Trade Rumours and Proposals: Part XXXIV
- Thread starter OmniSens
- Start date
- Status
Iggy77
Registered User
If we acquire RoR we move Turris to the wing.
If Spezza gets injured again (let's face it that back will always be a concern) we'll have a much better #1,#2 then what we have now.
If Spezza gets injured again (let's face it that back will always be a concern) we'll have a much better #1,#2 then what we have now.
Qward
Because! That's why!
ROR's ability to play hockey has no bearing on Turris' effectiveness on the wing vs his effectiveness at centre
BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
IF we're going this route, hypothetically, we need to be sure Turris is OK with this.
No point in unnecessarily angering a guy who for all purposes has been a great fit so far here.
Qward
Because! That's why!
Legend Killer
Registered User
- Nov 15, 2007
- 3,575
- 1
And Turris being less effective has a bearing on the team overall.
Turris would not fare well on the wing.
we can go 3 deep like the pens did for so long
the question isnt where he wil lfit cause we can make it work it is the price..Zibby+Weir is steep
the question isnt where he wil lfit cause we can make it work it is the price..Zibby+Weir is steep
Skrymir
Registered User
Qward, Benny... I may not post here very much, but even I know MAK is never wrong, so to argue is futile.
Royal Canuck
Taco Enthusiast
raymond and higgins have no value to us as rentals. If we're going to go down due to our injuries, fine, but we're not paying futures for a stopgap just to try to slow the bleed.
Booth is overpaid right now, but interest could be there. You wouldnt be a fan of the return though, and unless the canucks need to clear the cap space, they probably wouldnt consider it.
Booth is overpaid right now, but interest could be there. You wouldnt be a fan of the return though, and unless the canucks need to clear the cap space, they probably wouldnt consider it.
Royal Canuck
Taco Enthusiast
With Spezza, Michalek and Karlsson out, I just figured you guys would want a scorer to help get some goals.
And Erik Condra is your 1st line LW right now as well.
Depth never hurts either.
And Erik Condra is your 1st line LW right now as well.
Depth never hurts either.
Do Make Say Think
& Yet & Yet
- Jun 26, 2007
- 51,438
- 10,253
It's a shortened season and things look good for Ottawa going forward: all the injured players should be back at 100% for next year, well maybe not Michalek (I'd trade him).
A trade made for no reason other than improve our fate this season would be a short-sighted move indeed.
BonkTastic
ಠ_ಠ
We have depth. It's in our lineup right now, replacing our injured stars.
I think the issue here is that most Sens fans have accepted the fact that it's not our year. Most of us don't want to give up a while lot of anything when we know that next year, with a full, healthy roster, should be an excellent rebound year.
Gil Gunderson
Registered User
Laphroaig
Registered User
*************** just said on twitter that Sens are now the front runners for O'Reailly.
I know he's not well liked, and I don't particularily like him either, but he has been ahead of the curve before.
Either way, I don't think O'Reilly is the right fit. Cost too much in talent to get him, and too much $. We need a top line winger instead.
I know he's not well liked, and I don't particularily like him either, but he has been ahead of the curve before.
Either way, I don't think O'Reilly is the right fit. Cost too much in talent to get him, and too much $. We need a top line winger instead.
Having Spezza-Turris-O'Reilly-Smith up the middle, and Anderson-Bishop-Lehner in net are two pretty ****ing good problems to have.
O'Reilly would be an amazing addition to this team, turns us into a 3 line scoring threat.
O'Reilly would be an amazing addition to this team, turns us into a 3 line scoring threat.
Allergies are so inconvenient...
I seriously hope we're not in the running for O'Reilly, really don't have a want/need for him...
Although I imagine Z-bad could work well with Lando...
Last edited:
- Status
