Leon Lucius Black
Registered User
- Nov 5, 2007
- 16,013
- 6,177
Hopefully one of the 732 conditions in the Monahan trade is Calgary must keep Darryl Sutter as coach until 2025/2026.
He was worse and worse after his second season in Nashville.Externalities happen… injuries and cap crunches… Yknow?
Armia has an even longer contract and is a worse player. Maybe flipping a Hoffman or Edmundson might do it and then the Habs could deal Mantha at the trading deadline.Not much. And, they'd have to retain.
I'd do Armia for Mantha, with 20% retained (about $1.15m), and Boston's 2024 3rd round pick.
That still leaves us with a higher cap it, $4.55m, but we're compensated with one less contract year & a pick.
Also, Washington has next to no right shot forwards.
That's been happening here on HF habs for years, it doesn't even matter if the player in question is past his prime or simply a castaway from another organization.
Probably what would happen is that whoever the Habs trade will have a better season and bring more in trade than Mantha.Armia has an even longer contract and is a worse player. Maybe flipping a Hoffman or Edmundson might do it and then the Habs could deal Mantha at the trading deadline.
Food for thought since Monahan was brought up:
Is there a case to say that the Monahan deal cost us a bottom 4 spot in this year's draft (pre-lottery)?
Monahan had points in 6 games that ended up a W by one goal.
More importantly, he provided depth beyond a single line, like we've had since Christmas. 17 points in 25 games.
Removing all 12 points (unrealistic) puts us in a 3-way tie for last.
If we're looking at it from this point of view, a likely pick 10-20 OA in 2025 doesn't excite me much - quite a frustrating outcome provided we didn't get assets at the TDL. I'm saying pick 10-20 because the only way we get a top 10 pick with all these conditions, is if both CGY and FLA are in the bottom 10.
We may look back in a few years with a starless roster thinking this is where we missed out on a franchise forward. So on brand with this franchise's luck. This just feels like we won the trade but we aren't improving, like in the Bergevin era.
Of course if we win a lottery all will be forgotten and forgiven.
We could even call it Kwisatz Haderach level planning.
I don’t know how Armia’s name keeps coming up in so many fake trades. Habs would have to pay to move him, he’s not an asset. He’s overpaid, over-termed and sadly, over here (assuming Hughes will not want to cough up assets to get rid of him).
This is really an unfair post, have you been around all season?
He was only there for three years, and amazing for two of them!He was worse and worse after his second season in Nashville.
Actually Nashville tried to trade Subban away after the cup run and the next off season, too.Such a franchise player that after his third year in Nashville, they gave him away for peanuts.
Why take on a player with more contract years than Mantha, who disappears on most games? If the offer is Armia, I hold on to the turd I know and have in Mantha and create cap room right away next season.Makes him an ideal candidate in a deal for someone like Mantha.
Caps quite clearly will be aggressively trying to improve roster this summer (Ovie's window is almost closed, and unless they trade him, I can't see him or Leonsis tolerating a few years of rebuild).
They need cap space, but also to bolster their roster. A Mantha / Armia swap would create 2M$ in cap room now, while adding a bottom 6 winger that, while overpaid, is still an everyday NHL roster player.
Cap going up next few years softens the blow of the extra year on Armia's deal & no reason to expect his current level to drop off much if at all in that time
Don't be disingenuous, it's not a good look.Such a franchise player that after his third year in Nashville, they gave him away for peanuts.
"Gee this team sucks!" posts piss me off. I'll just ignore them from now on.Yes. Why is it unfair?
Easy yesQuestion on twitter and i was wondering what the answer would be here: Pick no 5 and Slafkovsky vs Pick no 2. You do it or not?
Armia has an even longer contract and is a worse player. Maybe flipping a Hoffman or Edmundson might do it and then the Habs could deal Mantha at the trading deadline.
Armia disappears most games, he hurts you in the opportunity cost of rostering someone better in his place who actually shows up and who is paid what he’s worth. I’d rather have Mantha for the expiring contract next season and on the odd chance he plays the whole season or most of it. Nobody will pay you for what Armia brings, with 2 more years to go on his deal.Armia can penalty kill, and is far better on the forecheck then Mantha. Mantha doesn’t do anything. He did however have a brilliant turnover to Malkin in a play that absolutely ended Washington's playoff hopes.
As someone else said, Mantha is another Drouin just bigger. Armia will put up around 10 goals a season & pk. He doesn't actively hurt you. He's just not a big help usually, whereas Drouin/Mantha will lose you games over the course of the season due to turnovers, poor defensive coverage and lackluster play.
Armia disappears most games, he hurts you in the opportunity cost of rostering someone better in his place who actually shows up and who is paid what he’s worth. I’d rather have Mantha for the expiring contract next season and on the odd chance he plays the whole season or most of it. Nobody will pay you for what Armia brings, with 2 more years to go on his deal.
As much as I think Slafkovsky will be regretted as a 1st overall pick, not sure Fantilli is so elite than you give up potentially 2 cornerstone pieces (assuming we take Reinbacher or Smith with #5...or if we're somehow lucky Michkov). Now if it is 1st overall, I'd even add the FLA 1st.Question on twitter and i was wondering what the answer would be here: Pick no 5 and Slafkovsky vs Pick no 2. You do it or not?
Why take on a player with more contract years than Mantha, who disappears on most games? If the offer is Armia, I hold on to the turd I know and have in Mantha and create cap room right away next season.
I just can’t see the appeal of trading for Armia, unless the team acquiring him is being significantly compensated.
Agree to disagree. I see Armia as a cap dump/ buyout candidate. What a frustrating player to roster.The why is the urgency to free up cap space to reload/improve right away. Ovie has 3 seasons left on his deal and at his age, playoffs next year will be the expectation...
I think it's clear the Caps will be aggressive this summer & moving Mantha will likely be a priority.
If they can do it without taking any contract back, I'm sure they would... But how many teams will without demanding a 1st or 2nd, or sending some other cap dump their way? They'll need to keep those assets if they want to make actual roster upgrades.
Armia, for his warts, is a better alternative to most 4th line options and can play decent 3rd line role. He's maybe 1.4M overpaid for what he brings but that amount will be less of a factor as the cap rises the following year...
For next season, Armia + 2.3M$ in cap space > Mantha @ 5.75M cap hit for a team in that kind of situation, imo
I want a winger or C in the top 5, but Reinbacher being called by some as the best dman since Yosi to come out of Switzerland has caught my attentionAs much as I think Slafkovsky will be regretted as a 1st overall pick, not sure Fantilli is so elite than you give up potentially 2 cornerstone pieces (assuming we take Reinbacher or Smith with #5...or if we're somehow lucky Michkov). Now if it is 1st overall, I'd even add the FLA 1st.
Agree to disagree. I see Armia as a cap dump/ buyout candidate. What a frustrating player to roster.
test"Gee this team sucks!" posts piss me off. I'll just ignore them from now on.