can this team take another step with um.....step as the 1c ? we need a 1c or if not, we need another 2c that is not like step. in other words, we need
a pivot with SIZE and SPEED
our current centermen without beever in the mix look pretty weak. i love dom moore. hes a smart pro, but hes a 4th line guy.
we need to make a deal for a centerman.
step
brash
miller
moore
not enuf.
The decision is basically Stralman or Richards. Which player do we want to keep? I'd go with Stralman, buy out Richards and have Moore center the line with Hagelin and St. Louis.
Can someone fill me in on what a "2 way contract is"
2 7 games series' and 2 zip on a wounded montreal team is nice and all, but can we compete with chicago ?
not taking anything away from these guys and their great 5 game run. but im thinking ahead here.
another step means we DONT STRUGGLE TO SCORE GOALS anymore.
we need a legit 1c or like i said, another 2c who has some size and sped to compliment step and brash and perhaps jt miller.
that and a scoring lw would help us greatly. oh and a guy who can consistently carry the mail from the blueline and qb our pp.
Our core at this point is:
Hank
Mcd
G
Stepan
Kreider
Staal
Zucc
MSL
As far as I'm concerned the only one of tht list that slats would consider trading is staal because of the up coming ufa status
Anyone else could be traded except duclair(the highest rated scoring prospect)
I think Richards HAS to be bought out. So that solves that.
Moore, Boyles, Carcillo, Stralman are priorities as UFA's.
MZA, Brassard, Moore, Kreider are priorities as RFA's.
Falk should be let go.
Diaz and Pouliot should be kept as long as they are willing to stay at a still reduced rate.
CAPGEEK.COM ARMCHAIR GM ROSTER
CapGeek Armchair GM Roster
FORWARDS
Chris Kreider ($2.250m) / Derek Stepan ($3.075m) / Rick Nash ($7.800m)
Benoit Pouliot ($2.250m) / Derick Brassard ($3.700m) / Mats Zuccarello ($3.750m)
Carl Hagelin ($2.250m) / J.T. Miller ($0.894m) / Martin St. Louis ($5.625m)
Brian Boyle ($2.500m) / Dominic Moore ($2.250m) / Derek Dorsett ($1.633m)
Daniel Carcillo ($0.825m) /
DEFENSEMEN
Dan Girardi ($5.500m) / Ryan McDonagh ($4.700m)
Marc Staal ($3.975m) / Anton Stralman ($3.500m)
John Moore ($1.500m) / Kevin Klein ($2.900m)
GOALTENDERS
Henrik Lundqvist ($8.500m)
Cameron Talbot ($0.563m)
BUYOUTS
Wade Redden ($0.000m)
Brad Richards ($0.000m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(estimations for 2014-15)
SALARY CAP: $71,100,000; CAP PAYROLL: $69,940,000; BONUSES: $350,000
CAP SPACE (21-man roster): $1,160,000
I highly doubt Pouliot cracks $3M... if he gets a 2 year deal, I think he'll sign. $1.8M/yr is fair for him.
Brassard is the one that can be tricky since he can accept his QO at $3.7M, which is a little more than what you want considering he can become a UFA. I'd like him at $3.4 on a multi year deal. Use signing bonuses as a way of making it work.
Stralman, 4 years at $3.4M would be ideal. Double up his last contract.
Dorsett: Have to cash in on him, like the guy, but he can be replaced. 4th liners that don't PK are not worth $1.6M. Team saves $1M by replacing him with Fast.
On Richards: Yeah logically he is a buyout candidate, but the team has had success since he signed... 2 ECF appearances, and a Semi where he wasn't allowed to contribute. His game isn't on the upswing, and at best he is a $5M cap hit, but how does letting him go affect the team? Tougher choice than what most think.
Boyle: This guy is valuable, don't care what anyone says, but he is valuable. He will get some very nice offers. In my opinion he ends up elsewhere on a 4-5 year deal where cracks at least $2.75M.
Zucc: Lock him up long term at $3.5M. Maybe he gets more, we don't know, but the numbers are there for him to really hit pay dirt in arbitration.
I do think Brad Richards will and should be bought out.
But I think its a tougher decision than many acknowledge. The thing is, Brad Richards is not a player fans can "brag" about, look our player is awsome he is the best in the world yada yada yada. His contract, skill set, and maybe the most important factor, his stats doesn't impress people. For a good reason probably.
But, that don't change the fact that he is a core player on this team. He plays 3.40 on avg on our PP, McD with the second highest PP time play 2.50... He is a core player in the room. He plays a lot of important minutes 5 on 5. He has done a decent job getting a certain type of players going (Hagelin for example).
At a place like this someone can throw out a statement like our PP suck anyway, just get rid of him. But I can guarantee that loosing BR would be a -- great -- concern for AV. If you loose a 4th lineer, a good pro-scout -- should -- be able to find you a half-good one for like 1.2m per. But you don't replace the guy playing 75% of your PP time and everything else that BR brings like that.
BR has 6 more year left. I don't think its a stretch to imagine that he could play like he have this year for another 3-4 years. After that you gotta have legitimate concerns. It could become an issue, even a big one, or it could not become an issue.
I think that, especially if we make the Finals but loose, that the decision could be tough to make for the brass.
Stralman turned down $3.5m per year and since doing that has elevated his game even further and is now a top 4 player on an ECF finalist.
He is going to get $4m + on open market. (I say closer to $5)
While I do not disagree about Pouliot, he'll get $3m + somewhere.
Don't forget that the Cap goes up either folks. Prices for UFAs will be 20% higher this year than they were last year
Obtaining legitimate talent without having to give up assets drives UFA prices far highere than they should be, but that is the reality.
I love Staal.
But I want to point this out. Which is one of many factors to consider:
Our team is clearly the sum of all parts.
If you take out one part without getting an replacement, we become a lesser team.
And we need capspace.
Basically, the only player we can take out and per automatic get a replacement for is Marc Staal, because of the value he would have on the trade market. I am pretty sure that we could get a young cheap top 4 D and a 1st round pick in return for him.
IF we could get a really good young PMD for Staal, this option is one in would seriously consider. Skjei, Moore, McI and co will become solid 2-way Ds in this league, but we don't have any PMD potential in the system or on the roster.
He will be a restricted free agent after this magical postseason ride ends and he will be due a rather large raise from the $1.15 million he's making now, one of the many difficult decisions Sather and assistant GM Jeff Gorton have to make this offseason.
But Zuccarello seems as essential to the Rangers going forward as any of their cornerstone defensemen, an unsung little guy who has only been No. 1 or 2 in scoring for the team in two postseasons and a regular season.
I really don't see how this team would take anything but a major step back next season if Staal and Zuccarello are dealt. Not only are they key players on the ice, but they're key players in the room as well.
The decision is basically Stralman or Richards. Which player do we want to keep? I'd go with Stralman, buy out Richards and have Moore center the line with Hagelin and St. Louis.
Looking at the Rangers commitments and the number of free agents, the Rangers won't be able to keep all of their players. Just enjoy the ride and worry about it whenever the season ends. Chicago had to trade Frolik and Bolland after winning the Cup last June. Changes are part of sports.
In a vacuum, I agree with you. However, we have more depth on D than we do at center so it's tougher to arrive at that conclusion.
I still don't know what we do with Richards. I think, if I were Sather, I'd keep him and hope he gives us two more good years and we deal with the recapture if/when we come to it.
I really don't see how this team would take anything but a major step back next season if Staal and Zuccarello are dealt. Not only are they key players on the ice, but they're key players in the room as well.
I fully agree about Zucc, but, moving might be a necessity. He'd easily bring back a #1 pick, and, while there isn't a someone who fill his shoes right away, Skjei looks very solid. It may very we'll be a case of taking a step back like the Hawks did. Yes, it could be a rough ride for a year or two of having John Moore playing top 4 minutes, with Conor Allen on the bottom pairing.
I fully agree about Zucc, but, moving might be a necessity. He'd easily bring back a #1 pick, and, while there isn't a someone who fill his shoes right away, Skjei looks very solid. It may very we'll be a case of taking a step back like the Hawks did. Yes, it could be a rough ride for a year or two of having John Moore playing top 4 minutes, with Conor Allen on the bottom pairing.