Was watching the game yesterday, and just decided to go out after the second period. That's usually never the case with the WJC, I'm usually glued to the set. I figured this game has no flow, it's beyond boring and Canada is obviously going to win so I left.
My question is, why did they feel a need for a zero tolerance crackdown? Complaints about inconsistency aside, which is always the case in international tournaments because you're getting refs from all around who ref differently from one another, I've always found the WJC and international best-on-best tournaments in general the most exciting hockey of the year. The NHL needed a crackdown because the talent pool is relatively depleted in comparison to say, the Olympics. You have pluggers and goons hooking and pawing for their lives out there and it slows down the game. Usually, when the relative talent level is increased, the game sorts itself out and it's quite a treat, as past WJ tournaments have been.
Instead of trying to improve on the only complaint with regards to international officiating (ie consistency) they've decided to change the rules to make it even more glaring. I hope the Canada-US game is different, but so far none of the matches have been up to the caliber of previous years.