seabass45
Registered User
- Jan 12, 2007
- 8,296
- 1,589
Isles don't have a need at RD and I don't see them helping NYR out of their problem.
He played Winnipeg dirty, he used every trick he could to get to New York, did not care about Winnipeg, why should teams play soft with him. His agent also plays dirty, so expect teams to play hardball back
The thing with his wife's job is that she cannot leave NYC for another year, so going anywhere (aside for New Jersey or Long Island) is an issue for Trouba.
I think Brooksie's reporting, which framed the matter as "NYR caving to Trouba's family," has been utterly irresponsible if not dangerous. He should retire.Folks,
Please refrain from bringing up Trouba's wife or family into this discussion. Thank you.
This isn't an issue for Trouba, this is an issue for his wife. His wife having one more year left in New York has no impact on Trouba as a hockey player. Players play away from their families all the time, every season.
Will they just waive Trouba if us uses his NTC? They could easily have a separate transaction for the team taking on the contract at its full cap hit.
No it wouldn't. They literally just did it with Goodrow. I don't hear the NHL or the PA complaining about that.NHL would be all over that and penalize the teams if that were the case. NHLPA would also be pissed.
No it wouldn't. They literally just did it with Goodrow. I don't hear the NHL or the PA complaining about that.
Look, it's a players right to use their NTC, just like it's a team's right to waive a player if they want to.
This is not accurate.Trouba's NMC remains in effect,
he contractually arranged for it to expire only once wife's residency is completed,
That was anticipated to be 2024 (now) however that won't be til next spring
Not surprised external sites like CF were out of the loop,
but NYR FO dropped the ball here, not keeping track of the commitments they'd agreed to
PA is definitely keeping an eye on teams maneuvering around NTCs by waiving players. They might not do anything about it now but if they see it happening too often they might bring it up during the next round of labor negotiations.No it wouldn't. They literally just did it with Goodrow. I don't hear the NHL or the PA complaining about that.
Look, it's a players right to use their NTC, just like it's a team's right to waive a player if they want to.
My bad, missed the second half of that nugget.PA is definitely keeping an eye on teams maneuvering around NTCs by waiving players. They might not do anything about it now but if they see it happening too often they might bring it up during the next round of labor negotiations.
Yeah, and he specifically indicated to the Rangers through his actions (and presumably words), that he prioritized his family and providing them stability in his playing career.I hate this argument. It's professional sports and players are separated from their wives and kids all the time. He is making 8 mil a year. Hire a nanny.
Actually its just reality, humans are forced to separate from their wives and kids for work related issues all the time.
Like you said, at the end of the day, it's a business.
Trouba's NMC remains in effect,
he contractually arranged for it to expire only once wife's residency is completed,
That was anticipated to be 2024 (now) however that won't be til next spring
Not surprised external sites like CF were out of the loop,
but NYR FO dropped the ball here, not keeping track of the commitments they'd agreed to
That is perfectly fine.Yeah, and he specifically indicated to the Rangers through his actions (and presumably words), that he prioritized his family and providing them stability in his playing career.
To act like that makes him a bad or unreasonable guy is sour grapes. He's under absolutely no burden, contractually or morally to do the Rangers a solid here.
So if a team picks up Trouba in waivers, and later in the season the Rangers could provide a fairly lopsided trade as "future considerations"The issue is the "separate transaction for the team taking on the contract at its full cap hit". That's the cap circumvention. Its only fine if the Rangers waive Trouba and another team claims him.
YesPlease refrain from talking about the "center piece" of why the guy doesn't want to leave New York in the free agent discussion board. I'm hoping that just meant don't make it personal.
So if a team picks up Trouba in waivers, and later in the season the Rangers could provide a fairly lopsided trade as "future considerations"