Pia8988
Registered User
- May 26, 2014
- 14,659
- 9,232
Thank you. I haven't spit up my coffee into a laughing fit in quite a while.
He was in all 3 of Ottawa, Toronto, and Nashville.
Thank you. I haven't spit up my coffee into a laughing fit in quite a while.
Um, but he did tap out of a big spot.
Must have been one of those super serious three day injuries I guess.
What a ****ing miracle.
Thank you. I haven't spit up my coffee into a laughing fit in quite a while.
You guys are acting like he had cancer and was suddenly cured. If he tweaked his groin or something in a minor way missing three days is pretty standard....
If you think he tweaked his groin, then why aren't you pissed he didn't try to play through it?
Guys play hurt all the time, especially this time of year.
He didn't even dress as the backup. A tweaked groin Tuukka isn't a better option on the bench than Zane McIntyre?
Why do people lower their normal standards and expectations for a hockey player when it comes to this guy? Why does he get treated with kid's gloves?
Thank you. I haven't spit up my coffee into a laughing fit in quite a while.
If you think he tweaked his groin, then why aren't you pissed he didn't try to play through it?
Guys play hurt all the time, especially this time of year.
He didn't even dress as the backup. A tweaked groin Tuukka isn't a better option on the bench than Zane McIntyre?
Why do people lower their normal standards and expectations for a hockey player when it comes to this guy? Why does he get treated with kid's gloves?
Um, but he did tap out of a big spot.
Must have been one of those super serious three day injuries I guess.
What a ****ing miracle.
If you think he tweaked his groin, then why aren't you pissed he didn't try to play through it?
Guys play hurt all the time, especially this time of year.
He didn't even dress as the backup. A tweaked groin Tuukka isn't a better option on the bench than Zane McIntyre?
Why do people lower their normal standards and expectations for a hockey player when it comes to this guy? Why does he get treated with kid's gloves?
Worse yet, why are absences from the two most important games of each of the last two seasons and an Olympic game treated like nothing? It's not like he's not gutting through a mid-season back-to-back...he doesn't gut through the two must-win games this team has had the last two years!!!
I love how the haters constantly move the goalposts with regard to what are the "most important" games of the year. Had he played two games ago and had to sit out last night, it all of a sudden would've been last night's game that was the most important.
If you think he tweaked his groin, then why aren't you pissed he didn't try to play through it?
Guys play hurt all the time, especially this time of year.
He didn't even dress as the backup. A tweaked groin Tuukka isn't a better option on the bench than Zane McIntyre?
Why do people lower their normal standards and expectations for a hockey player when it comes to this guy? Why does he get treated with kid's gloves?
I`m confused, is Rask good again here?
Yes, Rask is good. But respectfully, in my opinion that's not the question. The question is, is he good enough to help the team win the cup, or a cup? I think the jury is out on that due to the prevailing evidence compiled over the last three seasons.
The next biggest game is against Tampa, for obvious reasons.
And last week in a different thread I said that they could play .500 hockey the rest of the way depending on where they got those points. If they lost to the teams they are competing against it was a problem.
Being intentionally obtuse about why the Islanders game was so important is not a good look. Defend Tuukka better. It's more fun when the arguments are good.
Bang on.
The next biggest game is against Tampa, for obvious reasons.
And last week in a different thread I said that they could play .500 hockey the rest of the way depending on where they got those points. If they lost to the teams they are competing against it was a problem.
Being intentionally obtuse about why the Islanders game was so important is not a good look. Defend Tuukka better. It's more fun when the arguments are good.
Tuukka was clearly too hurt to play, we ended up winning....so why are we even dwelling on it?
The team doctors made the right choice shutting him down, unless you have some inside information Doctor EverettMike.
Didn't he shut himself down the second he got to practice Friday by saying he's doesn't think he can go 36 hours later? Before he even tried to practice?
I love how the haters constantly move the goalposts with regard to what are the "most important" games of the year. Had he played two games ago and had to sit out last night, it all of a sudden would've been last night's game that was the most important.
The next biggest game is against Tampa, for obvious reasons.
And last week in a different thread I said that they could play .500 hockey the rest of the way depending on where they got those points. If they lost to the teams they are competing against it was a problem.
Being intentionally obtuse about why the Islanders game was so important is not a good look. Defend Tuukka better. It's more fun when the arguments are good.