I agree completely. But, if someone takes the view that Hartford is not a good place to develop, I'd at least like for them to give some examples of players they think were failed by the Hartford coaches, and maybe also not exclude higher picks that clearly benefitted from Hartford like Miller, Lindgren, Skjei, etc. I just want people to justify their position. Mine is that Hartford has been a mixed bag and I supported it by literally looking at all our picks from six years' worth of drafts.
Yeah I mean, it started early last year, suddenly everyone was all high on Hartford, JD and Drury were turning it around! That's because the first half of the season they had Shesterkin playing awesome, Joey Keane looking like a stud, Chytil playing well the first 10 games, Lindgren down to start, Huska playing well to start, etc. It's like, man, you put higher-quality prospects on the team and the team plays better? No shit! I mean the first ten games with Shesterkin, Chytil, and Lindgren, you had three legitimate NHL players. When was the last time Hartford had three prospects of that caliber in the lineup at the same time? Hartford hasn't generated a lot of NHL-caliber players because we don't send many NHL-caliber prospects down there to play (except the high picks that we can't count :laugh)); there's excitement about Hartford this season again because we have legitimate NHL-caliber prospects there.
Hartford has been mismanaged and neglected, but I don't think it has ruined any prospects, or that--save maybe for Graves depending on how you view the end of his tenure--that we've really held anyone back.
You know my criticism is based on the "can't miss prospects" struggling. To varying degrees, this organization has had problems with Kakko, Kravtsov and Lias. And those are all well-documented. That doesn't mean they never do anything right.
Kakko this season is a totally different player and I am sure the criticism he aired out is no longer relevant (re: Quinn's coaching). Kravtsov came back from Russia and looks like a different player altogether. Lias, unfortunately, didn't pan out for us but seemed to do better once he was back in Sweden.
I don't think the people in charge in Hartford are incompetent, but I do get the feeling they aren't really open to suggestions (Again, based on what I have been told by certain players). Some players say that there's just no freedom at all. They control everything and some players just respond bad to that type of environment. The problem isn't that they are handling these kids one way or another, but more (in my opinion) that they seem to use one type of approach and use that for everyone. When you have such a diverse group of people (Russian, Czech, Swedish, Finnish, French-Canadian, Canadian, American, Slovaks, Swiss) in your organization, you need to understand that they grew up in different societies and you can't just expect a Slovak kid to respond the same as a Swedish kid to the same approach. I think especially with European players it's often lost on people how diverse this continent is and that you need to sit down and figure out a way to deal with each individual. Different ethnicities , different linguistic branches, even 2 kids from Russia can be vastly different. Shestyorkin growing up in Moscow and later St Petersburg, Kravtsov growing up in Vladivostok and later Chelyabinsk, that's night and day.
This organization has been drafting and signing free agents from Europe more in the last 5 years than any time before that. Maybe that was part of the challenge. I am not saying I have the answer to all these questions, but in my job I do deal with a very diverse group. I have 15 people who report to me and they range from Bangladesh to Bulgaria, Serbia, Ghana, Finland, Wales, Brazil and Australia. If I would address each individual the same way in a 1-on-1 conversation, I'd be struggling to keep my team together.
Drury took over what, 3-4 years ago? Gernander left 2 years ago. He was a relic of the previous regime. I think things only really changed once Gernander left so we have 2 years of the current regime to judge. And within that span I am happy with what I see. Certainly much more open-minded than before. Yeah, the Lias issue still drove him away, and the communication issues with Kravtsov and Kakko weren't great but I honestly feel the coaches involved learn from this as well.
It's an ever-evolving market, and they have to adjust on-the-fly. This influx of prospects will both be a blessing and a curse because the odds are much higher that Hartford will produce some talent, since you have more kicks at the can so to speak, but some prospects will still fail. It's just impossible to put the finger on what caused those prospects to fail, and that'll still be the issue in the future.