Salary Cap: Trade Thread # LXVI: Well..... Were waiting!?!?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,669
86,264
Redmond, WA
That would be a ton better of a trade to pull off. Marino needs immediately replaced where Petts spot is already filled.

Fingers crossed that's the base of a deal and to be honest is pretty fair. Especially when comparing Kap vs Boeser and their production not being all that different.

No, I don't think that's fair unless you're throwing a 1st on top of it and JR values Kapanen and Pettersson higher than their perceived value right now.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,669
86,264
Redmond, WA
Eh?

A 3rd isn't in line with a 2nd, but a 2nd is.

DOC is a B prospect, or at least as much of one as POJ. B- at least.

And ERod has actual value unlike Schaller.

Maybe the prospect gap value between our B- guys and Madden as a solid B is too much, but it's really not a million miles away.

The controversial part there I guess is maybe DOC = POJ, but that seems pretty fair to me.

I think this is my point of doubt. I don't know whether I agree or disagree with you. I think O'Connor is super tough to evaluate as a prospect. His AHL resume is fantastic and suggests he has more upside than what many assume, but there just seems to be this vibe that he tops out as an all around bottom-6 guy at best.
 

Flying Dego

Registered User
Apr 30, 2013
5,253
6,433
No, I don't think that's fair unless you're throwing a 1st on top of it and JR values Kapanen and Pettersson higher than their perceived value right now.
JR is one to look for players he likes vs extracting full value.

Though I don't care to add a pick to a trade like this but Hextall probably feels otherwise. Removing the Petts contract is a big win beyond this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,669
86,264
Redmond, WA
Listening to that Friedman talk, he does a good job at laying out why a trade between Vancouver and Pittsburgh is so hard. The Canucks are in a pretty terrible cap position due to Benning's time there, so a big thing they're trying to do now is clear out some of those cap problems. But on that same point, why would another team willingly take on those cap issues unless they knew how to solve them?

Friedman mentions Boeser's QO as an example of this, but they just have a ton of players who fall in this category. If you're trading Pettersson to Vancouver, it basically has to be money in for money out because of their awful cap situation. Their "money out" would have to be guys like Pearson (which I wouldn't hate btw), Dickinson, Myers and Poolman.

Speaking of Pearson, would you do Pettersson for Pearson? You save some money and add a winger who had a history of success with Carter. JR has traded Pearson once before and Hextall is familiar with Pearson from his time in LA.
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,739
34,547
Question: why are “ignored member” posts showing up for me when I don’t have any ignored members? I checked my list and there are no members I’m ignoring. Can some mod please explain? Thanks
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,525
26,044
I think this is my point of doubt. I don't know whether I agree or disagree with you. I think O'Connor is super tough to evaluate as a prospect. His AHL resume is fantastic and suggests he has more upside than what many assume, but there just seems to be this vibe that he tops out as an all around bottom-6 guy at best.

He was a B/B- before falling out of The Athletic's age cut-off. You could argue that in that time we've got a sense of his ceiling contracting but I'm not a 100% that's happened. He's had a long scoreless stint without much talent or stability, but he's shown his offence can pop. His AHL numbers remain great. Plus side, he's shown he can drive possession at the NHL level and look like a plus athlete, which I think inflates things. He pans out, he's a plus third liner due to his speed and size, with maybe the potential to be a quality top six third wheel if he processes the game well enough

I guess not every team would agree with me putting there, but I can easily believe there's teams that would. And maybe think higher of him than POJ tbh. I think POJ's ceiling looks a little more sure, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if DOC became the better player, and there's less power forwards than there all-round dmen you don't really want on special teams.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,724
21,576
Core problem that they did surgery on, then an operation on his spine for a herniated disc the same season. Pretty much missed the entire season.

Pre-injury Bjugstad would have been interesting to see here, especially with Sid after what he did with Huber and Barkov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buddy Bizarre

Gurglesons

Registered User
Dec 18, 2009
96,336
78,263
Joshua Tree, CA
last-train-tocool.blogspot.com
He was a B/B- before falling out of The Athletic's age cut-off. You could argue that in that time we've got a sense of his ceiling contracting but I'm not a 100% that's happened. He's had a long scoreless stint without much talent or stability, but he's shown his offence can pop. His AHL numbers remain great. Plus side, he's shown he can drive possession at the NHL level and look like a plus athlete, which I think inflates things. He pans out, he's a plus third liner due to his speed and size, with maybe the potential to be a quality top six third wheel if he processes the game well enough

I guess not every team would agree with me putting there, but I can easily believe there's teams that would. And maybe think higher of him than POJ tbh. I think POJ's ceiling looks a little more sure, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if DOC became the better player, and there's less power forwards than there all-round dmen you don't really want on special teams.

DOC should be up playing right now over ZAR IMO.
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
55,300
19,713
Pittsburgh
uh no way…Miller is way better, at least for the next few years, which is all we care about. He’d be a great Rust replacement too

So you think Miller who's spent years as a center is just going to stay the same as a winger. Totally ignore he only exploded being a top center in Vancouver?

The center position is filled, unless they are letting Geno walk, but in the meantime, he's going to get reduced minutes and likely on the PP too. Value sunk...
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,669
86,264
Redmond, WA
I know JFresh's chart says he sucks, but has anyone actually seen Poolman play and comment on why he sucks? His chart from McCurdy isn't horrible:



It's a bad contract of course, but $2.5 million for a blah bottom pair RD who kills penalties doesn't seem like the end of the world. I just don't know whether he is "blah", though.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
30,525
26,044
Speaking of Pearson, would you do Pettersson for Pearson? You save some money and add a winger who had a history of success with Carter. JR has traded Pearson once before and Hextall is familiar with Pearson from his time in LA.

I want a guy who I think can gel with Malkin tho. Admittedly he did for like 4 games, but I think the team should be aiming to get Malkin some help and let Carter work it out with whoever.

(I have no idea how Pearson's been this season).

Pre-injury Bjugstad would have been interesting to see here, especially with Sid after what he did with Huber and Barkov.

Bjugs played a few games with Sid and just didn't really seem to be on the same wavelength.

DOC should be up playing right now over ZAR IMO.

Possibly/probably not fit enough after a punctured lung, and then there's sidedness... but yeah, would like to see it.

Tbh, if we just wanted to fit in an extra mofo rather than fiddling with hockey trades, ZAR out new guy in would sound great.
 

Andy99

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
52,739
34,547
So you think Miller who's spent years as a center is just going to stay the same as a winger. Totally ignore he only exploded being a top center in Vancouver?

The center position is filled, unless they are letting Geno walk, but in the meantime, he's going to get reduced minutes and likely on the PP too. Value sunk...

he was good as a winger too. He’s been a better goal scorer lately and not just on the PP, which is what we need…he won’t get PP1 opportunities this season with the Pens but there aren’t many of those in the playoffs anyway…but he would be a Rust replacement on PP next season
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,724
21,576
I can’t overstate how shitty Poolman is
Which is odd because I really liked his game when he was with Winnipeg. He was even someone i had on our trade or sign radar. But then he gets paid, goes to Van city, and stinks. He could just need a change of scenery. That said, I would give him the benefit of the doubt initially and let him prove himself. Lord knows if there was ever a place for a dman to come here and find his game again, it's here.
He was a B/B- before falling out of The Athletic's age cut-off. You could argue that in that time we've got a sense of his ceiling contracting but I'm not a 100% that's happened. He's had a long scoreless stint without much talent or stability, but he's shown his offence can pop. His AHL numbers remain great. Plus side, he's shown he can drive possession at the NHL level and look like a plus athlete, which I think inflates things. He pans out, he's a plus third liner due to his speed and size, with maybe the potential to be a quality top six third wheel if he processes the game well enough

I guess not every team would agree with me putting there, but I can easily believe there's teams that would. And maybe think higher of him than POJ tbh. I think POJ's ceiling looks a little more sure, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if DOC became the better player, and there's less power forwards than there all-round dmen you don't really want on special teams.
Okay, well what's the grading scale? A, B, C, D, F? I generally say A is your blue-chip, B is your long-shot hopefuls, and C is your AHL/ECHL journeymen.

I would put DOC in the A- category though because I think he's damn near a lock to be, at the very least, a bottom 6 regular on par with ZAR. That said, I do believe he has the potential to be more if only he could get the roster slot. He's not a fancy name and he doesn't get the "draft pedigree" perk so it will be tough to project "value" to the rest of the teams. Probably more valuable to us than in a trade unless someone in the receiving team has experience with him.
Can we do Schenn instead of Poolman? I'd add a bit more from us if they'd work with it.
Yes please.

I do hope Hextall does something soon. Looking at the rest of the season, if you wait until TDL time you aren't giving guy a ton of time to find their groove before the playoffs. I would love to have a new guy beginning to gel right around now and not mid-April.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad