You use his cup winning season to justify Stephenson being a cup caliber 2C where he got 65 points in 81 games but Kadri's 100 point pace his cup winning season is just a fluke but Stephenson gets a pass though right?
You seem to be losing track of what we're talking about here.
I said that a 53 point center that's below average defensively and gets suspended a lot was not an ideal cup caliber 2C.
You disagreed and said that it was an ideal cup caliber 2C, and we should look at the 2Cs that cup winning teams had.
So we did, and it showed that every 2C in recent history was better than non-fluke-year Kadri in the year the team won.
Now you're talking about Kadri's abnormal fluke season, and Stephenson's pace in other years, which is irrelevant to the discussion.
We're comparing usual Kadri - what we made the decision on - to the 2C performances that win a cup, to see whether it was reasonable for us to seek an upgrade.
Without the knowledge that Kadri would abnormally double his pace of production in one random season, it was reasonable.
Hyman took over 200 faceoffs for us one season.
Hyman had faceoffs almost entirely from the penalty kill, and Stamkos in a below average year was taking 3-4 times more faceoffs than Hyman did at his peak.
Stamkos actually took among the most faceoffs on his team those years. He in fact took more faceoffs per game than Point those years. Not close to the same thing.
Cirelli had 44 points in 68 games in 2020 and Kadri had 36 in 51 that same year. Doesn't seem much better. Gourde had 36 in 56 in 2021 while Kadri had 32 in 56 that same year.
It's pretty similar production, but then you add in that Cirelli (and to a lesser extent Gourde) is much better defensively, doesn't have discipline issues, doesn't rely on the PP to get his production, and also PKs, and it's pretty easy to see who's the better choice.
It's funny you ignore Cirelli in 2021 since he was their 2C but he only put up 22 in 50 that season.
What's funny is that you're trying to talk about Cirelli's 2020-2021 season while ignoring that Tampa had 3 other centers that year who were better than Kadri.
You love using Kadri's average from the years 2015-21 but when I say that Schenn and Kadri have pretty much the same career numbers you don't understand why I talk about career stats?
Yeah, because what Schenn did in other years isn't relevant to what St Louis won with - which is what we're discussing.
You're trying to use stats from covid seasons where they were inside a damn bubble and with zero fans in the building and asking why he didn't breakout those seasons when teams were literally playing with multiple guys out at times during the season with many lineup changes because of covid protocols. I wonder why it was harder to breakout being on a new team and having these types of issues in not just the league but the world.
I looked at the rest of Kadri's career, where he produced at a pretty similar pace throughout. You're trying to argue that his 2021-2022 season, where he literally doubled his pace of production by 50 points, was in fact not a fluke, and just a result of Kadri's situation changing, but literally nothing about Kadri's situation meaningfully changed from previous or future years where he had his usual production.
That's from his last season in Toronto
That's actually their projection for the next year based on a 3 year weighted average, and issues with those player cards aside, that says he wasn't good defensively, like I said.
That's who we traded for and stole from Pittsburgh to expose in the draft to protect this next guy
I'm not sure what you think McCann has to do with literally anything we're talking about, but for the record, we did not protect Kerfoot.