BLONG7
Registered User
Absolutely agree.............Weber was a great shutdown guy, but almost zero offense.Compare Weber’s contribution to that of Makar or even Hedman and it’s night and day
Absolutely agree.............Weber was a great shutdown guy, but almost zero offense.Compare Weber’s contribution to that of Makar or even Hedman and it’s night and day
Because if you are platooning, you need two of them.
The latter, thinking was $25M can buy a lot of therapy (remember 20-year olds in a beer bash thinking…)Bitch as in a gofer or bitch as in Bubba's plaything while he's in prison.
Sure but St-Louis also won the cup without any real generational players and it's not like Binnington just got hot at the right time given his SV% was 0.914 and GAA of 2.46 during the playoffs.
Now obviously if we have the chance to get a true #1 G/D we should do it but we shouldn't resign ourselves to tanking until then either. You can build a winner without those types of players though it is harder.
Bet you this guy would…...if that were the case, I imagine HuGo would have already moved him...Zito panicked at the Deadline and gave waaaaaayy too much for Shyterot's reputation...doubt any other GM right now would be as moronic...
The thing is Binnington was good but his numbers were actually pretty average, he played great but it's not like he carried the team like a true top tier #1 G does. What St-Louis showed was you don't really need those generational players so long as everyone is more or less "hot" at the same time. For reference there's no way Pietrangelo was a top 5-10 defenceman that year, but he was certainly "hot" when it counted.Funny you reference St Louis... That's where my post originated BC I view Suzuki as capable of matching the #1C impact ROR provided St Louis in their cup run...
That St Louis team had a top 5-10 #1D and Binnington gave them top tier #1G performance that year heading into & during the POs.
In the absence of a generational talent at any position, Suzuki & the core pieces we have in place will need reinforcement at #1D &/or #1G if contending in the next few years is going to happen... That's my perspective.
I would do it any day, but Lak won’t. A futur top dman vs at best a guy like toffoli on his prime and a bottom 6 player in mysak. Clarke been selected at 8th pickHow about Brandt Clarke for Mysak + Roy ??
Pietrangelo was concencus top 10 dman, 6th or 7th on most rankings I looked at (for whatever those are worth) heading into 2019 season...The thing is Binnington was good but his numbers were actually pretty average, he played great but it's not like he carried the team like a true top tier #1 G does. What St-Louis showed was you don't really need those generational players so long as everyone is more or less "hot" at the same time. For reference there's no way Pietrangelo was a top 5-10 defenceman that year, but he was certainly "hot" when it counted.
We're losing Dadonov, Monahan, Drouin, and Byron after this season that's over 20M$ in cap space.We definitely have to unload some forwards. I think we have more than 50 million committed to the forward positions and that's too much for a rebuilding team.
For sure. I was just thinking during the season it's hard for Hughes to make moves with so much money committed. I'm scared that committing 50 million to the forwards will hinder our chances of finishing lower in the standings. When you look at all 4 lines top to bottom it's a decent group.We're losing Dadonov, Monahan, Drouin, and Byron after this season that's over 20M$ in cap space.
The problem is that all the good teams have zero cap space and all the teams with cap space will ask for a sweetener to take on salary so we're kinda stuck with our guys.For sure. I was just thinking during the season it's hard for Hughes to make moves with so much money committed. I'm scared that committing 50 million to the forwards will hinder our chances of finishing lower in the standings. When you look at all 4 lines top to bottom it's a decent group.
Worst nightmare would be defense or goalies overachieving and somehow we are fighting for playoffs in 8-9-10 spots.The problem is that all the good teams have zero cap space and all the teams with cap space will ask for a sweetener to take on salary so we're kinda stuck with our guys.
And I agree with you, if guys are able to rebound somewhat or just play at a decent level, we're pretty loaded upfront...
I hope HuGo will be smart enough to still sell at the TDL even if we in some miraculous way are in the mix for a PO spot.Worst nightmare would be defense or goalies overachieving and somehow we are fighting for playoffs in 8-9-10 spots.
For sure. I was just thinking during the season it's hard for Hughes to make moves with so much money committed. I'm scared that committing 50 million to the forwards will hinder our chances of finishing lower in the standings. When you look at all 4 lines top to bottom it's a decent group.
I think it’s pretty bad to sell if you’re in playoff spots. It must be demoralizing for the coach and players, discouraging for paying fans, and it would lead to you having a pick around 10-15 as opposed to 15-20… hardly worth the difference.I hope HuGo will be smart enough to still sell at the TDL even if we in some miraculous way are in the mix for a PO spot.
But you will not get all those assets by selling guys like Dadonov, Monahan, Drouin, and company!I think it’s pretty bad to sell if you’re in playoff spots. It must be demoralizing for the coach and players, discouraging for paying fans, and it would lead to you having a pick around 10-15 as opposed to 15-20… hardly worth the difference.
Good point.But you will not get all those assets by selling guys like Dadonov, Monahan, Drouin, and company!
What for? To get probably eliminated in the first round?
This would be the same story as when Bergevin took over in 2012.
That team was supposed to be bad but they overachieved and instead of going forward with a rebuild, they changed course...
Naaah, the right path at that point was to sell at the TDL but because the team overachieved they went for it.Good point.
I think in 2012 Bergevin should've bought not sold, if he planned to sell he should've done it that preceding summer or the succeeding summer (instead he gave Desharnais a new contract, acquired Colby Armstrong and George Parros and Douglas Murray...).
I wouldn’t call trading for Drewiskie as going all inNaaah, the right path at that point was to sell at the TDL but because the team overachieved they went for it.
They didn't sell at the TDL! Geez, how come is these so hard to understand?I wouldn’t call trading for Drewiskie as going all in
Sell who ? Only Ryder was UFA that yearThey didn't sell at the TDL! Geez, how come is these so hard to understand?
A first-rounder is already better than nothing...Sell who ? Only Ryder was UFA that year