If that is his price, then it seems inevitable that we cut him loose.
It's unfortunate since he and Staal have been a fantastic pairing.
Yeah, and I mean nobody was a bigger Strålman supporter than me after we got him. I was pretty much alone talking him up when we got him against the "noooo another soft eurooo"-crowd. I definitely appriciate a lot what he is doing on the ice.
But -- Anton Strålman has 13 pts in 81 games this year. Staal got 12 pts and he played what 65-70 games.
Is a 2nd pairing fantastic when it scores 25 pts in just under 160 games?
That is a downright -- horrible -- number from my point of view. Its half than the league avg looking at D's 61-120 in scoring... And these guys have played with our top unit all season almost. The top unit deserves some blame for the low stats, but we all have seen what is going on on the ice. We have almost never seen Staal or Strålman make any kind of high caliber play that creates a scoring chance for us.
Look at a team like Philly. Streit had 44 pts for them, Timmonen 35 pts, Mez 17 in 38, McDonald came in and scored some pts too. Giroux got 86 pts for them, Vora got 60, Simmonds 60, Hartnell 50 and so forth. Play those guys with Ds that can manage to put up pts in the low 10's and you gotta shave of a good 20% off their scoring -- easily. I don't think we could contend with a weak defensive D next to Staal. But finding a D that can score 30-40 pts -- alone -- playing with a top unit and getting PP time is not that hard. And with good coaching and support from Staal, that D could potentially get his D game to the level of Strålman. That would be a huge improvement for us.
Its easy to have a bit of a head in the sand mentality in relation to D scoring.
Last edited: