gravey9
Registered User
- Dec 29, 2008
- 2,945
- 6,331
What the f are the Sens gonna do with all those Mottawa posters?
Sadly he was injured exactly at the time they needed him. Would have been a perfect time to see if he has what it takes to play at the NHL level.would have been nice to see him earlier in season if that was possible? Time is kinda running out to see what we have in him as an NHL 4c guy if the Rangers won't give him that chance by the TDL and the playoffs.
348 faceoffs year to date suggest he has played a fair bit at center.The Rangers: "We're overpaying for Goodrow because he gives us a lot of versatility."
Also the Rangers: "If we play Goodrow anywhere but RW, God will die."
But they keep doing very stupid things to get him away from there.348 faceoffs year to date suggest he has played a fair bit at center.
Gauthier is one of the most frequent hitters in the league.For all his speed, Gauthier has the same
points as Motte. But he doesn’t block shots, hit, or penalty kill. Motte is a clear upgrade.
Gauthier is one of the most frequent hitters in the league.
He just doesn't Trouba people which is harder for a forward and I would argue not that useful because you're almost certainly out of position.
And FWIW Motte isn't "mean" or really that conventionally/noticably physical either.
I think they're both good forecheckers and speed matters way more than hitting in that regard.
I'm just glad we didn't trade Motte for a guy who is characterized as mean and noticably physical. That's never been a good sign as long as I've been watching.
Wouldn't it be nice, if we could just trade away those players who are not necessary for the roster? After all, we are New York, so none of the players should have any clauses in their contracts. We are the NYR, so we should be able to say to those players it's a privilege to be here, so we should be able to just swap those bottom roster players because no club would be stupid enough to give them clauses in their contracts...The Rangers: "We're overpaying for Goodrow because he gives us a lot of versatility."
Also the Rangers: "If we play Goodrow anywhere but RW, God will die."
Top 50 is the second best on most teams. That's up there.Gauthier throws 12 hits every 60 min of ice time, somewhere around 50th in the league with players who played more than 30 games.
Matte throws 10 hits every 60 min of ice time.
Not really much of a difference.
I’m not convinced 91 will be better than Copp. Copp was pretty goodExcept Tarasenko and Mikkola are better than Copp and Braun and it took less assets to get them. Not sure how last year’s was better.
Tarasenko is getting seriously underrated on here.I’m not convinced 91 will be better than Copp. Copp was pretty good
I was looking at career rates.Gauthier throws 12 hits every 60 min of ice time, somewhere around 50th in the league with players who played more than 30 games.
Matte throws 10 hits every 60 min of ice time.
Not really much of a difference.
He lives on both sides of the street these days.Classic example of Brooks working both sides of the streetView attachment 653282View attachment 653283
Yup. I liked Copp and he brought the ability to move the puck through the NZ with possession reliably which is what that line needed but a comfortable Tarasenko will be a more impactful player. The type who can make things happen entirely on his own, which all due respect to Copp but he’s a support player.Yeah, Copp is kind of just there. He legit did well with Panarin, unlike the Strome fairy tale, but he's just a guy.
Tarasenko is a star on his game.
They should really try this until the trade deadline just to see what they have. If it doesn’t work, at least you know what you need. Drury should waive Jake tomorrow to force Gallant’s hand and save a little more space for the deadline. If Gallant goes 7d instead of Kravtsov then you really know where you are, but ideally kravtsov is given a shot for a couple weeks. May be sacrilege but would break up the kids in the short term and try Kravtsov in place of Kakko there. Nice spot for him and Kakko did well on the top line earlier this yearJimmy Vesey. And Krav is back in the top 9.
Gauthier was really good at giving the opponents goalie's chest protector premature wear tho...maybe. We shall see but Motte can play pk and probably is more of a pain in the ass to opposing dmen than Gauthier was.
Generally like the idea.They should really try this until the trade deadline just to see what they have. If it doesn’t work, at least you know what you need. Drury should waive Jake tomorrow to force Gallant’s hand and save a little more space for the deadline. If Gallant goes 7d instead of Kravtsov then you really know where you are, but ideally kravtsov is given a shot for a couple weeks. May be sacrilege but would break up the kids in the short term and try Kravtsov in place of Kakko there. Nice spot for him and Kakko did well on the top line earlier this year
Kreider-Zib-Kakko
Panarin-Trocheck-Tank
Laf-Chytil-Kravtsov
Motte-Goodrow-Vesey
Roll 4 lines and see how it goes. We’re pretty much locked into the 2 or 3 spot in the metro so might as well try things while we can
Really not a fan of trading Gauthier. I know he doesn’t score, but his speed and ability to drive the net brought a ton of value in my opinion.
I like Motte but I’d prefer to see him playing with Gauthier.
Brodzinski should play every game leading up to the deadline.You know I said earlier that we still need a fourth line center but I forgot we can just call up the guy who was a great fourth line center for us and was waived for no apparent reason
In YOUR opinion.