This continues to be one of the most laughable takes I’ve seen on this forum.He's better than Ceci.
Ceci was just forced to play 2nd pairing minutes because the coach was dumb.
This continues to be one of the most laughable takes I’ve seen on this forum.He's better than Ceci.
Ceci was just forced to play 2nd pairing minutes because the coach was dumb.
And Stecher gives up 3/60, while Ekholm gives up 10/60. Is Emberson twice as good of a pker as Ekholm? Is Stecher the best pker on the team, and possibly in the league? Hell Slavin on the league best PK is at 6ga/60, maybe theyd trade us him for Emberson?!? Or is that stat maybe a bit flawed? I have my thoughts on why his number is better than players that are obviously better than him, but I'll let you think on it as to why that is, or you can call him the best pker in the league. Idc.Emberson is giving up 5ga/60 on the PK, while playing the 2nd most amount of PK minutes.
He is not the issue.
I wasn't suggesting you made that claim. My response was to BBO's post in isolation.Im not saying id rather have signed Desharnais to the deal he got. That was a terrible contract.
Im saying that Desharnais last year is better than Emberson this year in my opinion. We were sold by some that he could fill in for Ceci, instead he hasn’t even been an upgrade on our 3rd pair RHD.
All these stats are noisy. This is especially true when sample size is small as it generally is with the pk. I think everyone knows that. (Stecher's TOI makes his numbers pretty much meaningless. )And Stecher gives up 3/60, while Ekholm gives up 10/60. Is Emberson twice as good of a pker as Ekholm? Is Stecher the best pker on the team, and possibly in the league? Hell Slavin on the league best PK is at 6ga/60, maybe theyd trade us him for Emberson?!? Or is that stat maybe a bit flawed? I have my thoughts on why his number is better than players that are obviously better than him, but I'll let you think on it as to why that is, or you can call him the best pker in the league. Idc.
And check your reading comprehension. I literally said he wasn't the problem, but that using pk time as a argument for why he is amazing doesn't really add up when our PK hasn't been great overall. If you wanna take your one stat and assume he's one of the best PKers in the league, go ahead.
Is there anything that you can really point to that suggests this is the case?
In my mind Emberson is a huge improvement over Vinnie. That guy could not skate or make a breakout pass. Emberson is confident with the puck. Emberson has also been able to solidfy himself as one of our best penalty killers in his pairing with Ekholm.
I think it was a bit insane to expect a guy who had like 40 NHL games played to be a top 4 dman and measure up to an NHL vet in Cody Ceci who has played like 800 Nhl games. For defenceman especially development just doesn't work that way. Only the real studs, like a Brock Faber, can really step into top 4 minutes with ease with no NHL experience.
I find Emberson to be a refresh on the back end. He plays the way that the NHL game is played now - good skater, can make a pass, always in the right position.
I think raw goals is kind of pointless to look at.The Oilers give up more than a full goal more per 60 minutes with Emberson on the ice at 5v5 compared to Desharnais last season. The offense is a saw off too, Desharnais had 11 points in 78 games last season. Emberson has 6 points in 40 games.
For our regular 6 d-men Emberson is worst in both GF/60 and GA/60. The only two d-men who have worse results than Emberson on our team this season are Dermott and Brown.
Ceci was solid in his first season here and then his level of play sank along with Nurse's. Neither are fit for Nurse's partner on the 2nd pairing, but I would take Emberson over Ceci all day on the 3rd pairing at 1/3 the price to boot.This continues to be one of the most laughable takes I’ve seen on this forum.