Sorinth
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2013
- 11,700
- 6,368
Perhaps in the summer, but right now if we trade for Dobson then the pick immediatly becomes less valuable because we will start winning more games.Dobson for Habs 1st? Is that even enough?
Perhaps in the summer, but right now if we trade for Dobson then the pick immediatly becomes less valuable because we will start winning more games.Dobson for Habs 1st? Is that even enough?
Anyone can become this team's best player. Hage could become our best player. Fowler could become our best player. Slaf could become our best player. Until they do, it's a laughable take when Suzuki is very clearly the team's best player.In your first post you literally say Dach can become the team's best player.
Well this is a fun game. In that case, I don't care about your post comparing Caufield's struggles to Dach's when anyone with a pair of eyes can see that Caufield's struggles were nowhere near as bad as Dach's current struggles.I don't care if the comparison annoys you.
As did Suzuki where he actually performed in the 1C role unlike Dach. People thought he would overtake him based off of that preseason, not lengthy NHL sample sizes.In retrospect yes. Not at the time. He has the dominant 1C size and skill, and in junior was a beast - had potential to become a 1C but doesn't look like he will come close now.
Anyone can become this team's best player. Hage could become our best player. Fowler could become our best player. Slaf could become our best player. Until they do, it's a laughable take when Suzuki is very clearly the team's best player.
I could not have been more clear that Suzuki and Dach weren't comparable as per those posts. You randomly bringing up PLD didn't disapprove of anything I said. However, me bringing up my posts where you failed to take away the main message does double down on my comments.
Well this is a fun game. In that case, I don't care about your post comparing Caufield's struggles to Dach's when anyone with a pair of eyes can see that Caufield's struggles were nowhere near as bad as Dach's current struggles.
Liking Dach and thinking he’d overtake Suzuki are two very different things. I can still like Dach if he becomes a 50-60 point player (which he still can). That’s still nowhere near Suzuki. I’m not backtracking anything, all those posts clearly highlight how I think of Suzuki more highly than Dach. That was the entire point.The spirit of your comment was not that at all and you know it, don't backtrack on what you said. You liked Dach up to the point of is injury and that was the point with PLD. You certainly thought he could be a great player so at no point was that take "horrendous" before his injury. I have no doubt you don't want to talk about a 5'7" pure goal scorer not even pacing for 20 goals after 34 games with top line ice time and PP, who missed less time, had a less significant injury and didn't lose his skating. What league do you think GMs would play a player like that ?
Liking Dach and thinking he’d overtake Suzuki are two very different things. I can still like Dach if he becomes a 50-60 point player (which he still can). That’s still nowhere near Suzuki. I’m not backtracking anything, all those posts clearly highlight how I think of Suzuki more highly than Dach. That was the entire point.
Comparing Caufield’s goalscoring struggles when he still did everything else to Dach who can’t do anything is completely dishonest that I’m not going to entertain that.
Caufields struggles were nowhere near this bad. I didn’t think Caufield was arguably the worst player in the league. I didn’t like his season and questioned his contract, it’s not the same opinions I have about Dach.You should entertain it as you were saying similar kinds of things regarding Caufield up until pretty far into the season, disregarding the season ending surgery that clearly had an impact on his goalscoring. And your point about Caufield doing everything else is moot as you yourself disregarded that same point last year. You're changing opinions as it suits you and being inconsistent.
It really doesn’t. All the posts were me disagreeing with how Dach will overtake Suzuki or him being better.The initial point is you called that take as being always "atrocious". It wasn't. Your own first link disregards the notion that it was.
Given that the pick would probably take a minimum of 3-4 years to get to Dobson's level, and that's if they even ever reach his level which the odds would say isn't even likely.The cap can be a real problem in destroying a team. With Suzuki, Caufield, Slaf, Guhle, Hutson, Demidov and maybe Laine, this team will be expensive to keep together at some point. Dobson at 25 with a monster contract, or a top 4 pick that has the potential to be an impact player for an extra 5-6 years for a lot cheaper...
There are buy-low opportunities every season. Even at 1c. Caps got Dylan Strome as FA and are rehabilitating PL Dubois as 1c and 2c on a very competitive team.I would also prefer a proven C, but this type of player may not be available. What is your alternative then? Would you say no to Cozen for exemple?
Given that the pick would probably take a minimum of 3-4 years to get to Dobson's level, and that's if they even ever reach his level which the odds would say isn't even likely.
As for the cap, we could fairly easily afford Dobson at 12m if needed even with a flat cap. But it's unlikely to actually cost that and the cap won't be flat.
I could see Demi emerge as 2c.I like Tuch, but Tuch, Laine, Caufield, Slafkovsky, and Demidov is just too many wingers.
Caufields struggles were nowhere near this bad. I didn’t think Caufield was arguably the worst player in the league.
It really doesn’t. All the posts were me disagreeing with how Dach will overtake Suzuki or him being better.
Self snitched by proving how I preferred Suzuki. Alright then lol. You should bring up Guy Lafleur to this conversation like how you did with PLD.Yes, that first link quite easily disproves that you thought those takes were always "atrocious", which is not the same as disagreeing. You were exaggerating, self snitched with those links and now we can move on.
Self snitched by proving how I preferred Suzuki. Alright then lol. You should bring up Guy Lafleur to this conversation like how you did with PLD.
You've said before that Dach might become better than PLD at a time PLD had always outscored Suzuki.
Laine, Monahan, and Heineman were all acquired via trade. Hage, while drafted by Hughes, was only possible due to a trade up in the draft. I would consider these all wins.I personally hope Hughes makes no trades since his track record of losing everyone of his trades is evident. This organization just can't get their act together no matter what they do, who they hire...nothing ever works anymore.
I'd have to see how the prospects actually handle their draft year, and I'd hesitate if the pick was #1 vs say #3 but caveats aside I'm leaning yes. But I also don't think we are drafting top-4 unless we win the lottery so it's probably moot.Fair. Damn, ok, so say we had a top 4 pick after the lottery, you’d trade it for Dobson if NYI said yes?
Think it was insinuated that it would be an offseason trade. It would really sting giving up the 1st if it's top 4. I'm fine with giving up pick #5 and potentially more depending on how much more and what Dobson will sign for.Perhaps in the summer, but right now if we trade for Dobson then the pick immediatly becomes less valuable because we will start winning more games.