Brady doesnt only play one way though... He is one of the hardest players in the league. Only two players in the league had 70 + points and 100 + Pims. He is a league leader in hits. You talk about bias but then you dont even acknowledge this....
You seem to be confusing a really talented player playing to the best of their abilities with leadership.
Karlsson doesnt really train in the summer, he doesnt really need to but to suggest he is some off ice dynamo is not true.. Brady has some of the best off ice habits in the league. Again you are confusing natural talent with work ethic. They arent the same thing.
I know who works out because I have connections to the organization and I have friends who are very close to Karlsson. He simply doesnt need to.
I never said Karlsson was a bad leader but he isnt the type of guy who goes out of his way in how he treats the trainers and staff. He doesnt go out of his way to support in the community. He has his own separate circle of friends he doesnt hang out with many of his teammates away from the rink.
You dont have to believe me I dont really care. But this is how it is whether you want to believe it or not.
If you separate hockey into two things, offensive and defensive, Brady clearly only plays one way. The team as a whole is like that too, almost like they follow his lead because he is the most extreme example, as captain no less. I like the hitting, but it doesn't excuse the lack of defensive play. We are losing games because of the lack of defensive play, no matter how much this team scores or hits.
Brady likes playing offense and hitting, so he does those things. He does not like playing defense, so he does not do it. Do you think that's setting a good example for leadership when that is the very thing that is keeping this uber-talented team from becoming a serious team?
I'm not basing it on just their natural ability. I'm basing it on their poise, their personal ability to raise their games in rough spots and have that translate to the team elevating their game, and on-ice accountability for how their team is playing. These are things that lead to winning results.
But incredible ability is actually a leadership trait as well. No one followed Caesar or Alexander because they were chumps; they had incredible ability that made their soldiers believe they could do anything since their leader could do anything. Awe is powerful inspiration. Karlsson's teams definitely had more of a winning edge and mentality than Brady's teams, despite Brady's teams being much more talented. You seem to put leadership in a small, tidy box when it is many things.
As for working out, I have not seen a single Brady season where he looked visibly in better shape than EK. And yes, EK probably has a natural advantage, but the idea that he must not go hard in the gym at all is unrealistic. It's like the person who aces the test and says they didn't study. It's BS.
"I never said Karlsson was a bad leader, but he isn't the type of guy who goes out of his way in how he treats the trainers and staff. He doesn't go out of his way to support in the community. He has his own separate circle of friends and doesn't hang out with many of his teammates away from the rink."
Jordan didn't do that either, and he is arguably the greatest, most winning leader in sports history. Maybe leadership is more than the small little box you see it as?