Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
There's the Avs, that's about it.Bruins rebuilt 2005-2008 and were contending after. Penguins 2001-2006 and were contending after. Tampa was a bit unique but they weren’t ever rebuilding for longer then three years during the late 2000’s/early 2010’s. Chicago rebuilt 2005-2008. The only team I can think of that had any real success in the salary cap era, and somebody can correct me if I’m wrong, that spent more then 5 years rebuilding were the Oilers. And they got lucky winning a lottery with McDavid. Most teams that spend longer then that 3-5 year risk developing a losing culture like the Sabres. If you use the same logic our fans use that the 21/22 season doesn’t count as part of the rebuild on the teams I mentioned, you can argue some of those teams rebuild even faster then I mentioned.
Maybe one could include the Canes but it's very murky then.
The problem is HuGonites starts the rebuild on a very firm date that makes no real sense and start every other rebuild on arbitrary dates that don't fit their own criteria. Why should HuGo get the benefit of their "rebuild" announcement and not other teams?
A team like the Sabres have been losing for 16 years but in that span, they've had 4 GMs.
Their situation isn't that different than us, going back to 1997 and it's not that different than us since 2014 /Carey Price induced contending years. It's very tough to navigate all this, just like the Mcdavid acquisition. We got a top 5 of all time goaltender with a 5th overall, the Sabres got Eichel, a very good player, who quit on them (for good or bad, not debating this.)