Unless one of Gallagher/Anderson + goes back to CLB for Laine, I wouldn't do it
I think CLB could bite at Anderson , since he played there b4 and he had success with them a few years ago. If they bite HUGO need to listend
Unless one of Gallagher/Anderson + goes back to CLB for Laine, I wouldn't do it
They traded Anderson because they didn't want to deal with the contract he wanted. Doubt they'd be interested now.I think CLB could bite at Anderson , since he played there b4 and he had success with them a few years ago. If they bite HUGO need to listend
AND he sucked last year.They traded Anderson because they didn't want to deal with the contract he wanted. Doubt they'd be interested now.
I'm hopeful that they might potentially be interested in the Dumb Donkey. Maybe we add another piece to make the deal work.Well CLB simply hangs up if you even utter the first letter of those guy's names
this is not the best managed organisation, we never know . I I've seen stranger things happendThey traded Anderson because they didn't want to deal with the contract he wanted. Doubt they'd be interested now.
San Jose won’t even answers before hanging the phoneProposal: Wil Smith for Lane Hudson. Opens an opportunity to draft Dickenson or Buiuv at 5 if Demidov and Lindstrom are gone.
They traded Anderson because they didn't want to deal with the contract he wanted. Doubt they'd be interested now.
Yeah, yesterday proves that bad contracts can move all the time if the GM can justify it.That was a different GM and a different scenario.
Like, I doubt they'd be interested in Anderson, but the same could be said when LA traded Kuemper to Arizona.
Sure … what sport do they play?Proposal: Wil Smith for Lane Hudson. Opens an opportunity to draft Dickenson or Buiuv at 5 if Demidov and Lindstrom are gone.
CBJ beat writer (Aaron Portzline) tweeted after the trade to Mtl, CBJ had offered the same contract Habs signed Anderson to, but he wouldn’t sign, wanting instead to play out UFA seasonThey traded Anderson because they didn't want to deal with the contract he wanted. Doubt they'd be interested now.
They should. Hutson may be the better player.San Jose won’t even answers before hanging the phone
Maybe but the chances are extremely lowThey should. Hutson may be the better player.
That's an odd assumption. Couldnt be further from my perspective.It is but you can't seem to equate how a balanced team with fewer holes leads to winning hockey.
My goal from the moment we didn't finish bottom three in year two of the tank was to attempt to find a balance similar to what Vegas started with in their first season.
It's not going to work any other way we aren't miraculously going to attract star players until we find some semblance of quality throughout our lineup and start winning games. I guess you don't agree with my assessment that our bottom six SUCKS.
San Jose won’t even answers before hanging the phone
Yeah... He's got Ryder vibes. Will be interesting to see if he can put it together in SJ with the ice time opportunity he should get.Dellandrea is one I wouldve liked to gamble on, especially this cheap.
Not sure about that, he was traded before his NMC kicked in, wasn't that a way to make the clause disappear or did they change that?PLD rumors should be dead. RIP PLD rumors. never to be talked about again
Can Laine be worse than Dvorak ? I know Smiley Dvorak is popular among his teamates and was quite good on faceoffs, but otherwise…. I think a Laine-Dach-Toffoli (or Roy), could be a very good second line.Basu and Godin suggested that Christian Dvorak could be used as a bargaining chip to obtain Laine. The latter, who earns $4.45 million per season until the end of the next season, has become dispensable within the Habs. His inclusion in the trade would allow the Blue Jackets to not have to withhold salary from Laine's contract and free up an additional contract year.
He will request a trade again by this time next yearPLD rumors should be dead. RIP PLD rumors. never to be talked about again