Trades and Free Agency - 2022 Off-season

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't get why they can't just run:

XXX-Matthews-Nylander
Bunting-Tavares-Marner

And then flip Marner and Nylander as needed and obviously they all see time together on the powerplay. Matthews and Marner is known to work, Marner and Tavares has worked, why not try it. Best case scenario, Marner can unlock first year Tavares, worst-case, you have what you have now.

Bunting Matthews Willy is a great combo

Unfortunately it will never happen because it's basically what babs ran and we can't have it getting out that babs had good ideas

Not to mention it would hurt AMs stats and our leadership isn't good enough to sell him on why self sacrifice is good for the team
 
Bunting Matthews Willy is a great combo

Unfortunately it will never happen because it's basically what babs ran and we can't have it getting out that babs had good ideas

Not to mention it would hurt AMs stats and our leadership isn't good enough to sell him on why self sacrifice is good for the team

This post is incredibly dramatic.
 
Bunting Matthews Willy is a great combo

Unfortunately it will never happen because it's basically what babs ran and we can't have it getting out that babs had good ideas

Not to mention it would hurt AMs stats and our leadership isn't good enough to sell him on why self sacrifice is good for the team

Do you mean Hyman-Matthews-Nylander.

Bunting only joined last year.

Maybe:

Jarnkrok-Kerfoot-Nylander - a remake of the Galchenyuk-Kerfoot-Nylander playoffs line?
 
Yes, Robertson 1 point in 43 minutes over 10 games doesn't scream ready. However, I doubt his 9 minutes a night was spent with 2nd. liners. It did let him know how far he has to go to play against NHL players.

I don't see Kerfoot playing on the 4th. line though.

Yeah, maybe Robertson could be a triggerman for Tavares, and maybe a lighter Tavares could get to puck quicker to feed Robertson?

Really, Jarnkrok and Nylander can and have played their off-wings so I think they could work with almost any centerman.
The 43 minutes was Robertson's minutes played with Nylander. He played 102 minutes total. I like the idea of Robertson and Tavares - I just don't have faith in Tavares to become quicker.

I agree with Kerfoot probably not playing on the 3rd line but I don't love him with either of the players I have in the middle 6. I could see:

Robertson-Tavares-NAK
Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander
Anderson-Kampf-Jarnkrok

Swapping Jarnkrok/Engvall as you suggested above would work as well.
 
The 43 minutes was Robertson's minutes played with Nylander. He played 102 minutes total. I like the idea of Robertson and Tavares - I just don't have faith in Tavares to become quicker.

I agree with Kerfoot probably not playing on the 3rd line but I don't love him with either of the players I have in the middle 6. I could see:

Robertson-Tavares-NAK
Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander
Anderson-Kampf-Jarnkrok

Swapping Jarnkrok/Engvall as you suggested above would work as well.
I'd consider flipping Jarnkrok and Engvall. Engvall and Kampf work so well together.

Honestly, I'd wait to see how Knies/Robertston do on the LW to Matthews-Nylander before making and trades for a top 6 forward. The solution could very well be internal. I agree though I'd still trade Kerfoot (I'd keep Holl, he's underrated around these parts but he's a solid D-man).
I more so meant adding someone on a 1 year deal from UFA but overall I agree with what you're saying.
 
Do you mean Hyman-Matthews-Nylander.

Bunting only joined last year.

Maybe:

Jarnkrok-Kerfoot-Nylander - a remake of the Galchenyuk-Kerfoot-Nylander playoffs line?

Yes that's why I said similar

You're replacing Hyman with bunting

This post is incredibly dramatic.

Why hasn't it been done since babs in that case since it appears to be the better fit for both JT and Willys game and therefore help us as a team?
 
The 43 minutes was Robertson's minutes played with Nylander. He played 102 minutes total. I like the idea of Robertson and Tavares - I just don't have faith in Tavares to become quicker.

I agree with Kerfoot probably not playing on the 3rd line but I don't love him with either of the players I have in the middle 6. I could see:

Robertson-Tavares-NAK
Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander
Anderson-Kampf-Jarnkrok

Swapping Jarnkrok/Engvall as you suggested above would work as well.

Thanks, I missed that. 1 point in 102 minutes over 10 games. :help: Might be okay for a grunt, but not for a player who is supposed to produce.
 
Thanks, I missed that. 1 point in 102 minutes over 10 games. :help: Might be okay for a grunt, but not for a player who is supposed to produce.

That's why a line of Robertson-JT-Marner makes sense.

He'll get a lot of scoring opportunity and chances to boost confidence
 
If we were really dead set on splitting Tavares/Nylander and spreading things out as much as possible, best bet would probably be to go with something like...

X - Matthews - Marner
Bunting - Tavares - Jarnkrok
Robertson - Kerfoot - Nylander
Engvall - Kampf - NAK

X being whichever of Anderson, Malgin, Steeves, or Holmberg looks best with Matthews/Marner. And then when Knies came over, he'd replace them and switch spots with Bunting.
 
Why hasn't it been done since babs in that case since it appears to be the better fit for both JT and Willys game and therefore help us as a team?
I think optimum is to have your best setup man with your best scorer. To an extent Marner is wasted with Tavares, as is Nylander.

Jarnkrok-Kerfoot-Nylander
Robertson-Tavares-NAK
Engvall-Kampf-Anderson
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocketman588
Yes that's why I said similar

You're replacing Hyman with bunting



Why hasn't it been done since babs in that case since it appears to be the better fit for both JT and Willys game and therefore help us as a team?
You know what, I think you're right.

it's definitely a big conspiracy to make Mike Babcock look bad. Most definitely.

1660147027736.png
 
Tavares and Nylander need to find success together, if they don't it will be the same result as every other year.
When one is paid 11 million and the other almost 7 million, they need to figure it out. By the sounds of it, seems like JT knows he’s got to play faster and keep up, hopefully that helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TML Dynasty
August is unbearable every year with everyone on holidays and hockey news slows to a crawl.

And when news breaks it never happens during work hours where it helps get you through the day it's always on the weekend.
 
When one is paid 11 million and the other almost 7 million, they need to figure it out. By the sounds of it, seems like JT knows he’s got to play faster and keep up, hopefully that helps.
I hope so as well because just as you said, when being paid that amount they need to figure it out and produce.
 
All this talk about lines that work, or don't work together, is interesting, but I thought I'd look into the actual numbers of last years lines, and look to see what actually happened. In some cases, the lines didn't get huge minutes, but I think you can draw some conclusions based on these numbers.


[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]
Line[/TD]
[TD]
Type[/TD]
[TD]
Minutes[/TD]
[TD]Games[/TD]

[TD]
xGoals %[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals For[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals For[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD]xNet Goals[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Marner-Matthews-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]48.4[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]69.80%[/TD]
[TD]4.4[/TD]
[TD]1.9[/TD]
[TD]5.45[/TD]
[TD]2.36[/TD]

[TD]
3.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Tavares-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]40.9[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]66.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.9[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]5.73[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]
2.79​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Matthews-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]554.7[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]35.8[/TD]
[TD]19.3[/TD]
[TD]3.87[/TD]
[TD]2.09[/TD]

[TD]
1.78​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]192.7[/TD]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]10.4[/TD]
[TD]5.6[/TD]
[TD]3.24[/TD]
[TD]1.74[/TD]

[TD]
1.5​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]99.3[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]62.50%[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]3.02[/TD]
[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]
1.21​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Matthews-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]127.7[/TD]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]58.50%[/TD]
[TD]8.3[/TD]
[TD]5.9[/TD]
[TD]3.9[/TD]
[TD]2.77[/TD]

[TD]
1.13​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Robertson-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]32.2[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]58.30%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]1.5[/TD]
[TD]3.91[/TD]
[TD]2.79[/TD]

[TD]
1.12​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]145.9[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]56.90%[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.71[/TD]
[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]
0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34.1[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]54.10%[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1.7[/TD]
[TD]3.52[/TD]
[TD]2.99[/TD]

[TD]
0.53​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]86.3[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]53.10%[/TD]
[TD]4.3[/TD]
[TD]3.8[/TD]
[TD]2.99[/TD]
[TD]2.64[/TD]

[TD]
0.35​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]399.9[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]52.80%[/TD]
[TD]19.6[/TD]
[TD]17.5[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]
[TD]2.63[/TD]

[TD]
0.31​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]91.6[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]52.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.7[/TD]
[TD]3.4[/TD]
[TD]2.42[/TD]
[TD]2.23[/TD]

[TD]
0.19​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]50%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]

[TD]
0​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kerfoot[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]45.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.2[/TD]
[TD]1.66[/TD]
[TD]1.99[/TD]

[TD]
-0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]46.70%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.6[/TD]
[TD]2.32[/TD]
[TD]2.66[/TD]

[TD]
-0.34​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]33.7[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]45.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.5[/TD]
[TD]3.74[/TD]
[TD]4.46[/TD]

[TD]
-0.72​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

You can pick and choose what you want out of this, but clearly Nylander, Matthews and Marner together works great. Limited minutes, but I think we can agree it isn't how we would setup lines long term.

Bunting and Marner seems to be great, whether it's Tavares or Matthews centering them. Matthews had the benefit of the most time... for that purpose, we will leave that line together. The top line stays.

Now we look at Tavares, outside of Bunting and Marner.

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]99.3[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]62.50%[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]3.02[/TD]
[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]
1.21​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Robertson-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]32.2[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]58.30%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]1.5[/TD]
[TD]3.91[/TD]
[TD]2.79[/TD]

[TD]
1.12​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]399.9[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]52.80%[/TD]
[TD]19.6[/TD]
[TD]17.5[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]
[TD]2.63[/TD]

[TD]
0.31​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]50%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]

[TD]
0​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]33.7[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]45.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.5[/TD]
[TD]3.74[/TD]
[TD]4.46[/TD]

[TD]
-0.72​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]A couple of notes. Nylander playing LW, for Tavares doesn't work. Kerfoot, Tavares and Nylander isn't very good. Robertson, Tavares and Nylander was quite good. Kerfoot, Tavares, Mik worked well too, but given what we see with the Engvall/Kampf combo, that isn't ideal. We should try Robertson/Tavares/Nylander for a more extended look

Apologies for formatting.. I'm not sure what happened. You'll need to scroll right some.

Engvall/Kampf work well together. With Kerfoot, not so much. With Nylander barely... One of the newer guys should get a shot with them.

Conclusion

Bunting/Matthews/Marner
Robertson/Tavares/Nylander
Engvall/Kampf/xxx

Kerfoot doesn't fit very well in our lineup.

If we used last years numbers, and assumed Engvall/Kampf/Kase for the xxx, our X Net goals/60 would be 3.55 on the positive.. I mean, we'd go undefeated. LOL[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Mikheyev[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]192.7[/TD]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]10.4[/TD]
[TD]5.6[/TD]
[TD]3.24[/TD]
[TD]1.74[/TD]

[TD]
1.5​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]145.9[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]56.90%[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.71[/TD]
[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]
0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]91.6[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]52.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.7[/TD]
[TD]3.4[/TD]
[TD]2.42[/TD]
[TD]2.23[/TD]

[TD]
0.19​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kerfoot[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]45.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.2[/TD]
[TD]1.66[/TD]
[TD]1.99[/TD]

[TD]
-0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited:
Just for completion purposes.. here is our D pairings, ranked by Expected net goals per 60. You can decided which pairings mix you'd like out of this. If I'm going by stats only, and ignoring that some of these had limited minutes... I'd go with to try.

Rielly Holl
Sandin Liljegren
Muzzin Brodie
Giordano

Admitting, the Rielly Holl combo didn't have huge minutes, and looking at it, probably not representative of really playing much together.

One thing though... Liljegren is good.


[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Line[/TD]
[TD]Type[/TD]
[TD]Minutes[/TD]
[TD]Games[/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals %[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]xGoals For[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]xGoals For[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xNet Goals[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]144.9[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]61.70%[/TD]
[TD]11.1[/TD]
[TD]6.9[/TD]
[TD]4.6[/TD]
[TD]2.86[/TD]

[TD]
1.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]44.9[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]61%[/TD]
[TD]3.6[/TD]
[TD]2.3[/TD]
[TD]4.81[/TD]
[TD]3.07[/TD]

[TD]
1.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Sandin-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]242.3[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]14.7[/TD]
[TD]7.9[/TD]
[TD]3.64[/TD]
[TD]1.96[/TD]

[TD]
1.68​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Giordano-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]180.8[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]65.80%[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]5.2[/TD]
[TD]3.32[/TD]
[TD]1.73[/TD]

[TD]
1.59​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Brodie[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]158.8[/TD]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]63.50%[/TD]
[TD]9.4[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[TD]3.55[/TD]
[TD]2.04[/TD]

[TD]
1.51​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]382[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]60.10%[/TD]
[TD]19.3[/TD]
[TD]12.8[/TD]
[TD]3.03[/TD]
[TD]2.01[/TD]

[TD]
1.02​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]455.1[/TD]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]53.10%[/TD]
[TD]21.4[/TD]
[TD]18.9[/TD]
[TD]2.82[/TD]
[TD]2.49[/TD]

[TD]
0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Rielly[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]810.7[/TD]
[TD]76[/TD]
[TD]51.50%[/TD]
[TD]37.1[/TD]
[TD]34.9[/TD]
[TD]2.75[/TD]
[TD]2.58[/TD]

[TD]
0.17​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Sandin-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]132.2[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]50.70%[/TD]
[TD]6.8[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]3.09[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]
0.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Giordano-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]44.9[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]46.30%[/TD]
[TD]1.9[/TD]
[TD]2.2[/TD]
[TD]2.54[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]
-0.4​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]119.4[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]43.80%[/TD]
[TD]4.6[/TD]
[TD]5.9[/TD]
[TD]2.31[/TD]
[TD]2.96[/TD]

[TD]
-0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Sandin[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]48.9[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]43.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.7[/TD]
[TD]2.57[/TD]
[TD]3.31[/TD]

[TD]
-0.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Sandin[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]38.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.6[/TD]
[TD]1.82[/TD]
[TD]2.91[/TD]

[TD]
-1.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited:
All this talk about lines that work, or don't work together, is interesting, but I thought I'd look into the actual numbers of last years lines, and look to see what actually happened. In some cases, the lines didn't get huge minutes, but I think you can draw some conclusions based on these numbers.


[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]
Line[/TD]
[TD]
Type[/TD]
[TD]
Minutes[/TD]
[TD]Games[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals %[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals For[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals For[/TD]
[TD]
xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD]xNet Goals[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Marner-Matthews-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]48.4[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]69.80%[/TD]
[TD]4.4[/TD]
[TD]1.9[/TD]
[TD]5.45[/TD]
[TD]2.36[/TD]

[TD]
3.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Tavares-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]40.9[/TD]
[TD]20[/TD]
[TD]66.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.9[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]5.73[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]
2.79​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Matthews-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]554.7[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]35.8[/TD]
[TD]19.3[/TD]
[TD]3.87[/TD]
[TD]2.09[/TD]

[TD]
1.78​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]192.7[/TD]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]10.4[/TD]
[TD]5.6[/TD]
[TD]3.24[/TD]
[TD]1.74[/TD]

[TD]
1.5​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]99.3[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]62.50%[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]3.02[/TD]
[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]
1.21​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Matthews-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]127.7[/TD]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]58.50%[/TD]
[TD]8.3[/TD]
[TD]5.9[/TD]
[TD]3.9[/TD]
[TD]2.77[/TD]

[TD]
1.13​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Robertson-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]32.2[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]58.30%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]1.5[/TD]
[TD]3.91[/TD]
[TD]2.79[/TD]

[TD]
1.12​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]145.9[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]56.90%[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.71[/TD]
[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]
0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34.1[/TD]
[TD]11[/TD]
[TD]54.10%[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1.7[/TD]
[TD]3.52[/TD]
[TD]2.99[/TD]

[TD]
0.53​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Marner[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]86.3[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]53.10%[/TD]
[TD]4.3[/TD]
[TD]3.8[/TD]
[TD]2.99[/TD]
[TD]2.64[/TD]

[TD]
0.35​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]399.9[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]52.80%[/TD]
[TD]19.6[/TD]
[TD]17.5[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]
[TD]2.63[/TD]

[TD]
0.31​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]91.6[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]52.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.7[/TD]
[TD]3.4[/TD]
[TD]2.42[/TD]
[TD]2.23[/TD]

[TD]
0.19​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]50%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]

[TD]
0​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kerfoot[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]45.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.2[/TD]
[TD]1.66[/TD]
[TD]1.99[/TD]

[TD]
-0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Bunting-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]46.70%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.6[/TD]
[TD]2.32[/TD]
[TD]2.66[/TD]

[TD]
-0.34​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]33.7[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]45.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.5[/TD]
[TD]3.74[/TD]
[TD]4.46[/TD]

[TD]
-0.72​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

You can pick and choose what you want out of this, but clearly Nylander, Matthews and Marner together works great. Limited minutes, but I think we can agree it isn't how we would setup lines long term.

Bunting and Marner seems to be great, whether it's Tavares or Matthews centering them. Matthews had the benefit of the most time... for that purpose, we will leave that line together. The top line stays.

Now we look at Tavares, outside of Bunting and Marner.

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]99.3[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]62.50%[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]3.02[/TD]
[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]
1.21​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Robertson-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]32.2[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]58.30%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]1.5[/TD]
[TD]3.91[/TD]
[TD]2.79[/TD]

[TD]
1.12​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]399.9[/TD]
[TD]53[/TD]
[TD]52.80%[/TD]
[TD]19.6[/TD]
[TD]17.5[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]
[TD]2.63[/TD]

[TD]
0.31​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]50%[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]1.4[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]
[TD]2.47[/TD]

[TD]
0​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nylander-Tavares-Mikheyev[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]33.7[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[TD]45.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.5[/TD]
[TD]3.74[/TD]
[TD]4.46[/TD]

[TD]
-0.72​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]A couple of notes. Nylander playing LW, for Tavares doesn't work. Kerfoot, Tavares and Nylander isn't very good. Robertson, Tavares and Nylander was quite good. Kerfoot, Tavares, Mik worked well too, but given what we see with the Engvall/Kampf combo, that isn't ideal. We should try Robertson/Tavares/Nylander for a more extended look

Apologies for formatting.. I'm not sure what happened. You'll need to scroll right some.

Engvall/Kampf work well together. With Kerfoot, not so much. With Nylander barely... One of the newer guys should get a shot with them.

Conclusion

Bunting/Matthews/Marner
Robertson/Tavares/Nylander
Engvall/Kampf/xxx

Kerfoot doesn't fit very well in our lineup.

If we used last years numbers, and assumed Engvall/Kampf/Kase for the xxx, our X Net goals/60 would be 3.55 on the positive.. I mean, we'd go undefeated. LOL[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Mikheyev[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]192.7[/TD]
[TD]35[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]10.4[/TD]
[TD]5.6[/TD]
[TD]3.24[/TD]
[TD]1.74[/TD]

[TD]
1.5​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kase[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]145.9[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]56.90%[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]2.71[/TD]
[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]
0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Nylander[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]91.6[/TD]
[TD]22[/TD]
[TD]52.10%[/TD]
[TD]3.7[/TD]
[TD]3.4[/TD]
[TD]2.42[/TD]
[TD]2.23[/TD]

[TD]
0.19​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Engvall-Kampf-Kerfoot[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]36.2[/TD]
[TD]27[/TD]
[TD]45.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.2[/TD]
[TD]1.66[/TD]
[TD]1.99[/TD]

[TD]
-0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Players get hurt and forgotten about around here for some reason.

Much like Sandin (one of the best young D in the league last season before Pionk wiped his knee out leading to issues the rest of the way), Robertson looked to be fitting in quite well despite the lack of production and was about to break out IMO and he broke his leg.

He tore it up in the A though and I hope he gets a real shot this year.
 
Just for completion purposes.. here is our D pairings, ranked by Expected net goals per 60. You can decided which pairings mix you'd like out of this. If I'm going by stats only, and ignoring that some of these had limited minutes... I'd go with to try.

Rielly Holl
Sandin Liljegren
Muzzin Brodie
Giordano

Admitting, the Rielly Holl combo didn't have huge minutes, and looking at it, probably not representative of really playing much together.

One thing though... Liljegren is good.


[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Line[/TD]
[TD]Type[/TD]
[TD]Minutes[/TD]
[TD]Games[/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals %[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]xGoals For[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]xGoals For[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xGoals Against[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]xNet Goals[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Per 60 Minutes[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]144.9[/TD]
[TD]41[/TD]
[TD]61.70%[/TD]
[TD]11.1[/TD]
[TD]6.9[/TD]
[TD]4.6[/TD]
[TD]2.86[/TD]

[TD]
1.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]44.9[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]61%[/TD]
[TD]3.6[/TD]
[TD]2.3[/TD]
[TD]4.81[/TD]
[TD]3.07[/TD]

[TD]
1.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Sandin-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]242.3[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]65%[/TD]
[TD]14.7[/TD]
[TD]7.9[/TD]
[TD]3.64[/TD]
[TD]1.96[/TD]

[TD]
1.68​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE][/TD]

[TD]Giordano-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]180.8[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]65.80%[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]5.2[/TD]
[TD]3.32[/TD]
[TD]1.73[/TD]

[TD]
1.59​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Brodie[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]158.8[/TD]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]63.50%[/TD]
[TD]9.4[/TD]
[TD]5.4[/TD]
[TD]3.55[/TD]
[TD]2.04[/TD]

[TD]
1.51​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]382[/TD]
[TD]54[/TD]
[TD]60.10%[/TD]
[TD]19.3[/TD]
[TD]12.8[/TD]
[TD]3.03[/TD]
[TD]2.01[/TD]

[TD]
1.02​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]455.1[/TD]
[TD]37[/TD]
[TD]53.10%[/TD]
[TD]21.4[/TD]
[TD]18.9[/TD]
[TD]2.82[/TD]
[TD]2.49[/TD]

[TD]
0.33​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Rielly[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]810.7[/TD]
[TD]76[/TD]
[TD]51.50%[/TD]
[TD]37.1[/TD]
[TD]34.9[/TD]
[TD]2.75[/TD]
[TD]2.58[/TD]

[TD]
0.17​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Sandin-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]132.2[/TD]
[TD]25[/TD]
[TD]50.70%[/TD]
[TD]6.8[/TD]
[TD]6.6[/TD]
[TD]3.09[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]
0.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Giordano-Holl[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]44.9[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]46.30%[/TD]
[TD]1.9[/TD]
[TD]2.2[/TD]
[TD]2.54[/TD]
[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]
-0.4​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Muzzin-Liljegren[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]119.4[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]43.80%[/TD]
[TD]4.6[/TD]
[TD]5.9[/TD]
[TD]2.31[/TD]
[TD]2.96[/TD]

[TD]
-0.65​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Rielly-Sandin[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]48.9[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]43.70%[/TD]
[TD]2.1[/TD]
[TD]2.7[/TD]
[TD]2.57[/TD]
[TD]3.31[/TD]

[TD]
-0.74​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD]Brodie-Sandin[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]38.50%[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]1.6[/TD]
[TD]1.82[/TD]
[TD]2.91[/TD]

[TD]
-1.09​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Rielly and Liljegren need to have a nice stretch together.

Sandin gets Gio or Holl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TML Dynasty
If Kerfoot is dealt it would be nice to see the Leafs enter day 1 of the season with ~1.8M in cap space so they can pluck players off waivers. Any of Bastian, Zetterlund from NJD or Anderson-Dolan, Andersson from LAK or Liam Foudy from CBJ could realistically be waived to start the season. I think they'd all be worth a claim.

Bastian is a big RW who hits a lot and put up strong defensive numbers last year. He can realistically play any of the bottom 6 RW positions. Bastian will be 25 in December.

Zetterlund is a big frame RS winger who put up very good numbers in the AHL and had a decent NHL stint last year. He could realistically get a look in the top 6. His offensive play driving numbers in his small NHL sample were better than anyone on the Leafs and Devils combined. I'm not claiming he's the best offensive player between the two teams but he did put up very promising results and he looks primed for an NHL breakout. He is also a positive defensive player. Zetterlund will be 23 to start the season.

Anderson-Dolan and Andersson are relatively in the same boat. Both would be bottom 6 C's on the Leafs. Both players were bad in their NHL stints last year but have very good AHL production. JAD will be 23 to start the year and Andersson 24.

Foudy is a 6'2 bottom 6 C who has played 37 NHL games. Most notably 10 games in the bubble the year the Jackets knocked out the Leafs. He has not shown anything noteworthy at the NHL level but he put up very strong AHL numbers in 12 games during his 20 year old season. For reference he had 1.33 P/G to Robertson's 1 P/G in their 20 year old season. Small samples for both - I'm not claiming Foudy will be a better offensive player than Robertson.

Edit: Dakota Joshua also fits the bill for 4C and he's signed for 2 years. He is 26 and put up very strong defensive results in the NHL last year. He also increased his AHL production by 0.26 P/G in the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: andora
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad