HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #86: 2023-2024 Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,424
25,790
He is clearly having the best offensive season of his career at 29 years old not sure it's sustainable going forward by looking at his numbers in the past so if the offer is really good like a first a second and an A prospect Hughes sould go for it imo

Matheson has never been in a role like this nor been given this much freedom to play like this, even to develop his game where he's allowed to make mistakes.

Having said, that, will his role change when Hutaon, Reinbacher, and Mailloux come in? Probably his number 1 pp time will go down. Maybe at some point Reinbacher will reduce his 5 on 5 minutes. Bit maybe not since Reinbacher plays right, and so far Matheson still plays more than Guhle.

I like the guy more than I dislike, even though sometimes I feel a crackhead plopped into a Habs jersey could make better decisions with the puck or about where to position himself. But even at his advanced age for a hockey player, I still hope he can figure out and improve his defensive game, as he's done with his offensive game. He certainly has the skating ability to be a top defender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teamfirst

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,311
17,120
Peak Petry (before his ‘trade me’ meltdown lol) was 2x the player Matheson is…I just can’t get over the amount of errors he dishes out…I don’t think you can win with a player like that in the playoffs when a single mistake can lose a game.
A lot of people seem to love him but I’m not one - first solid offer I’d ship him out.
Peak Petry was also sheltered on 2nd pair by Weber playing 1D TOI - a luxury Matheson doesn’t have
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabbyGuy

Mr Bop

Registered User
Jul 14, 2011
188
463
Earth
When was the last time any type of “haul” was paid to acquire an asset at trade deadline?

Teams simply don’t take on assets w term at deadline - term deals are offseason moves
For a haul on term:
A first and 2 seconds for Chychrun ( who was halfway through a 6 year deal).

Other big deadline deals recently were:

The Meier trade was also pretty big, with a 1st, solid prospect (Mukhamaduhlin) and conditional 2nd.

Jeannot for a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th and Cal Foote.

A haul doesn't have to be a million pieces coming over, just value of the return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teamfirst

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,760
10,745
Nova Scotia
Matheson has never been in a role like this nor been given this much freedom to play like this, even to develop his game where he's allowed to make mistakes.

Having said, that, will his role change when Hutaon, Reinbacher, and Mailloux come in? Probably his number 1 pp time will go down. Maybe at some point Reinbacher will reduce his 5 on 5 minutes. Bit maybe not since Reinbacher plays right, and so far Matheson still plays more than Guhle.

I like the guy more than I dislike, even though sometimes I feel a crackhead plopped into a Habs jersey could make better decisions with the puck or about where to position himself. But even at his advanced age for a hockey player, I still hope he can figure out and improve his defensive game, as he's done with his offensive game. He certainly has the skating ability to be a top defender.
Matheson be traded at some point. Just not sure if this deadline
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,881
129,525
Montreal
Damn it! Finally, a post that makes sense when it comes to Matheson. I couldn't believe the nonsense about trading him.

Agreed. The discourse on Matheson is unfair. He frustrates me mainly on the PP when he often ignored Slaf (doesn't as much anymore) and when he decides to shoot, more often than not his shot gets blocked.

Even then, while many will point to the fact that it's easy to pick up points when you just pass it to Suzuki or Caufield on the PP. The fact remains, he is still the one distributing the puck on those PPs.

But overall, Matheson's been solid. His defensive game isn't the greatest, but when you are on pace for 60+ pts, I can live with some other deficiencies.
 

CAUFIELD

Registered User
Oct 16, 2015
904
1,376
Savard is the one to go. Big value and old. Cash in while value is at pick and he’s healthy. We can retain 50%.

We have Reinbacher and Mailloux that will graduate on RD in the next two years . Add in Hutson . We can’t have all those player to graduate the same year. So, I think Mailloux makes the team next year , and the year after Hutson and Rein graduate. Moreover , it’s a possibility we go BPA at the draft , wish could be a defenseman. We need roster spots.

Next year defense:
Matheson Ghule
Struble Kovacevic/Barron
Xhekaj Mailloux
Harris
Matheson i keep until a defenseman shows he can produce 40 ppts + (Hutson/Mailloux)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sterling Archer

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,339
1,197
And what if Matheson has a shit year next year? You lost all possibilities to get some nice future for him (just like we did with Anderson or Petry a few years ago). Its primordial for this rebuild that Hughes trades him for haul this tdl. You can always sign a guy like Edmundson for one year for the veteran presence.

Matheson is more then just a vet presence, he's the only offensive D that the team has right now. You can trade him until you know that one of Hutson, Barron or Mailloux can step into his role and that wont happen until late next year at best. So unles the deal brings a MASSIVE return, you dont trade him.

Other thing is that comments from the players after Monahan was traded seems to indicated that loosing good players was starting to take a tool on them. So you dont trade Matheson for something that will help in 3yrs
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adriatic

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,809
12,094
Matheson is more then just a vet presence, he's the only offensive D that the team has right now. You can trade him until you know that one of Hutson, Barron or Mailloux can step into his role and that wont happen until late next year at best. So unles the deal brings a MASSIVE return, you dont trade him.

Other thing is that comments from the players after Monahan was traded seems to indicated that loosing good players was starting to take a tool on them. So you dont trade Matheson for something that will help in 3yrs
Exactly. And the massive return would have to include an A prospect ready for the NHL by the beginning of next season at the latest.
 

dinodebino

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
16,407
29,583
Savard is the one to go. Big value and old. Cash in while value is at pick and he’s healthy. We can retain 50%.

We have Reinbacher and Mailloux that will graduate on RD in the next two years . Add in Hutson . We can’t have all those player to graduate the same year. So, I think Mailloux makes the team next year , and the year after Hutson and Rein graduate. Moreover , it’s a possibility we go BPA at the draft , wish could be a defenseman. We need roster spots.

Next year defense:
Matheson Ghule
Struble Kovacevic/Barron
Xhekaj Mailloux
Harris
Matheson i keep until a defenseman shows he can produce 40 ppts + (Hutson/Mailloux)
Not enough experience.
 

Habs 4 Life

No Excuses
Mar 30, 2005
41,232
5,119
Montreal
Matheson aint going nowhere atleast not this year

Savard is 50/50 i think management knows hes well liked and brings a vet presense but for the right offer he will be traded
I don't think either of them should be moved, unless a Pejorative Slured offer comes our way. This team will need some leadership come next September on the blue line, we cannot just play 6 young d's with a lack of NHL experience. Already with just them 2 it's rough
 

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,339
1,197
Savard is the one to go. Big value and old. Cash in while value is at pick and he’s healthy. We can retain 50%.

We have Reinbacher and Mailloux that will graduate on RD in the next two years . Add in Hutson . We can’t have all those player to graduate the same year. So, I think Mailloux makes the team next year , and the year after Hutson and Rein graduate. Moreover , it’s a possibility we go BPA at the draft , wish could be a defenseman. We need roster spots.

Next year defense:
Matheson Ghule
Struble Kovacevic/Barron
Xhekaj Mailloux
Harris
Matheson i keep until a defenseman shows he can produce 40 ppts + (Hutson/Mailloux)

Similar to Matheson, I highly doubt that Savard get traded. RD is thin right now. Mailloux most likely require another season in the AHL and Reinb. still need to play a game on N-A size ice. So, discounting them for this season and most likely next, you only have Guhle, Kova and Barron.... and this is a scary thought.

More importantly is what he brings in terms of leadership. The way he play and the way he act office has a positive impact on building a good culture. Sure you can trade him and sign a UFA vet, but will that guy be as good as what Savard brings? Sometime the best deals are the one you dont make
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catanddogguitarrr

HuGo Burner Acc

Registered User
Mar 30, 2016
4,702
5,334
Damn it! Finally, a post that makes sense when it comes to Matheson. I couldn't believe the nonsense about trading him.
Yeah realistically you can't trade Matheson unless you have someone to fill the void. That's why I'd allow MSL to get his hands on Hutson next year. See if he's ready. If by the end of the 2024-25 season, they feel as though he can pretty much take over for Matheson, then you trade him.

Anyways unless they're getting a top pick for him, the only type of trade that would be consistent with HuGos plan of an accelerated rebuild is if they got a youngish elite player for Matheson+. If not then it's not realistic at all
 

xposbrad

Registered User
Jul 11, 2009
1,079
251
If Matheson can get a decent prospect, now is when you need to dump him to get the most value. Calgary is going to unload Han/Tan and get some good stuff back and drop below us in the standings most likely. If this is the last rebuilding year, then we really need to unload anyone not going to be here in 2+ years when we are competing including Savard if he can get us a 2nd or prospect.
 

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,339
1,197
If Matheson can get a decent prospect, now is when you need to dump him to get the most value. Calgary is going to unload Han/Tan and get some good stuff back and drop below us in the standings most likely. If this is the last rebuilding year, then we really need to unload anyone not going to be here in 2+ years when we are competing including Savard if he can get us a 2nd or prospect.
This is not the stock market, there is more to trading a player then just "value".
 

austin316

Registered User
Oct 4, 2016
1,451
1,738
I don't expect any activity on our end on deadline day. Our activity will happen the week of the draft.
 

durojean

Registered User
May 29, 2007
2,380
1,354
Well, they wanted to go scorched earth for their best chance at Bedard...and it worked.
Ducks are not trying to rebuild the rebuild...they just don't think he fits.

There is a off chance that the ducks would want to add a good veteran presence with experience and leadership to their line up. They are 9 millions under the cap also.

They are one of the teams that could really well want a Anderson or Gallagher, maybe even Dvorak in a deal with the Habs for Zegras and it would not be the end of the world for them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad