Im not a strong advocate of Carrier but he would be at worst a second pairing guy on the Leafs.
Peeke is 7-8 on the Jackets so a club has to totally ignore this season's results and hope he is the guy from the previous two years, one of which he led the NHL in minus (15 worse than the next CBJ.) His main partner for 52 games last year was Gavrikov who managed to be a -8 so he was clearly getting shelled in his other usage. We take that particular stat with a huge grain of salt because the team was in free fall after the LA trade and if you are their big minutes guy you are going to be a big minus but they were so bad at the end, how can you pull anything strongly positive from that tire fire? The remaining goalies had a GAA of 4 so the club was not able to prevent anything. Can't tell what he is there.
The year before when they didn't suck, was his first full season in the show and his shot based metrics were better, but not great, beside Werenski. That year, to me, is the strand of hope because he was practically a rookie and was handling top 4 minutes. including the pk.
He doesn't have much of a track record of success. He might be much better than than what we have seen in Columbus but he is a reclamation project at best and not someone you spend to bring in and find a role for. If he was making $1M per you could do it but retention costs and he doesn't really solve their RD issues. They need a top pair filler beside Rielly to push TJ down, not someone at the bottom.
Carrier is small and doesn't hit much but he isn't no contact like Mo and Brodie. He doesn't avoid taking hits or blocking shots and takes a lot of D zone starts. #3 in pk ice time and doesn't score much but all his pts are ES. His icetime is low but he gets no pp so that doesn't mean his 18:17 is sheltered 3rd pairing. His shot based metrics are good for being on a club with a negative goal differential, and they would be better if he wasn't playing with Lauzon as a regular partner. He is the much safer option, and while I prefer Tanev who seems tailor made, this kid only makes $2.5M and should cost fewer assets. Unlike Peeke, he doesn't need to bounce back at all to give them a come up on the right.