- Sep 1, 2010
- 10,036
- 8,007
No biggie. Wsh there had been more known for their skating. Its why i keep my hopes open re AaltonenI could be mixing up my past failed prospects from that era. There were so many of them, afterall.
No biggie. Wsh there had been more known for their skating. Its why i keep my hopes open re AaltonenI could be mixing up my past failed prospects from that era. There were so many of them, afterall.
If you follow the thread, I am talking about players developing in Hartford. Duclair never played in Hartford. Shestorkin came here at 24 year old and played about 20 games in Hartford, not exactly "developing". He developed in Russia. Buchnevich played 4 games in Hartford.
How did I not say Barron is not coming along? He has been in Hartford for 16 games, that is hardly "developing in Hartford" I give Cornell more credit for his development at this point. As far as comparison to Callahan, Callahan became a legit NHLer, that was the point of using him Girardi, Dubinsky as my references. Barron has not yet. Do I think he is on his way to doing so? Yes. But obviously not there yet.
Pionk, I actually forgot about. I'll give that one.
lmfao Ryan Leaf failed because he didn’t care about winning. He cared about the money and fame. It’s why it was such a huge red flag when he said he was going to Vegas after he drafted rather than focus on learning the playbook et al.
It’s not an unreal expectation for your team to put themselves in the best position to win. When your team makes dumb moves, they should be called out on it. I’m not saying we should win every year at all, but this team has to limit the dumb decisions they make.
I’ve always read it as party.I just realized that for the last 14 years I have been reading your name as patynyrg. Like, Paty nyr g. How about that...
If you are so friggin' concerned, then come up with at least one name that will illustrate your point. WHO IS THE MYSTERY PROSPECT THAT WAS NOT PROPERLY DEVELOPED? This is really not a hard question and even offers multiple choice.If I clearly said my concern is a lack of prospect development in Hartford, why would I bring up players who NEVER played in Hartford in Miller, Fox, Kakko, Lafreniere?
Based on freaking what do you make this statement?But to answer your question, I would say based on what has gone on the past few years there is good chance those players would have regressed in Hartford.
Which makes it......nothing more than pure conjecture.However, not something I can prove, nor can you disprove.
So, yes, your view is that Ryan Gropp would develop into a proper NHL player were he in any other system? I get this logic. I mean if only Jesse Puljuravi was drafted by the Rangers and not Edmonton, he would be a star player in the NHL. That's the same logic.As for guys like Gropp, Day, we will never know if they would have developed in other systems. What we DO know is they did not develop into anything in this system. Whose fault is that? Again, not something any of us can prove, but when the evidence shows hardly anyone outside of recent first round picks to come out of Hartford, it raises an eyebrow. Yes, maybe my expectations are unrealistic or maybe yours are too low.
Why is it his job to loose? Why not Hajek's? Or Reaunen's? Or Robertson's?As for how this applies to Jones, I am hoping they see him as having a legit shot to make the big club next season. As in they see it right now as his job to lose. I would be concerned if the thought is give him a cup of coffee this season and send him to Hartford next year. If that is the case, would rather he stayed at UMass.
As Singin' said, they don't count.Why aren't we counting Hajek and Fogarty?
And Lindgren?
Need to have a separate set of rules for each and every nationality instead of treating everyone the same way? Makes sense. That is very inclusive of you.That, I can understand. But if what Kredierman said earlier about the philosophy being a one size fits all matter, that is not a good sign, imo.
Well when one starts to panic that playing in Hartford will ruin him, this tends to happenI miss when this thread used to be about Zac Jones.
interesting trend, not including Performance Bonuses in ELC
interesting trend, not including Performance Bonuses in ELC
interesting trend, not including Performance Bonuses in ELC
Haha, exactly. That would be me. I'd just be like, "Oh shit. Oh shit. Oh shit."Lol, he looks like he's in shock.
Dude.Man, that's gotta be so cool. Getting out there the first time wearing the same sweater as guys like Trouba, Panarin, Kreider, Zibanejad, Fox, etc. Skating with these star players you've been watching on TV, knowing now you actually play on the same team as them. I know Jones has played high-level hockey and probably knows some of these guys already, but still, can you imagine how cool that would be? I'd have to pop like 10 bars of Xanax before going out there.
Haha, exactly. That would be me. I'd just be like, "Oh shit. Oh shit. Oh shit."
In exchange for burning a year, don't forget.
Smart, especially in a flat-cap world. Were the Rangers (or Zac's agent) the first to think of it?
I just traded for him on my EA squad!Dude.
That's Artemiy Panarin.
Holy shit. I'm practicing with PANARIN.
Lol, he looks like he's in shock.
"Oh my God—that's THE Brendan Smith!"Lol, he looks like he's in shock.
"Oh my God—that's THE Brendan Smith!"
Brendan | Smith | GP | G | A | Pts | |
2007-08 | U. of Wisconsin | WCHA | 22 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
2008-09 | U. of Wisconsin | WCHA | 31 | 9 | 14 | 23 |
2009-10 | U. of Wisconsin | WCHA | 42 | 15 | 37 | 52 |
Zac | Jones | |||||
2019-20 | UMass-Amherst | H-East | 32 | 3 | 20 | 23 |
2020-21 | UMass-Amherst | H-East | 29 | 9 | 15 | 24 |