That simply won't happen with Nurse as their partner.
That's what happens in a perfect world. Unfortunately, we don't have a 2RD. So it's either him or Stecher. I'm not sure who the better option is.I'd rather have Emberson as a bottom pairing guy and build him up. Throwing him in the top 4D with 30 games experience is very delusional.
Don't think a long term solution has been on this roster at any point in Nurse's career. There were periods of good fortune, like the last week of finals last year. Periods where Nurse's play was masked by McDavid dominance as Nurse got the lions share of McDavid time, but you could still break down his ice time and see how much he was struggling without McDavid pushing play for him. Maybe little spurts with Ceci and Barrie, but nothing that lasted so long you were confident you would stick with it.
Chia passed on the task to Holland. Holland passed it on to Bowman, and gave a Nurse 9.25M unmovable, buyout proof deal to ensure we had no choice but to somehow find the perfect complimentary player for Nurse for our 2nd D pair isn't a weak link. And now we pray that Bowman somehow knows what that player needs to be, and can get it.
I agree, honestly. I’m still pissed we went back to Nurse-Ceci in the finals when Nurse-Kulak worked against Dallas.
Not sure I'd say that about the Dallas series
Nurse Kulak, 47 minutes, 1 GF, 3GA
Nurse Dehairnais, 35 minutes, 0 GF, 3GA
Nurse Ceci, 33 minutes, 2 GF, 1GA
Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't have gone back to Ceci-Nurse either, but Kulak did notably worse when paired with Nurse. Well, as did Dehairnais and Ceci so you cannot put that all on Kulak.
I'd rather have Emberson as a bottom pairing guy and build him up. Throwing him in the top 4D with 30 games experience is very stupid.
I’d run Stecher with Nurse and Embo with Kulak. Stecher has NHL experience to help ride out the inevitable Nurse brain farts. Let Emberson play with Kulak and get confident with the team and systems.That's what happens in a perfect world. Unfortunately, we don't have a 2RD. So it's either him or Stecher. I'm not sure who the better option is.
I agree completely.He's drawing in again tonight on the 3rd pairing next to Kulak. That is where he belongs right now. Putting him (or any inexperienced player) with Nurse is a recipe for disaster right now. I think that he is a very toolsy player that should start gaining traction if his job description is simplified a bit.
And then the wisdom is if it doesn't work with Emberson, we bring in a guy who was in the press box to play second pair?I agree completely.
The problem was that they brought him in with the intent to play him on the 2nd pair with Nurse.
2 obvious problems with that...First Emberson isnt even close to being ready to play in the top 4 and second Nurse is absolutely the wrong player to expect to mentor a green dman.
Yet management thought that playing Emberson with Nurse was a good idea.
That concerns me.
And then the wisdom is if it doesn't work with Emberson, we bring in a guy who was in the press box to play second pair?
That concerns me!
I agree.Don't really understand why they took him out for Dermott. His first couple games where he had the yips and struggled were bad, but his past 3 games he's looked good in a bottom pairing role.
I agree.
Emberson was just starting to settle down on the bottom pairing and then he gets taken out.
So much about what they are doing with this defence doesnt make a lot of sense.
I agree. Let him stay there for a good handful of games.He's drawing in again tonight on the 3rd pairing next to Kulak. That is where he belongs right now. Putting him (or any inexperienced player) with Nurse is a recipe for disaster right now. I think that he is a very toolsy player that should start gaining traction if his job description is simplified a bit.
I don’t mind them swapping Dermott and Stecher as bit as they feel fit(although Stecher should play 75% of the games imo), but Emberson should be a permanent fixture in the lineup until at least the new year. Give him some runway to see what he can do and learn/bounce back from mistakes. I don’t want to see him playing scared thinking that any single mistake could wind up with him in the press box.Emberson doesn’t appear to be the diamond in the rough we were hoping could step in for Ceci. But I still think he’s a better option than Dermott right now.
The defense has looked its best with Nurse paired with Stetcher and Kulak with Emberson imo.
I’m ready not to see Dermott play again unless we see some injuries. Let’s allow the bottom two pairings some time to get used to each other.
Won't disagree with you, but they aren't pissing a drop on offence, so each of his mistakes are magnified and we are in a big hole right now and really can't afford too much of someone learning the game at this level. But we don't have a lot of viable other options, so there's that.I don’t mind them swapping Dermott and Stecher as bit as they feel fit(although Stecher should play 75% of the games imo), but Emberson should be a permanent fixture in the lineup until at least the new year. Give him some runway to see what he can do and learn/bounce back from mistakes. I don’t want to see him playing scared thinking that any single mistake could wind up with him in the press box.