer league teams." Most people are fine with the way things are. And if you're not, you don't need to change it for everyone else, you can just enjoy your life without a few extra games that other people will watch.