HF Habs: - Trade Proposal Thread: From Here to Free Agency | Page 55 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread: From Here to Free Agency

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
Or very Florida like, who hasn’t had a 1st round pick the last 4 years. If a team is using their 1st round picks to find long term solutions, like Dobson, to try and win now i dont think that’s a bad thing. The issue with the Leafs is they traded their 1sts for players that weren’t long term solutions, such as Carlo, O’Reilly, and Laughton.

This extends beyond that for the Leafs, the last "natural" 1st round pick they used at the draft was in 2017 (Liljegren*).

From 2018 to 2025 they made 4 first round selection, none with their own picks (and most pick were direct downgrade to their own)
2018 #29 (Winnipeg's pick) Sandin*
2020 #15 (Pitts' pick) Amirov
2023 #28 (Boston's pick) Cowan
2024 #31 (Edmonton's pick) Danford

*= player was traded away.

So yeah, that's pretty much what winning 2 rounds and setting out on a never-ending quest to find "the next guy that will put you over the top" look like.
 
Not sure they would have him spend the summer with Demidov to build a relationship with him if they were planning on trading him. That kinda indicate that they plan on him being a big part of the team in the near future.
Pretty sure players train wherever and with whoever they want and the facilities are open..
 
we secured a very good 4th liner for almost min wage because he wanted to stay here. look what those players will go for on july 1st and lets revist.
Yes, but we shouldn’t want him on our roster at all, so that makes any amount of money bad. Hes no good, he has no jam and if we want to win we need better players than him.
 
How often do we hear about a failed trade only for it to happen later on? To me, it feels like if it's known in such details, it might have died especially with the new direction?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinodebino
Yes, but we shouldn’t want him on our roster at all, so that makes any amount of money bad. Hes no good, he has no jam and if we want to win we need better players than him.
And why is that ? Texier in a 4th line role is a very good addition .
He was very effective in the playoffs too . He surely is the least of our problems .
So let’s agree to disagree
 
How often do we hear about a failed trade only for it to happen later on? To me, it feels like if it's known in such details, it might have died especially with the new direction?
Or it's to put pressure on a team to move an asset potentially? But yeah seems unlikely.
 
Can't wait for the first trade to hit

One thing for sure, I have high faith on Kent Hughes and Jeff Gorton.

They will do anything to make the team better for now and long time. If they sacrifice huge young assets, they will receive something really really good in exchange.

Last summer with Bolduc and Dobson, they nailed it and they will nailed it again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sampollock
And why is that ? Texier in a 4th line role is a very good addition .
He was very effective in the playoffs too . He surely is the least of our problems .
So let’s agree to disagree
He plugged a hole for a few weeks. We should’ve left at that. He’d be one of the first I don’t dress for next year. He’s just not good and he doesn’t help the identity crisis we suffer from on the bottom 6. He’s more finesse in a spot where we shouldn’t want it.

Yes, let’s agree to disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spearmint Rhino
4939.jpg


The source Frank Seravalli/Franklyspeaking
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad