Habby4Life
First pick overall goes to the Montreal Canadiens
- Nov 12, 2008
- 4,499
- 4,298
No problem trading Dach. He isn’t going to be the 2c anyway, he is lazy and soft.
Probably the oppositeMontreal would need to add another big asset for Columbus not to laugh at the offer
1 trade won't be enough to stop us from having a top pick.I wonder what if management has a trade in mind. On one hand, another high pick would be very helpful long term, but on the other hand, the way they're playing is very concerning. They a stabilizing presence both up front and in defense. Monahan and Savard did that last year. Savard's game has gone down the drain though. It's too bad Trouba would never waive to come here because I find he'd be able to do that job.
I'm not sure opening a hole in our LD depth for another RD who can't play D is a good idea. Send them Barron or Mailloux, I have no issues with it....
Roy + Engstrom for Jiricek?
How are both Roy and Engstrom enough for a RH Defenseman drafted in the top 6.... You will need to add Calgary first round pick.I'm not sure opening a hole in our LD depth for another RD who can't play D is a good idea. Send them Barron or Mailloux, I have no issues with it.
Maybe, then I feel comfortable in not trying to up the ante higher than that. If it's not good enough, pass. I feel like the draft pedigree has been lost, all that is left with Jiricek is another management issue in convincing him his game is not NHL caliber, and he needs to learn. Like... Barron, without the concussion.How are both Roy and Engstrom enough for a RH Defenseman drafted in the top 6.... You will need to add Calgary first round pick.
He’s looked good enough to be the no. 2 center when healthy but he’s struggles with injuries and has a large cap hit. Not surprised to hear they’d move him.I don't know how he's looked in the NHL but was a fan of him at Michigan and he always seem to give Laval trouble back when he was in the AHL.
Jiricek was drafted by the last GM. Waddell may not have any use for him. Lindstorm they would likely want a lot for and if they didn't other GM's should wonder why.Instead of rebalancing the proposal I will simply add this:
The reasons why CBJ liked Jiricek and Lindstrom (and liked them more than other prospects they could’ve picked!) haven’t changed. To entice them to give those sorts of prospects up requires a partner to offer even more attractive players/assets/cap benefits.
To get both of them from CBJ would require Demidov+Reinbacher+… and we don’t even want those two prospects so badly. It’s a total no go.
He’s looked good enough to be the no. 2 center when healthy but he’s struggles with injuries and has a large cap hit. Not surprised to hear they’d move him.
Those are the only type of trades that are seen prior to deadline except for the rare exceptions of Seth Jones for Johanssen type deal.Lots of teams want to "trade to improve", but I suspect only the Penguins will actually move anything (already 2 trades from them)...and not necessarily to improve.
A better question should be why are the Jackets trying to dump a top 6 pick?How are both Roy and Engstrom enough for a RH Defenseman drafted in the top 6.... You will need to add Calgary first round pick.
Truth my bad.Not disagreeing with your assessment of our prospects value vs Jiricek, but we did not trade the Ritchie pick.
We traded the 31st that ended up being Gulyayev, Ritchie was 27 so he would not have made it anyway. We could argue a trade up like this year to nab him Musty or Perreault could’ve been better though (had Ritchie 12 so would’ve preferred him)
This argument is so tiredWhy? What’s the historical probability those picks ever play a single NHL game?
Not sure that makes sense more than Norris to Nashville.Jiricek to Nashville I bet
I don't know how he's looked in the NHL but was a fan of him at Michigan and he always seem to give Laval trouble back when he was in the AHL.