LaP
Registered User
I'd rather get a pick than Holloway. Everything point at Wawa being a better player than Holloway. Junior stats, AHL stats and NHL stats are all in favor of Roy as well as the eye test and he has better hockey IQ imo. If Holloway is behind Roy in the depth chart then he wont be very useful for us. I'D rather get another first which we could package to get something better or aim for the fence with the pick.I see zero value coming back or significantly over valuation of Holloway. I wouldn’t trade Savard for this package and I sure wouldn’t throw in Evans.
couldn’t see what people saw in Holloway in is draft year (I could see it, but didn’t think it was projectable or I just also saw a lot of issues) and I can’t see why everyone see in him right now… the guy on a entry level contract on a team that has zero depth and he isn’t able to contribute he might still improve he will likely have a NHL career but probably never will be a legit top 6…
Do we have a Desharnais quota to maintain because I can see why we want a 27yo D that a bottom pair on a team that have a weak D core maybe as a winger that could be a profile we could use as a bottom 6, but he bring zero value as D and he will be a UFA…