EverettMike
FIRE DON SWEENEY INTO THE SUN
Apparently you haven't.
Your funniest posts are, ironically enough, when you think you're being really clever.
Last edited:
Apparently you haven't.
“I absolutely agree with Everett Mike here.”"I've had enough of the Trent Frederic experience."
---me on 10/24/24
Still true.
Not a flex, an honest question. But if you're going by the box score I guess you missed the game. They looked good. Two games in a row I thought the 3rd line looked strong.Judging by the box score, probably theirs?
Odd flex. It's amazing what he can do with two terrible wingers who have actually produced points in the last 11 games.
Hell, get Frederic to center Pastrnak, he might score 70.
Yes, I glanced quickly and misread. Apologies.,Huh? How did you read my post and think I was in any way arguing that his sparse PK usage was a good thing? I was agreeing with you…
What constitutes “looked good” in your view? I’m asking because I want to better understand your criteria and what you consider the threshold is for looking good before responding.Not a flex, an honest question. But if you're going by the box score I guess you missed the game. They looked good. Two games in a row I thought the 3rd line looked strong.
There are teams that want him.I’m no Frederic fan but maybe it would be best just to keep him . He won’t have any leverage when negotiating a new deal and he’s not likely to bring much back in a trade . Keep him and hope he can improve next year?
Nah, if you can't handle "looked good" then don't bother respondingWhat constitutes “looked good” in your view? I’m asking because I want to better understand your criteria and what you consider the threshold is for looking good before responding.
??Nah, if you can't handle "looked good" then don't bother responding
Just a question of what'd they'd give up to either rent him or have first crack at signing him. I don't see him as holding all much value as a rental but who knows maybe there are a couple GMs out there who have big eyes for him.There are teams that want him.
I forgot to add that he would have some leverage because he can sign where he wants and Bruins would get nothing then which would turn fans on management ..Sweeney cannot let it come to that.Either find a deal that's fair or trade him.I’m no Frederic fan but maybe it would be best just to keep him . He won’t have any leverage when negotiating a new deal and he’s not likely to bring much back in a trade . Keep him and hope he can improve next year?
I’m no Frederic fan but maybe it would be best just to keep him . He won’t have any leverage when negotiating a new deal and he’s not likely to bring much back in a trade . Keep him and hope he can improve next year?
Classic avoidance because he knows the criteria he's using is paper thin and actually agenda driven. Freddy sucked today, yet again. Zero impact. Nearly 16 minutes of TOI and all of one shot and one hit. Lost more faceoffs than he won. Largely invisible out there most shifts. He's simply not effective and I'd give him a night off to see if that lit a fire in him. He's just so passive.
Thats fair lol being out of shape is a lack of effort. Always thought Maroon looked way out of shape though and somehow he made the effort to contributeBeing out of shape and a lack of effort are almost identical phenomena to me relative to those who play sports professionally.
I saw a post in here saying he's bad defensively pointing to +/- which is where this came from.It's not a measure of defensive play.
When it wasn't the worst, it was because he was playing better. Pretty easy to figure, no?
I saw this on INSTAGRAM and instantly thought of you Lonnie. I love you!Classic avoidance because he knows the criteria he's using is paper thin and actually agenda driven. Freddy sucked today, yet again. Zero impact. Nearly 16 minutes of TOI and all of one shot and one hit. Lost more faceoffs than he won. Largely invisible out there most shifts. He's simply not effective and I'd give him a night off to see if that lit a fire in him. He's just so passive.
The smart move would be to trade him now and get something because this version of the player is not worth what he's going to want and possibly get on the free market.
I remember getting roasted on here for suggesting trading/upgrading Freddy + for Barbashev back in February 2023 before he went to Vegas.
Present day- folks are ready to carry him out of the garden themselves
“I think the Bruins will end the calendar year with 44 points. I also think they will lose to the Caps 3-1 with Braz scoring the only goal in that final game of 2024”
—- me on 10/24
I love it Dom!! I'll be more than happy to not post in this thread next year. Hopefully it will be due to Freddy rebounding and contributing offensively. That will at least hopefully reduce the amount of mental gymnastics by several posters here, therefore reducing my need to refute the stupid.
No, no, Trent Frederic has boat anchors as wingers apparently.The third line looked good tonight because two of them hustled and played their asses off. That will always help a line. Imagine hat might have been had the third guy on that line played with the same jam.
The deadline lately has shown that teams will overpay for a player. Been pretty shocked at some of the players getting a return of a 1st or 2nd round pick lately. Preferably I'd want a hockey trade of an NHL player coming to Boston. But more like a pick.Just a question of what'd they'd give up to either rent him or have first crack at signing him. I don't see him as holding all much value as a rental but who knows maybe there are a couple GMs out there who have big eyes for him.