Thanks for clarifying. I prefer to bring both in if we can project our cap structure. Dubois for his prime years and Huberdeau for his 30-36 years. Personally, I value both their games and at the points of their careers. I think you are undervaluing Dubois for his prime. Probably similar to Anderson type evaluation.
How can you not like this forward group? It creates a situation where we can focus on drafting more D to improve on Guhle, Barron, Harris, Mailloux, Hutson, etc.
Slaf / Suzuki / Caufield
Huberdeau / Dubois / Anderson
Farell / Dach / Gallagher
Pitlick / Evans / Roy
Heineman, Ylonen, Mysak, Mesar
Is their young core better than the Habs? Suzuki and under? The point here is wanting more patience vs signing guys like Huberdeau and Dubois. Yzerman can be criticized for signing guys that hurts his Bedard chances and you said it yourself, it's not the same kind of signings as Huberdeau and Dubois
The point here (to be clear) is Yzerman is more open to failing with his plan vs the Habs with ours. Guys he signed this past summer vs the Habs signing Huberdeau and a possible sign/trade for Dubois.
More patience required for Yzerman even if he drafted in the top 10 for 6 years? That's the point and it just goes to show how hard it is to tank/rebuild and exit that with contending pieces
Signing Huberdeau (after the deep 2023 draft with many special players available in the first round) gibes Montreal two consecutive drafts with high picks, on top of two really young, projectable core players in Suzuki and Caufield. Huberdeau has zero impact on Landing another star forward like, say, Fantilli (no guarantees, I know, but an example not named Bédard).
IMO, a forward core that aligns, in no particular order, Suzuki, Caufield, Huberdeau and Anderson, with highly touted youngsters such as Slafkovsky, Fantilli, Dach and Roy, is ready to add a player like Dubois for free as a UFA.
That gives 9 potential top-6 players at different stags of their development for your top-9, boasting a forward depth like few teams will have and a few years to bring the younger players along, all surrounded with some veterans (some younger -- Dubois -- and some a little older -- Huberdeau and Anderson, but not 36, 37 and 38) to help in their development.
Huberdeau, Anderson, Slafkovsky, Roy, Caufield as wingers.
Suzuki and Fantilli as Cs
Dubois and Dach as C/Ws.
Dubois - Suzuki - Caufield
Huberdeau - Dach - Anderson
Slafkovsky - Fantilli- Roy (kid line)
Of course, these are all pencilled in line-ups and developing chemistry will determine the final portrait, but there are many quality C/Ws and players that can play both wings with aplomb to make this lineup highly flexible win order to accommodate natural fits between certain players.
Maybe it ends up
Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dubois - Dach
Roy - Fantilli Anderson
-OR-
Huberdeau - Suzuki - Roy
Slafkovsky - Dubois - Caufield
Anderson - Fantilli - Dach
-OR-
Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Dubois - Dach - Roy
Slafkovsky - Fantilli - Anderson
-OR-
Huberdeau - Suzuki - Caufield
Dubois - Dach - Anderson
Slafkovsky - Fantilli - Roy
0r some other combination.
I won't go beyond the top-9 because there are so many possible, low-cost options for the 4th line with real talent in the system already.