HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024 Off-Season Thread
- Thread starter MarkovsKnee
- Start date
- Status
BLONG7
Registered User
Habs are having such bad luck, for so long now............................Brutal.
sampollock
Registered User
People seem to be fine with him not acquiring any talent whatsoever because, you know, we aren't going to win many games this year.
Sorry, I forgot Barré-Boulet.
No interest in making a deal unless it is for a reasonable price that doesn't include of any of Habs key pieces.
sampollock
Registered User
For a Zegras, Necas, Jarvis level player. Otherwise I would only put 2nds and d likem Harris, Struble and possibly Barron on the table.
They have all of those today, they’ll still have all of them come end of August/September.
Enjoy the summer man lol
Price forbid we acquire any 18-22 goal scorers for 1-2 years instead of praying for Mesar to show fire, Farrell to grow or Heineman to develop vision - right away.
Last edited:
LaP
Registered User
Nobody ever said that. If you can get an elite player in his prime in a trade you do it. That's not what people are taking about here. People are basically advocation doing what we did for the last 30 years i.e. grab Mike Streit and Alex Hemsky and pretend it's great moves. Players like Stamkos wont sign here unless you give them 14 millions for 5-6 years,
Armia scored 17 goals last season. Gallagher scored 16. Just saying.
SOLR
Registered User
LaP
Registered User
Absolutely nobody ever said we should not go for those targets. Nobody. I would not overpay for Zegras but making a serious fair offer absolutely.
Lafleurs Guy
Guuuuuuuy!
- Jul 20, 2007
- 78,388
- 49,694
He's always been better than Marner. Even this year with his health issues he was still better.
Yes, he should be better than he is in the playoffs but at least he scores some goals. He won game three vs Boston. I don't remember Marner ever doing that. He's just flat out too talented to trade away.
Marner's a different story. You don't even notice that he's on the ice when it matters. He's been a huge disapointment. He needs a change of environment and the Leafs could use a power forward in his place. Knies looks like he could be the real deal so that will help.
Cool so we have enough scoring to compete. No need to give Perron 2 years or Sprong $1.150M. Ca sent la coupe!
Yeah, definitely need to hold onto that key guy, Cap Space.
I'm all for adding 1-2 depth vets on a 1yr deal, but also appreciate that they may prefer to leverage the cap space in trade, as they have before... Might well be that they are waiting on that opportunity to materialize and are content to see what vet is available when camp rolls around (or target a waiver addition) if it doesn't
It has nothing to do with cap space other than not giving vets more than a 2 year contract. Draft choices can be moved but defensemen should NOT be moved until HuGo are pretty confident in their ceilings.
Depends. They aren't ideal to waste as throw-ins,
However, if Xhekaj can fetch Jarvis, or Struble can land Mercer, the risk is worth it.
LaP
Registered User
sampollock
Registered User
Funny
All the experts and even KH says Habs to many prospects is what I thought.
I guess we see if that is true
All the experts and even KH says Habs to many prospects is what I thought.
I guess we see if that is true
Ca sent pas la couple avec eux non plus.
Habs have enough roster fodder to be honest.
Certainly not for the Canes or Devils in this example.
Nah man, I'm looking for some lemonade at the cottage.
If Kent could acquire Jarvis for Xhekaj or Mercer for Struble, he would have agreed long time ago. Like he wouldn’t even negotiate. He’d just say yes and finalize the trade before the other GM gets fired.
I still see Kent making a move for a winger, or if SKA doesn’t have room for Demidov, we sign him.
- Status
