thusk
Registered User
1-Treliving or Bérubé didn't sign , gave a NMC and gave the C to tavares. It was Dubas/Keefe.Yes, it is a business. In that business you want to attract and retain top talent. That talent sees how you treat your players. Giving a player the C and NMC clause and the pressuring them to waive it is not a good business move.
You get much more for Marner in a deal than you would for Tavares. I would choose to move Marner. I also feel like he is a negative contributor to culture here.
You post his playoff stats. I countered with a breakdown of early vs later in the series. His stats drop the most of the core four as the game become more meaningful. JT's actually get better in the back half of series.
2- To move jt or event marner, he still need to accept it whatever what... so not sure what's the deal here
3- Yes for sure marner value is higher than JT but jt contract is like also by far worst than marner contract for a guy who just becoming worst year after year. Leafs dont necessairly need the value im return of marner, but more the salary cap to upgrade the D with couple of good option on market.
4-being trash 4 and be better 3 game for me its not different than being good 4 game and struggling 3 game. At the end whatever what' you need to win 4 game.
5- and thats dropping rwg vs playoff, it is really marner fault if he was producing more than nylander or jt in reg?!?!?! We can talk about salary yeah but next season salary will be basically the same for those 3.