What happens then? Can they send him and his cap hit to Hartford?option d
rangers waive trouba and no team claims him
What happens then? Can they send him and his cap hit to Hartford?option d
rangers waive trouba and no team claims him
Yes to Hartford, but save only about $1.1 mill of the $8 mill cap charge.What happens then? Can they send him and his cap hit to Hartford?
None of which is the Rangers problem. Rangers should trade him, if he doesn't report then his contract can be suspended.
Players want max cash, max protections and expect sympathy when teams are interested in changing course. The hutzpah on some of these players is surreal.
I'm pretty sure his new team could toll the contract, but why the hell would it do that when Trouba is overpaid by something like 4M.Question, let's say he's traded or waived. He's fine with the new team long term, but decides he has to stick around NY for his wife and newborn. The new team and he mutually agree to a one year leave of absence. What are the contract/cap implications? Would the contract slide for a year, or would the year get erased?
Question, let's say he's traded or waived. He's fine with the new team long term, but decides he has to stick around NY for his wife and newborn. The new team and he mutually agree to a one year leave of absence. What are the contract/cap implications? Would the contract slide for a year, or would the year get erased?
New team could toll the contract but that's putting 8m on the books 2 years down the line. Let's say it's Anaheim for example, that's probably a no go because they would like Trouba off the books 2 summers from now when a lot of RFA's are up.
New team could just eat the cap this year and let Trouba not report, but what incentive is there in that to pay his salary unless the Rangers offer a hell of a sweetener.
The simplest solution is this probably gets pushed to next summer because Trouba is making things too difficult for an immediate resolution.
Players negotiate ntc's and nmc's so they negate the possibility of playing away from thier families. It's not dirty pool to invoke the clause. Don't like it, pay more and don't give the clause in the first placeThis isn't an issue for Trouba, this is an issue for his wife. His wife having one more year left in New York has no impact on Trouba as a hockey player. Players play away from their families all the time, every season.
Players negotiate ntc's and nmc's so they negate the possibility of playing away from thier families. It's not dirty pool to invoke the clause. Don't like it, pay more and don't give the clause in the first place
The issue isn't just the clause though. It seems Trouba may be threatening to not report anywhere.
This list is completely wrongAs many are aware, the Rangers are supposedly looking to trade Jacob Trouba now that his NMC has shifted to a 15-team no-trade list. It is being reported that Trouba does not want to leave NYC though, in part because his wife has one more year of her residency there (which makes it extremely difficult for her to relocate), plus they have an infant son.
Assuming this is all the case, how might Trouba had structured his 15-team no trade list in a way that makes it the most difficult for the Rangers to move him without him (which is his right that a lot of players leverage) this offseason and which teams not on his list might have interest in trading for him.
Here's my best guess as to which teams he might have included on his list, which was due 12 hours before the start of UFA:
Teams Mostly Likely on his No Trade List:
Detroit, San Jose, Chicago, Utah, Anaheim, Calgary, Buffalo, Columbus, Seattle, Ottawa, Montreal.
That's 11 teams that all have the cap space to take on most if not all of his contract, plus the Red Wings were rumored to have interest in him.
Other Possible No Trade Teams:
I'll guess the last 4 are Edmonton, Carolina, St. Louis and Nashville - keeping in mind that Nashville had a ton of cap space heading into free agency. Could easily see Philly being on the list though, given their amount of cap space and being part of a rebuild. But, let's go with this for now.
This leaves us with...
Possible Destinations
Vegas, Toronto, Washington, Vancouver, Minnesota, Tampa, Colorado, NJ, Florida, LA, Pittsburgh. These 11 teams are all more or less capped out and/or set at RD, so it's hard to imagine any of them having remotely any interest in Trouba, even with the Rangers retaining.
That leaves 5 teams: Islanders, Philly, Dallas, Boston & Winnipeg.
Tough to see them making a trade with the rival Islanders, but if there's a bad contract coming back maybe something could be worked out and it's probably the best destination for Trouba as he would not have to move. Philly wouldn't be too far either, but again...this could be a team on his No Trade List. Dallas and Boston seem set at RD and I can't see Winnipeg having any interest in bringing him back after he forced his way out.
Curious to see if this is how others would have it structured or which teams might be willing to make a deal if the price is right.
You can't even spell the company you're hating on.Dude's a phizer shill and an ass hat on the ice. No remorse waive this clown and send him as far from ny as possible
No. Risto has an extra year.Would the Rangers be willing to take Rasmus Ristolainen 3x $5.1mil and Ryan Johansen’s 1x$4mil contracts back in exchange for Jacob Trouba 2x$8mil contract.
If Johansen does not play he would be on LTIR.
If Trouba doesn’t report Philly could either suspend him without pay or suggest that Trouba be placed on NHL/NHLPA player assistance program until Trouba could get his shit together and get his family resettled in Philly.
Philly and Columbus are practically the same place. Ask Gaudreau.Philly is a short train ride away. Columbus not so much. Unless you meant they would take the cheesesteaks. Send the 1st and I’ll get on it.
Too bad he won't come to Montreal. Because we have tons caproom.As many are aware, the Rangers are supposedly looking to trade Jacob Trouba now that his NMC has shifted to a 15-team no-trade list. It is being reported that Trouba does not want to leave NYC though, in part because his wife has one more year of her residency there (which makes it extremely difficult for her to relocate), plus they have an infant son.
Assuming this is all the case, how might Trouba had structured his 15-team no trade list in a way that makes it the most difficult for the Rangers to move him without him (which is his right that a lot of players leverage) this offseason and which teams not on his list might have interest in trading for him.
Here's my best guess as to which teams he might have included on his list, which was due 12 hours before the start of UFA:
Teams Mostly Likely on his No Trade List:
Detroit, San Jose, Chicago, Utah, Anaheim, Calgary, Buffalo, Columbus, Seattle, Ottawa, Montreal.
That's 11 teams that all have the cap space to take on most if not all of his contract, plus the Red Wings were rumored to have interest in him.
Other Possible No Trade Teams:
I'll guess the last 4 are Edmonton, Carolina, St. Louis and Nashville - keeping in mind that Nashville had a ton of cap space heading into free agency. Could easily see Philly being on the list though, given their amount of cap space and being part of a rebuild. But, let's go with this for now.
This leaves us with...
Possible Destinations
Vegas, Toronto, Washington, Vancouver, Minnesota, Tampa, Colorado, NJ, Florida, LA, Pittsburgh. These 11 teams are all more or less capped out and/or set at RD, so it's hard to imagine any of them having remotely any interest in Trouba, even with the Rangers retaining.
That leaves 5 teams: Islanders, Philly, Dallas, Boston & Winnipeg.
Tough to see them making a trade with the rival Islanders, but if there's a bad contract coming back maybe something could be worked out and it's probably the best destination for Trouba as he would not have to move. Philly wouldn't be too far either, but again...this could be a team on his No Trade List. Dallas and Boston seem set at RD and I can't see Winnipeg having any interest in bringing him back after he forced his way out.
Curious to see if this is how others would have it structured or which teams might be willing to make a deal if the price is right.
I wouldn't consider it a non legit stunt. His deal was structured in a way that made it possible for his wife to finish her program before they would have to consider moving. No parent wants to be separated from a newborn for work, let alone for a whole yearYa because he can afford a year off while trying to get another deal. He’d be the guy with egg in his face if he pulled a non legit stunt.
Although couldn’t happen to a better guy
f*** no we don't need another shit player, with a shit personality, and an even shittier contract. No no NO!Too bad he won't come to Montreal. Because we have tons caproom.
Like Monahan. They give us a first, we retain flip him at deadline.f*** no we don't need another shit player, with a shit personality, and an even shittier contract. No no NO!
Cry me a river… He’s a pro hockey player with a peanut sized brain making millions of dollars… His family will be just fine.Let's say they can waive him and have a team pick him up. That's a very dirty move. I understand it's business and fans want the player gone. but waiving a player to be picked up elsewhere, when he has a child coming and a wife that needs to stay in NY is a very dirty move. The rest of the league will take notice and eventually we will need NMC to be apart of everything. You can't do that to 2 vet players in a row.