Naslundforever
43-67-110
- Aug 21, 2015
- 4,217
- 5,025
Haven’t seen much of him… Sure misses a lot of games every year; anything chronic or bad luck there?Laine still seems like an obvious target
Haven’t seen much of him… Sure misses a lot of games every year; anything chronic or bad luck there?Laine still seems like an obvious target
if they take Josh Anderson contract then maybeLaine still seems like an obvious target
Anderson has a 5 team NTC for this up coming season and since he wanted out of Columbus it wouldn't surprise me if they are on his list.if they take Josh Anderson contract then maybe
The talent is there , but the guy takes too many games off , not a good fit in this market unfortunately. Need guys who want to really compete. At least that's what I think our team is going forHaven’t seen much of him… Sure misses a lot of games every year; anything chronic or bad luck there?
Well fun fact the upcoming season only starts July 1stAnderson has a 5 team NTC for this up coming season and since he wanted out of Columbus it wouldn't surprise me if they are on his list.
He had an 8 team list this past seasonWell fun fact the upcoming season only starts July 1st
Also what can our "kids" learn from Matheson? All our decent Dmen prospects will be able to sling the puck around just as good as him. He makes up for his mistakes with his god given skating talent , not much a guy like Lane can learn from that let's be honest hereReally hope Hughes trades Matheson now that his value is all time high and gets the best value for him, wont be able to stand another season of pbp guys stating how great his skating is each damn game.
Well now it's 5 , sucks for him . He's overpaid anyways he should be grateful to play elsehwereHe had an 8 team list this past season
Let me tell you something our kids wont learn how to play defensively or physical with Matheson that's for sure.Also what can our "kids" learn from Matheson? All our decent Dmen can sling the puck around just as good as him. He makes up from his mistakes with his god given skating talent , not much a guy like Lane can learn from let's be honest here
But I'm not trying to discredit the guy or what he does in the room or with the young players either because by all accounts he's a good pro
Laine seems like an injury away from career over.Also seems to be following in the footsteps of the guy he was traded for Mr. (i am not happy here) Dubois .Maybe trade him to LA to be with him.That way they would have been with the same 3 teamsThinking Anaheim vs Zegras would be a logical destination.
Laine still seems like an obvious target
Savard already on the third pair , Matheson is there by Default. Guhle can play top minutes. Yeah I get it we need someone better but if you get a great top 6 player on a base with Matheson , shoot him to the sun. We got him from Petry and Poehling lmao.
Im 100% sure Guhle can play on the PP instead of Matheson. Also Matheson had a season record , big chances he won't reproduce that and he probably cost us more defensively that he gives us offensively.
He's the type of asset we can trade for something good in return
If we can't build a defense with Reinbacher Mailloux Hutson Harris Guhle Jackeye Struble and Engstrom in the pipeline and a 1 vet on the third pair then the problem is not in the lineup but higher.
Well for me Matheson is the perfect option because Matheson is not good defensively and we need to get better offensively. like you said Hutson and even Guhle can play on the PP .Hutson will take care of the PP soon enough.......
The question is do they need to trade that asset to get a top 6 forward?
Cause love it or hate it, Matheson has a hell of a price tag for what he brings.
Slafkvosky, Suzuki, Caufield, Dach.
We need to find 2 more and with that 5th overall, it's probably just one more we need to find.
We have a tons of assets to make it happen, from prospects, picks to cap space and roster players.
Trading Matheson is just not the first option I would explore.....
Hutson will take care of the PP soon enough.......
The question is do they need to trade that asset to get a top 6 forward?
Cause love it or hate it, Matheson has a hell of a price tag for what he brings.
Slafkvosky, Suzuki, Caufield, Dach.
We need to find 2 more and with that 5th overall, it's probably just one more we need to find.
We have a tons of assets to make it happen, from prospects, picks to cap space and roster players.
Trading Matheson is just not the first option I would explore.....they got Dach for Romanov, I'm sure there would be better options.
If he was as good on D as he was on O, he’d be getting $10M a season unicorn. We need what he brings because no one else can do what he does on this team and he’s the no. 1 D. There are also not a lot of 60 point D anyways so he and his cap would be worth more than I think most here think he’s fetch. He’s also not nearly as bad in D as some make him out to be. He’s not a shit down D but he’s also not that bad. He sacrifices some D to make those offensive opportunities which is the trade off. If MSL asked him to tone it down, he’d be a 40 point D with much better defensive numbers.Love Matheson offensive side but he's not good on defensive side.If Canes want him for Necas you take this deal all day long .Hutson will take over for Matheson. Add Zegras and Senneke/Demidov and we are off to the races.
Matheson's value is all time high, can he have a similar season next year? Yes it's possible, but why gamble on it if we can get the best return now. I love the guy and he's a great pro, but at the end of the day I think trading him makes us better in the long run.Trading Matheson should be on the table, but it would have to be a massive overpayment leading into this season.
Trade deadline, next summer? That’s when he should be fully on the table, pending the results of Hutson , Mailloux and Reinbacher’s development.
If it looks like they’re all going to hit, adios.
I 100% disagree with the bolded. Montreal is full of shitty tabloid journalists who won't respect Laine's mental health if there's a story to sell. It's not about him handling the pressure of hockey, its him handling the microscope of the market. Anyone who is struggling with mental health issues doesn't need that added element. And if I'm wrong, and it works out, fantastic. But for reasons bigger than hockey, I doubt Laine would be better off in MTLI don't care about acquiring Laine but this whole 'If he's had mental health issues in Columbus, you can't bring him to Montreal' seems like a massive crock of shit to me if we don't even know what the issue is.
The point of getting help is to get better.
Would love a crack at him on the HabsLaine still seems like an obvious target
So trueI don't care about acquiring Laine but this whole 'If he's had mental health issues in Columbus, you can't bring him to Montreal' seems like a massive crock of shit to me if we don't even know what the issue is.
The point of getting help is to get better.