kingsboy11
Champions Again
This was so much easier to understand when we weren't right up against the cap. My brain hurts
I think they will give him a roster spot but put him in a position to fail as they’ve done repeatedly. And once he does, they will use that as justification to dispose him.If Kaliyev doesn't make the team you have to wonder if it's just never going to happen with him and this management team/coaching staff. There are going to be warts with this player that are never going to go away, you have to take the good (lethal world-class shot) with the bad (skating, defense). Plenty of other teams have players like this on their roster, and they maximize the good and try and minimize the bad. If AK is demoted in favor of a younger rookie who has been in the organization for about a half a year it seems the Kings are unable or unwilling to do that.
Kaliyev is not a young kid anymore, this is his 4th year of pro hockey.
If Laf has passed him on the depth chart, I still suspect the org sees Kaliyev as Arvidsson's replacement starting next year.If Kaliyev doesn't make the opening night roster, you have to wonder if it's just never going to happen with him and this management team/coaching staff. There are going to be warts with this player that are never going to go away, you have to take the good (lethal world-class shot) with the bad (skating, defense). Plenty of other teams have players like this on their roster, and they maximize the good and try and minimize the bad. If Kaliyev is demoted in favor of a younger rookie who has been in the organization for about a half a year it seems the Kings are unable or unwilling to do that.
Kaliyev is not a young kid anymore, this is his 4th year of pro hockey.
sounds right to me but i really don't rememberDidn’t he get hit hard ?
He took a high hit but continued playing. Maybe he's having issues.Didn’t he get hit hard ?
I hate to attempt to dispel the TM hates Kaliyev narrative, but....If Kaliyev doesn't make the opening night roster, you have to wonder if it's just never going to happen with him and this management team/coaching staff. There are going to be warts with this player that are never going to go away, you have to take the good (lethal world-class shot) with the bad (skating, defense). Plenty of other teams have players like this on their roster, and they maximize the good and try and minimize the bad. If Kaliyev is demoted in favor of a younger rookie who has been in the organization for about a half a year it seems the Kings are unable or unwilling to do that.
Kaliyev is not a young kid anymore, this is his 4th year of pro hockey.
The same guy who thinks that Blake has done an amazing job drafting top end talent. Todd has his head up his derrière. I wouldn’t be so quick to guzzle everything Todd says. But it is you at the end of the day Axl. If Kaliyev lost his spot to MacEwen last year then I think it’s safe to say if Todd has access to a eucalyptus tree then Kaliyev would lose his spot to it.
f***ing the team over before the start of the season
f***ing the team over before the start of the season. Dean Lombardi would never.
No no no, how could Blake have seen this coming? It's all Kaliyev's fault!wow if only there were some way to see the cap constraints coming
or even an entire front office position dedicated to it
or even a several forward-looking departments of folks responsible for long-term vision keeping an eye on it
truly unique and unprecedented, you really feel for these guys, what were they supposed to do, not spend over their credit limit?
and it's even more letters than mclellan so it's purely him being cuteI can't say enough how much I hate the nickname Toddfather. It was funny the first time I heard it, but referring him as that in quoting, articles, etc is extremely grating to me.
Anyway, weren't rosters due at 5 PM Eastern? No other moves announced yet.
Capfriendly still has them at 24/23 and $2.4 million over the cap.
in DB's defense, I don't think TL would grant any more interviews if he started starting him "the marsupial"I can't say enough how much I hate the nickname Toddfather. It was funny the first time I heard it, but referring him as that in quoting, articles, etc is extremely grating to me.
Anyway, weren't rosters due at 5 PM Eastern? No other moves announced yet.
Capfriendly still has them at 24/23 and $2.4 million over the cap.
The tight cap is affecting many teams, not just the Kings. People are acting as if starting with a short roster is uniquely afflicting the Kings due to mismanagement. Four years of virtually no cap growth has made it difficult for most teams. I guess all these other teams are clowns too?wow if only there were some way to see the cap constraints coming
or even an entire front office position dedicated to it
or even a several forward-looking departments of folks responsible for long-term vision keeping an eye on it
truly unique and unprecedented, you really feel for these guys, what were they supposed to do, not spend over their credit limit?
The tight cap is affecting many teams, not just the Kings. People are acting as if starting with a short roster is uniquely afflicting the Kings due to mismanagement. Four years of virtually no cap growth has made it difficult for most teams. I guess all these other teams are clowns too?
Vancouver (22):
Carolina (21):
Calgary (22):
Colorado (21):
Minnesota (21):
Dallas (22):
Washington (22):
Making a trade in an attempt to improve the team and strengthen a position that has been worked two playoffs in a row is a self-inflicted wound? If that's the case then that standard might as well be applied to any team that makes any move that makes the cap ceiling tight.Out of curiosity, how many of those teams traded 3 players for 1 player with a higher cap hit after the cap ceiling was announced?
There's a difference between needing to give raises to retain talent and needing to fill out a roster, and having self-inflicted wounds.
So the answer is there aren't other teams who sacrificed depth, only to realize they can't afford to ice a whole roster?Making a trade in an attempt to improve the team and strengthen a position that has been worked two playoffs in a row is a self-inflicted wound? If that's the case then that standard might as well be applied to any team that makes any move that makes the cap ceiling tight.
I believe there is only a financial penalty in order but nothing majorMaybe a dumb question...but what happens to a team if they fail to be cap compliant by the deadline?
I'm not going to parse through every single roster move by every team and the prevailing fan board opinion about the purpose and/or ostensible effect of that roster move to try to discern which teams are starting with a short roster because they made choices about shaping their team, which teams are ostensibly morons for trying to upgrade a position, and which teams are starting with a short roster for the hell of it.So the answer is there aren't other teams who sacrificed depth, only to realize they can't afford to ice a whole roster?