BaseballCoach
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2006
- 21,276
- 9,605
How aboutI hope so. Anderson+ would be ideal.
- Laine
- Kuraly
- Anderson, plus
- one of Mesar or Farrell or Heineman, plus
- one of Harris or Struble or Barron?
How aboutI hope so. Anderson+ would be ideal.
How about
- Laine
- Kuraly
- Anderson, plus
- one of Mesar or Farrell or Heineman, plus
- one of Harris or Struble or Barron?
Tony DeAngeloNone of these Dmen had 60pts last year, though i'm not quite sure who TDA is.
The same fans who complain about Matheson's turnovers, will be the same one who will turn on Hutson once the lustre wears off.Agreed. Matheson has improved with MSL mentorship and his defensive flaws are being nit picked by a ridiculous level. Way too much exaggeration going on in the player devalue narrative.
100% agree. He's much better than Ghost and DeAngelo. He belongs in the conversation with Sergachev, Bouchard, Rielly, Carlson, Karlsson, Chabot, etc. None of those D are strong in their own end at shutdown ability and you can nit pick them the exact same way... if you look for it like some are with Matheson. Works in the opposite angle to Hutson... Fans drooling over his offense but don't realize his turnovers/60 were brutal in those 2 NHL games.
This is the age 30 version of Matheson. Not the age 26 version. Those two years left at age 30 and 31 on a value contract is enormous value in this salary cap for someone who is a late bloomer.
Exactly! Guys who have the puck as much as Matheson will make more mistakes. Like someone else said in an earlier post- 60 point Dmen don't grow on trees.The same fans who complain about Matheson's turnovers, will be the same one who will turn on Hutson once the lustre wears off.
Guys who have the puck on their sticks as much as they do, are going to turn it over...often times at the worst possible time.
Lane Hutson can do no wrong right now, he's the Golden Child...but it's not going to last.
It's one of this boards oddest narratives. If he played on another team and his name wasn't Matheson, everyone here would be drooling over acquiring him with his contract.It's very strange how some Habs fans thrown their own under the bus. Did the same thing with Danault and Lehkonen and many others. Matheson has earned his way up the points ladder and he's one of those late bloomers.
His next two years are insane value in this salary cap. Some fans got to wake up
Because I'm not using giveaways as a means to evaluate him or Bouchard defensively. Matheson's in-zone defense, rush defense, and defensive analytics are all much worse than Bouchard's while playing similar minutes. Maybe Matheson would be better at that in a different system or playing fewer minutes, but at the moment he is not a good defensive player.Well, how are you not giving a break to Matheson under the same narrative? Matheson has the puck on his stick a lot too!
How about you give me your intangibles on why someone like Bouchard and Sergachev are better in their own end vs Matheson? Younger with potential to mature more yes but today and in the next two seasons? Matheson belongs in this mix. He's earned it.
It's very strange how some Habs fans thrown their own under the bus. Did the same thing with Danault and Lehkonen and many others. Matheson has earned his way up the points ladder and he's one of those late bloomers.
His next two years are insane value in this salary cap. Some fans got to wake up
Nobody, not even Gervais, said that Pacioretty was a bad teammate. Gervais called him a bad person and only because of some stupid disagreement between him and Max re: training equipment.
It's one of this boards oddest narratives. If he played on another team and his name wasn't Matheson, everyone here would be drooling over acquiring him with his contract.
He gets no respect I tells ya!
I'm not going to lie, when we acquired him, I didn't have the fondest memories of the player...but I can't hate, he's been really good for the Habs.Bias takes a long time to wear off.
I'm not going to lie, when we acquired him, I didn't have the fondest memories of the player...but I can't hate, he's been really good for the Habs.
Yes, he plays too much but doesn't change the fact that Hughes stole him from the Pens.
He is so good that no team was even rumored to be pursuing him. They preferred paying more to UFA's instead of trying to acquire this stud defender. They have all seen the pig with makeup on, and it wasn't pretty.It's one of this boards oddest narratives. If he played on another team and his name wasn't Matheson, everyone here would be drooling over acquiring him with his contract.
He gets no respect I tells ya!
He is so good that no team was even rumored to be pursuing him. They preferred paying more to UFA's instead of trying to acquire this stud defender. They have all seen the pig with makeup on, and it wasn't pretty.
Satire?He is so good that no team was even rumored to be pursuing him. They preferred paying more to UFA's instead of trying to acquire this stud defender. They have all seen the pig with makeup on, and it wasn't pretty.
The same fans who complain about Matheson's turnovers, will be the same one who will turn on Hutson once the lustre wears off.
Guys who have the puck on their sticks as much as they do, are going to turn it over...often times at the worst possible time.
Lane Hutson can do no wrong right now, he's the Golden Child...but it's not going to last.
Because I'm not using giveaways as a means to evaluate him or Bouchard defensively. Matheson's in-zone defense, rush defense, and defensive analytics are all much worse than Bouchard's while playing similar minutes. Maybe Matheson would be better at that in a different system or playing fewer minutes, but at the moment he is not a good defensive player.
People needs to get in their head that the management want the team to improve and, as much as possible, impress next season. If they want to go to summer 2025 UFA with the intent to get some top tier UFA, they need to sell the idea that the team is trending in the right direction. You wont get a, say, Rantanen over here if we finish again in the bottom 5.He is so good that no team was even rumored to be pursuing him. They preferred paying more to UFA's instead of trying to acquire this stud defender. They have all seen the pig with makeup on, and it wasn't pretty.
On Chris Johnston show yesterday they were discussing possibility of Crosby leaving Pitt next summer. Said Pitt likely not a cup threat. Montreal possible destination.
But it soon finds another host.Bias takes a long time to wear off.
On Chris Johnston show yesterday they were discussing possibility of Crosby leaving Pitt next summer. Said Pitt likely not a cup threat. Montreal possible destination.
Yeah like most people hated on Markov and Subban, amirite ? Maybe.... Matheson just isn't that good, man, I don't know though. It may be a big conspiracy against Matheson, it makes sense.The same fans who complain about Matheson's turnovers, will be the same one who will turn on Hutson once the lustre wears off.
Guys who have the puck on their sticks as much as they do, are going to turn it over...often times at the worst possible time.
Lane Hutson can do no wrong right now, he's the Golden Child...but it's not going to last.
On the extremely small chance that Crosby doesn’t resign in Pittsburgh, I don’t see how he doesn’t sign with the Avs.
It’s moreso playing competitive hockey with his best friend MackinnonHe's said many times that he thinks Montréal is a special place for him and he grew up a fan, his dad was drafted by the Habs too.
The Avs are a contender for sure but he already has three cups, it's not really a Bourque kind of situation.