EXPOS123
Registered User
- Jun 29, 2010
- 1,504
- 1,869
yes, sure, like we don’t need 40 goal and 100 point players - when was the last time we’ve had one of those?Not really, IMO.
I know Nylander is on pace for 100+points and 46 goals, but a season's long and he never had more than 87 points in his career year today last season.
He reached 40 goals the nose just once and that could be an outlier for goals scored, for all we know.
PROVEN is a strong word until it is truly proven. Sounds more like words spoken by a fan boy.
Just saying...
At 11.5M, Nylander needs to become a consistent 40-goal, 100+ point player to make the cost worthwhile.
Not sure Nylander puts up those totals on a team that doesn't have Matthews, Tavares and Nylander as team mates?
Nylander, in Montreal, might be more a PPG player, topping out in the low to mid-eighties in points.
I would never pay 11.5M to such a player.
And no I’m not a fanboy.I’m a hockey fan who appreciates good players wherever they play.
For once I wish we had one of those.
If you want to see overpaid terrible contracts, look at most of the players on our team