HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024-25 Season

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
Bruins rebuilt 2005-2008 and were contending after. Penguins 2001-2006 and were contending after. Tampa was a bit unique but they weren’t ever rebuilding for longer then three years during the late 2000’s/early 2010’s. Chicago rebuilt 2005-2008. The only team I can think of that had any real success in the salary cap era, and somebody can correct me if I’m wrong, that spent more then 5 years rebuilding were the Oilers. And they got lucky winning a lottery with McDavid. Most teams that spend longer then that 3-5 year risk developing a losing culture like the Sabres. If you use the same logic our fans use that the 21/22 season doesn’t count as part of the rebuild on the teams I mentioned, you can argue some of those teams rebuild even faster then I mentioned.
There's the Avs, that's about it.

Maybe one could include the Canes but it's very murky then.

The problem is HuGonites starts the rebuild on a very firm date that makes no real sense and start every other rebuild on arbitrary dates that don't fit their own criteria. Why should HuGo get the benefit of their "rebuild" announcement and not other teams?

A team like the Sabres have been losing for 16 years but in that span, they've had 4 GMs.

Their situation isn't that different than us, going back to 1997 and it's not that different than us since 2014 /Carey Price induced contending years. It's very tough to navigate all this, just like the Mcdavid acquisition. We got a top 5 of all time goaltender with a 5th overall, the Sabres got Eichel, a very good player, who quit on them (for good or bad, not debating this.)
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,185
16,869
Montreal
There's the Avs, that's about it.

Maybe one could include the Canes but it's very murky then.

The problem is HuGonites starts the rebuild on a very firm date that makes no real sense and start every other rebuild on arbitrary dates that don't fit their own criteria. Why should HuGo get the benefit of their "rebuild" announcement and not other teams?

A team like the Sabres have been losing for 16 years but in that span, they've had 4 GMs.

Their situation isn't that different than us, going back to 1997 and it's not that different than us since 2014 /Carey Price induced contending years. It's very tough to navigate all this, just like the Mcdavid acquisition. We got a top 5 of all time goaltender with a 5th overall, the Sabres got Eichel, a very good player, who quit on them (for good or bad, not debating this.)
The problem is that HuGo inherited a barren offensive pipeline and an overall prospect pool with no elite talent, along with almost 40 million dollars tied to bottom 6 players and bottom pairing dmen.

The habs under 25 offensive depth was literally Suzuki, Caufield, Roy.

Sure the D pipeline was deep, but there was no elite talent and Dman notoriously have long development curves. At the time HuGo took over none of their notable D prospects played any nhl games

When you look at the 3 drafts they’ve participated in, there aren’t any players drafted who have been massive game changers for their clubs.

The reality is that you need good players to improve. The best way to get these are in the draft. It’s entirely unrealistic to expect the rebuild to take off in 3 drafts when 1. There hasn’t been any draftee in those three years that has burned the league 2. Your club had no elite talent in the pipeline with very little depth.

This rebuild was always going to be a slog because the team was missing key pieces everywhere
 
Last edited:

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
The problem is that HuGo inherited a barren offensive pipeline and an overall prospect pool with no elite talent, along with almost 40 million dollars tied to bottom 6 players and bottom pairing dmen.

The habs under 25 offensive depth was literally Suzuki, Caufield, Roy.

Sure the D pipeline was deep, but there was no elite talent and Dman notoriously have long development curves. At the time HuGo took over none of their notable D prospects played any nhl games

When you look at the 3 drafts they’ve participated in, there aren’t any players drafted who have been massive game changers for their clubs.

The reality is that you need good players to improve. The best way to get these are in the draft. It’s entirely unrealistic to expect the rebuild to take off in 3 drafts when 1. There hasn’t been any draftee in those three years that has burned the league 2. Your club had no elite talent in the pipeline with very little depth.

This rebuild was always going to be a slog because the team was missing key pieces everywhere
Guhle is literally a top pair D and was drafted two years prior to their arrival.

They got two core pieces, including, IMO, the two best ones in Suzuki and Guhle plus two top 6 wingers in Roy and Cole. You can't just ignore 60% of the rebuild because of an arbitrary date.
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,185
16,869
Montreal
Guhle is literally a top pair D and was drafted two years prior to their arrival.

They got two core pieces, including, IMO, the two best ones in Suzuki and Guhle plus two top 6 wingers in Roy and Cole. You can't just ignore 60% of the rebuild because of an arbitrary date.
Guhle, Suzuki, Caufield, Roy is not enough enough to go anywhere. Their talent is good enough to make up for the holes in the rest of the lineup.

Like I said, no elite talent. Roy is still in the ahl.

You’re just reinforcing my point about how much work needed and still needs to be done.
 

StCaufield

Registered User
Mar 14, 2022
2,469
2,307
No he's not and no evidence ever showed he was a bargain as a 2-3. He always was a 3rd pairing D.

PP minutes are what boosts his minutes, he plays nearly 4 minutes on the PP.


3.5 for one year isnt bad. Just a bit of a puzzle to fit him on the cap.
Don’t forget it’s your opinion not a fact. Matheson a 3rd pairing is absurd. Second I can see. I think every gm in the league would laugh if someone said he’s a third pair d man or border 7th. He could fetch a first no problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
Guhle, Suzuki, Caufield, Roy is not enough enough to go anywhere. Their talent is good enough to make up for the holes in the rest of the lineup.

Like I said, no elite talent. Roy is still in the ahl.

You’re just reinforcing my point about how much work needed and still needs to be done.
Suzuki is a top 15 C in the NHL at worst. Give it up with the no elite piece lol. That's so 2021.

Its not about the rebuild being done, it's about the stepping stones being there much earlier than the HuGo dates. You can't just ignore 3 of your 6 best players in a rebuild, that's crazy.

Its like if the Pens said they started their rebuild the day they drafted Staal in 06 with the hiring of Shero. It makes absolutely no sense.
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,185
16,869
Montreal
Suzuki is a top 15 C in the NHL at worst. Give it up with the no elite piece lol. That's so 2021.

Its not about the rebuild being done, it's about the stepping stones being there much earlier than the HuGo dates. You can't just ignore 3 of your 6 best players in a rebuild, that's crazy.

Its like if the Pens said they started their rebuild the day they drafted Staal in 06 with the hiring of Shero. It makes absolutely no sense.
I’m not IGNORING the 3 best player. I’m saying they aren’t good enough to make up for the fact that the rest of the team has little talent.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
Don’t forget it’s your opinion not a fact. Matheson a 3rd pairing is absurd. Second I can see. I think every gm in the league would laugh if someone said he’s a third pair d man or border 7th. He could fetch a first no problem
He was a third pair D for seven years prior to coming here. He's playing 2nd pair duties right now and he is still not adequate, not even close. His defensive gaffes wouldn't just disappear if he had 4 minutes less of standing around at the blue line on the PP.

I’m not IGNORING the 3 best player. I’m saying they aren’t good enough to make up for the fact that the rest of the team has little talent.
You'll have to develop that argument because I have no idea why you're making it in response to me saying the rebuild started before HuGos arrival.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 417

junyab

Registered User
Jan 22, 2013
1,976
1,136
He was a third pair D for seven years prior to coming here. He's playing 2nd pair duties right now and he is still not adequate, not even close. His defensive gaffes wouldn't just disappear if he had 4 minutes less of standing around at the blue line on the PP.


You'll have to develop that argument because I have no idea why you're making it in response to me saying the rebuild started before HuGos arrival.

Just wanted to fact check that third pair comment. So according to TOI/GP he was actually almost always Top 4.

Pittsburgh
2021-22 - Top 4
2020-21 - Top 4

Florida
2019-20 - Top 6
2018-19 - Top 4
2017-18 - Top 4
2016-17 - Top 4
2015-16 - Played only 3 games
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
Just wanted to fact check that third pair comment. So according to TOI/GP he was actually almost always Top 4.

Pittsburgh
2021-22 - Top 4
2020-21 - Top 4

Florida
2019-20 - Top 6
2018-19 - Top 4
2017-18 - Top 4
2016-17 - Top 4
2015-16 - Played only 3 games
That's true in TOI. I don't think anyone would say he was a 2md pair D in 16 17.
 

OnTheRun

/dev/null
May 17, 2014
12,685
11,428
Guhle is literally a top pair D and was drafted two years prior to their arrival.

They got two core pieces, including, IMO, the two best ones in Suzuki and Guhle plus two top 6 wingers in Roy and Cole. You can't just ignore 60% of the rebuild because of an arbitrary date.

Because a rebuild start when you decide to start it.

HuGo could have decided to take the pick from the Bergevin's engineered season (21-22) and to signs a bunch of mediocre UFAs during the offseason then called it a day... Which would have been the same damn thing Bergevin did when he took over in 2012.

The team being bad before the rebuild started and some players drafted before that point ending up being useful pieces for the rebuild, doesn't allow you to retroactively adds years into the rebuild.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,316
58,395
Citizen of the world
Because a rebuild start when you decide to start it.

HuGo could have decided to take the pick from the Bergevin's engineered season (21-22) and to signs a bunch of mediocre UFAs during the offseason then called it a day... Which would have been the same damn thing Bergevin did when he took over in 2012.

The team being bad before the rebuild started and some players drafted before that point ending up being useful pieces for the rebuild, doesn't allow you to retroactively adds years into the rebuild.
Yes it does, you're right, but that's just a very vague human concept.

Accumulation can happen in a context of "competition", as it did under Bergevin.

If you end up drafting 1st twice in two years while trying your hardest to win, you're still accumulating. It's stupid to ignore that for PR reasons.

Also, look at the numbers of picks Bergevin had from 17 to 21. That's not a team looking to compete.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad