Given the success rate of players drafted in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th oy DD, etc., and people advocate trading Robertson or Lilly for these types of returns, is to me silly. Neither player has played enough games to be considered finished products, and each has displayed talent in areas we are considered deficient. You find out what you have. I’ve been a Keefe apologist in the past, but with respect to player development…it was not his strong suit. If one wants to be angry, be angry at our stars. Our young talent should be encouraged to help future opportunities, and allow us a chance to see what a finished product looks like. TL has played less than 200 games, and yet is a player who I’ve watched improve Year after year. Dominant, no…intriguing, yes. NR, 80 games? And considered a fully developed player??? No! He scores better than most. Not a bad trait to have, and while still but 22, he’s improving as a NHL winger. And people want to wait on the equivalent 5 year development program - less, if fewer injuries, for that next 2nd round pick to develop into Robertson today? Folks, our window is closing. Trust your gut and go with the youngsters, PAC ain’t it.