Value of: Tristan Jarry?

iago

Registered User
Apr 2, 2024
32
31
I see that he has had a rough start to the season and the Pens are playing their third string over him right now. One thing Dubas has done pretty consistently is move off of players when they lose their fit. That makes me think we could see Jarry being shopped to some teams who could use goaltending help.

What teams might be interested (Oilers, Canucks, Sharks, who else?) and what might it cost to get him?
After last night, I think there is no hope of trading Jarry, at least not without multiple significant sweeteners attached.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrisLetAngry

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
15,868
10,552
You drafted him in two leagues? :biglaugh:
The poster made the panic move. The one where you just got off your picks that are close together and now somebody just started the select your good goalie, race. Sat there just watching all the good goalies get selected and waited 20+ minutes to be disappointed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,086
85,530
Redmond, WA
I think the only chance the Penguins will have at moving Jarry is adding to him for another bad goalie with less term. I could see something around Jarry+ for Georgiev making a lot of sense with how bad Georgiev has been, but that + is probably something worthwhile. Not a 1st or anything crazy like that, but something halfway decent.

That is pretty similar to the Perron for Hagelin trade back in the day, but it was Perron and Clendening for Hagelin. I'm unsure if he'd cut it, but Jarry and Poulin for Georgiev could make sense as that move. The Penguins would probably need to retain a bit as well.
 

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
17,907
30,316
Pittsburghish
I think the only chance the Penguins will have at moving Jarry is adding to him for another bad goalie with less term. I could see something around Jarry+ for Georgiev making a lot of sense with how bad Georgiev has been, but that + is probably something worthwhile. Not a 1st or anything crazy like that, but something halfway decent.

That is pretty similar to the Perron for Hagelin trade back in the day, but it was Perron and Clendening for Hagelin. I'm unsure if he'd cut it, but Jarry and Poulin for Georgiev could make sense as that move. The Penguins would probably need to retain a bit as well.
I doubt the Avs are dumb enough to swap their mediocre goalie who has less than a year left for another mediocre goalie with 3 years left and only getting paid a guy that just cleared waivers in the process.

The cost to move Jarry without a similar longer term contract coming back would be very high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,086
85,530
Redmond, WA
I doubt the Avs are dumb enough to swap their mediocre goalie who has less than a year left for another mediocre goalie with 3 years left and only getting paid a guy that just cleared waivers in the process.

The cost to move Jarry without a similar longer term contract coming back would be very high.

Georgiev is even worse than Jarry is, though.

I don't think Poulin is enough but I think you're overestimating how much the Penguins would have to add to make that swap happen. I'd be surprised if it was more than like a 2nd in value.
 

Sike Mullivan

Nickstuitveness.
Nov 15, 2010
970
510
I think the only chance the Penguins will have at moving Jarry is adding to him for another bad goalie with less term. I could see something around Jarry+ for Georgiev making a lot of sense with how bad Georgiev has been, but that + is probably something worthwhile. Not a 1st or anything crazy like that, but something halfway decent.
I wonder if Anaheim is out of contention, they trade Gibson to Colorado for Georgiev +, then swap Georgiev for Jarry+ and run with Jarry/Dostal for a couple years.
 
Last edited:

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
17,907
30,316
Pittsburghish
Georgiev is even worse than Jarry is, though.

I don't think Poulin is enough but I think you're overestimating how much the Penguins would have to add to make that swap happen. I'd be surprised if it was more than like a 2nd in value.
Georgiev is in the final year of his deal with a 3.4 mill cap hit.

Jarry has 3 years left with a 5.375 cap hit.

Georgiev would be pretty easy to move. Jarry is a boat anchor.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,086
85,530
Redmond, WA
I wonder if Anaheim is out of contention, they trade Gibson to Colorado for Georgiev ++, then swap Georgiev for Jarry+ and run with Jarry/Dostal for a couple years.

You have the plus on the wrong side with that Gibson to Colorado trade.

Georgiev is in the final year of his deal with a 3.4 mill cap hit.

Jarry has 3 years left with a 5.375 cap hit.

Georgiev would be pretty easy to move. Jarry is a boat anchor.

Yes hence why the Penguins would be adding in the deal.

Georgiev is terrible, he's even worse than Jarry. Something like Jarry and a 2nd for Georgiev is probably pretty close to realistic, espectially if the Penguins retain Jarry down into the $4 million area. Korpisalo is way worse than Jarry and he was moved as a neutral value player at $3 million.
 

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
17,907
30,316
Pittsburghish
Yes hence why the Penguins would be adding in the deal.

Georgiev is terrible, he's even worse than Jarry. Something like Jarry and a 2nd for Georgiev is probably pretty close to realistic, espectially if the Penguins retain Jarry down into the $4 million area. Korpisalo is way worse than Jarry and he was moved as a neutral value player at $3 million.
It’s going to cost more than a 2nd to get rid of Jarry.

Retaining that long, you might as well buy him out. We also only have 1 retention spot left open and will be needing it if we want to max out value for Pettersson at the deadline.

You do not seem to understand how bad Tristan Jarry is. Luckily, you’ll get like 55 more opportunities to see it since they will just keep throwing him out there.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,912
21,499
Jarry just needs to get demoted, no need to pay to cap dump him. Just get him off the big team and hope he finds his game again in the AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giskard

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,086
85,530
Redmond, WA
It’s going to cost more than a 2nd to get rid of Jarry.

Retaining that long, you might as well buy him out. We also only have 1 retention spot left open and will be needing it if we want to max out value for Pettersson at the deadline.

You do not seem to understand how bad Tristan Jarry is. Luckily, you’ll get like 55 more opportunities to see it since they will just keep throwing him out there.

The highest cost I can find for a negative value goalie dump in recent memory was LA trading Grans and a 2nd to get out of Petersen's deal, and Petersen was worse than Jarry was. The Penguins taking back Georgiev and adding a 2nd on top of Jarry is in the same ballpark as that
 

SomeDude

Registered User
Mar 6, 2006
17,907
30,316
Pittsburghish
The highest cost I can find for a negative value goalie dump in recent memory was LA trading Grans and a 2nd to get out of Petersen's deal, and Petersen was worse than Jarry was. The Penguins taking back Georgiev and adding a 2nd on top of Jarry is in the same ballpark as that
I really don’t agree that Jarry is better than any of these guys. He’s in the same tier as them. Look how bad the Sabres made him look in 10 mins last night. He is a turnstile right now and historically the beginning of the season has been his strongest (only good) part.

Regardless, I can’t see the Avs being the team to take him on. They’ve been sabotaged by goaltending for so long I think they would have learned their lesson by now and look for a tangible upgrade.

Pens should waive Jarry, send him to WBS and hope by some miracle he finds his game or it wakes him up. Then buy him out when it doesn’t happen.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad